https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65734
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35297
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35297action=edit
patch
A fix for after GCC 5 branches.
On Apr 10, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Aldy Hernandez al...@redhat.com wrote:
KFAIL: gdb.cp/oranking.exp: p foo4(a) (PRMS: gdb/12098)
---
KPASS: gdb.cp/oranking.exp: p foo4(a) (PRMS gdb/12098)
20065c20065
KFAIL: gdb.cp/oranking.exp: p foo101(abc) (PRMS: gdb/12098)
---
KPASS: gdb.cp/oranking.exp:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65740
Bug ID: 65740
Summary: spectacularly bad inlinining decisions with -Os
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
Yesterday I did a mistake in a preparation of the patch for PR65710.
Here is the patch correcting the mistake.
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64, ppc64, and aarch64.
Committed as rev. 221983.
I am committing the patch also to gcc-4.9-branch a bit later.
2015-04-10 Vladimir
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, EXT-Barrett, James wrote:
The following links are broken at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.9.2. The
corresponding 4.9.2-related links at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs are also broken:
GCC 4.9.2 GNAT User's Guide (/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gnat_ugn_unw/)
also in PDF
This came up on IRC today. Editing testsuite_files isn't the only way
to run a subset of tests.
Committed to trunk.
commit 97f1afff492953efa83e07fdbf66af2b77a5ee89
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Apr 10 20:58:54 2015 +0100
* doc/xml/manual/test.xml: Improve
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Hale Wang wrote:
According to the run-time ABI for ARM architecture, this function is allowed
to corrupt only the integer core registers permitted to be corrupted by the
[AAPCS] (r0-r3, ip, lr, and CPSR). So we can't just simply use the existing
GNU conversion functions
Thanks for doing this, Hans-Peter!
I committed a small follow-up on the editorial side, that removes
an empty paragraph, spells C and C++ in uppercase letters, and
simplifies a sentence.
Gerald
Index: simtest-howto.html
===
RCS
I'm sure this still isn't complete, but at least it now contains
information for releases since 4.5, and documents any deprecations.
Committed to trunk.
commit ad10c021b751c515a2e20c74661594a5e99dcede
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 27 12:31:06 2014 +
*
On 10/04/15 22:08 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Tested on ia64-suse-linux, installed as obvious.
Thanks, for this and the m68k one.
...as I had discussed with Joe back in fall 2013. Ahem.
Committed.
Gerald
2015-04-10 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* doc/contrib.texi (Contributors): Update Joe Buck's entry.
Index: doc/contrib.texi
===
---
On 04/03/2015 07:41 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/18/2015 11:51 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 03/17/2015 07:12 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Why are we outlining a DECL_EXTERNAL function?
SRA has no restrictions on whether a function is DECL_EXTERNAL.
Aha.
So it seems that DECL_EXTERNAL is the
Hi,
this patch adds the second testcase that was committed in 4.9 for
PR65647 on trunk.
Committed as rev 221981 and ChangeLog typos are fixed in 221982 and 221993 :/
2015-04-10 Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org
PR target/65647
* gcc.target/arm/pr65647-2.c: New.
diff --git
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/fr.po
(This file,
cpplib-5.1-b20150208.fr.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
coordina...@translationproject.org
Hi Terry,
I went ahead and committed some small changes to the description of
-masm-syntax-unified. Let me know if you disagree or would like to
see further changes.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file:
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
htdocs/svn.html has four occurrences, and a few other pages also
have some. Though I don't think it's appropriate to adjust the
like of news.html, should I update svn.html?
Sure, go ahead.
Done thusly.
Can you please look into mirrors.html which
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/fr.po
(This file,
cpplib-5.1-b20150208.fr.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
coordina...@translationproject.org
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013, Caroline Tice wrote:
I believe I have addressed all the issues with the Vtable Verification
feature. I have updated the announcement patch, and have attached the
updated patch. Is this OK to commit?
Eeh, I just noticed nobody ever applied the patch below. :-(
Sorry about
I would appreciate it if you would do it.
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote:
On Sun, 8 Sep 2013, Caroline Tice wrote:
I believe I have addressed all the issues with the Vtable Verification
feature. I have updated the
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html
But there is a problem with the link to built-ins in onlinedocs.
The HTML reads
liSupport for AVR-specific a
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
This test was failing at -O due to non-trivial conversion at assignment.
The reason is that gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op created invalid GIMPLE,
because fold_ctor_reference called via fold_const_aggregate_ref was
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:06 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
This test was failing at -O due to non-trivial conversion at assignment.
The reason is that gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op created invalid GIMPLE,
because
...per a discussion we had last year when he stepped down.
Applied (Committed revision 222000, a nice number ;-).
Gerald
2015-04-11 Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com
* doc/contrib.texi (Contributors): Add Laurynas Biveinis.
Index: doc/contrib.texi
The Go spec says that carriage returns in raw string literals should
be discarded. The Go frontend was not doing that. This is
http://golang.org/issue/10407. This patch from Minux fixes it.
Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 05:15:33PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 5:06 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
This test was failing at -O due to non-trivial conversion at assignment.
The reason is that
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
Then configuration w/o multiplication should call helper at -O0 and
use shift at higher optimization levels?
That is what I would expect.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015, EXT-Barrett, James wrote:
The following links are broken at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.9.2. The
corresponding 4.9.2-related links at gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs are also broken:
GCC 4.9.2 GNAT User's Guide (/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.2/gnat_ugn_unw/)
also in PDF
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015, Martin Lucina wrote:
On Thursday, 09.04.2015 at 16:20, Joseph Myers wrote:
Why do you not recommend using the vendor component for anything
significant? To me it seems the logical place to say this is a rumprun
toolchain, plus the result is easier to parse than
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:51 PM, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
augustine.sterl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
Then configuration w/o multiplication should call helper at -O0 and
use shift at higher optimization levels?
That is what
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Ilya Palachev i.palac...@samsung.com wrote:
In the mentioned README file it is said that In order to collect this
profile, you will need to have an Intel CPU that have last branch record
(LBR) support. Is this information obsolete? Chrome Canary builds use
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Michael Witten wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC
I'm not looking for anything.
That wiki information should be incorporated into what that wiki page
calls `the official installation docs', and the rest of it should
probably be thrown out as superfluous.
I
LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
profiling.
David
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
profiling.
David
On Apr 10, 2015 10:39 AM, Jan Hubicka
LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
profiling.
I see, that makes sense ;) I guess if we want to support profile collection
on targets w/o this feature we could still use one of the algorithms that
try to guess edge profile from BB profile.
Honza
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Ilya Palachev i.palac...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi,
Here are some questions about AutoFDO.
On 08.05.2014 02:55, Dehao Chen wrote:
We have open-sourced AutoFDO profile toolchain in:
https://github.com/google/autofdo
For GCC developers, the most important tool
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
LBR is used for both cfg edge profiling and indirect call Target value
profiling.
I see, that makes sense ;) I guess if we want to support profile collection
on targets w/o this feature we could still use one of the algorithms
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, then I see why this doesn't happen: mulsi3 pattern matching is
conditional on TARGET_MUL32, so when TARGET_MUL32 ==0 and
expand_simple_binop emits a call to a helper it's not considered
mulsi3, it's just a call:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:18:39AM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:59:19PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote:
Like this:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01086.html
ODR rears its head again ...
huh, why is c/c-lang.h getting included in
Hello GCC team,
Greetings...
I am new user of Linux. I have RHEL 6.0 installed and want to run C++
on my system but I do not know how.
Please help me or let me know where to contact.
--
Thanks Regards,
Kumar Aditya
+919015142426
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65710
--- Comment #26 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Apr 10 19:43:28 2015
New Revision: 221984
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221984root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-10 Vladimir Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65710
--- Comment #27 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Stupachenko Evgeny from comment #16)
I can't attach spec2000 benchmarks sources.
The loop is in longest_match function in 164.gzip.
Options to reproduce:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65701
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It would be nice to test it on AVX enabled intel CPU. There are IMO at least
two things - first is the vectorizer oddity, second is that the fastest code
seems to happen with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65733
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Current gcc-4_9-branch at r221965 suffers the same bootstrap comparison failure
on x86_64-apple-darwin14 with Xcode 6.3's Apple Clang 6.1 compilers and on
x86_64-apple-darwin13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65710
--- Comment #28 from Yvan Roux yroux at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #25)
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Apr 10 19:38:55 2015
New Revision: 221983
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221983root=gccview=rev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65710
--- Comment #29 from Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com ---
Evgeny, could you check the effect of my latest patch (c25) on gzip.
The performance is back. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65735
Bug ID: 65735
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in duplicate_thread_path, at
tree-ssa-threadupdate.c) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65736
Bug ID: 65736
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (in process_init_constructor_array,
at cp/typeck2.c:1263) on arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65736
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65737
Bug ID: 65737
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (Aborted in crash_signal) on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65738
Bug ID: 65738
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE (Aborted in crash_signal) on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65738
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65737
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 65738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65736
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
typedef char uint8;
int gprBank[1];
uint8 *gprMapB[] { (uint8 *)gprBank[0] + 1 }
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65739
Bug ID: 65739
Summary: ICE (gimple_failed) initializing a vector of function
pointers at -O1 or higher
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65739
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65739
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Actually this seems to have been fixed in the last 48 hours or so, I can no
longer reproduce it with the latest trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65739
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65736
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65735
Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65735
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65739
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65554
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||public at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65736
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Just -std=c++11 is needed:
int a[1];
char *b[1] { (char *)a[0] + 1 };
Started to ICE with r221777.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65736
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65737
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65733
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
As Iain pointed out to me, the gcc configure output under the more recent clang
compilers isn't setting BUILD_CONFIG. Oddly gcc trunk also doesn't set
BUILD_CONFIG in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59997
drikosev at otenet dot gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drikosev at otenet dot gr
-c -g conftest.c
mv conftest.o conftest.o.g
../gcc-4.9.3-20150410/contrib/compare-debug conftest.o.g0 conftest.o.g
..which unexpectedly produces...
conftest.o.g0.stripped conftest.o.g.stripped differ: char 433, line 1
stripping off .eh_frame and LTO sections, then retrying
failed to strip off
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65733
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35295
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35295action=edit
binary conftest.o.g from clang 3.6.0 compiler
The binary conftest.o.g was created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65733
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35296
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35296action=edit
binary conftest.o.g0 from clang 3.6.0 compiler
The binary conftest.o.g was created
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65733
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Using...
ld -S -r -no_uuid conftest.o.g -o conftest.o.g.stripped
ld -S -r -no_uuid conftest.o.g0 -o conftest.o.g0.stripped
dwarfdump --eh-frame conftest.o.g.stripped
72 matches
Mail list logo
