On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:27:40AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > I might be wrong but I think you have a bloated code because you use
> > scratches. I already told several times that usage of scratch is always a
> > bad idea. It was
On 04/20/2015 01:09 AM, Shiva Chen wrote:
Hi, Jeff
Thanks for your advice.
can_replace_by.patch is the new patch to handle both cases.
pr43920-2.c.244r.jump2.ori is the original jump2 rtl dump
pr43920-2.c.244r.jump2.patch_can_replace_by is the jump2 rtl dump
after patch can_replace_by.patch
On 20/04/15 06:27 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I might be wrong but I think you have a bloated code because you use
scratches. I already told several times that usage of scratch is always a
bad idea. It was a bad idea for an old RA and
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Peter Colberg wrote:
> gcc‑lua extends the GNU Compiler Collection with the ability to run Lua
> scripts. The plugin provides an interface to register callback functions
> for plugin events, and inspect the abstract syntax tree of a translation
> unit. The plugin
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> I might be wrong but I think you have a bloated code because you use
> scratches. I already told several times that usage of scratch is always a
> bad idea. It was a bad idea for an old RA and is still a bad idea for IRA.
> The usage of
On 17/04/15 05:58 AM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
I allowed me to CC Vladimir; maybe he can propose how the backend can
describe an efficient, constraint-based solution. The problem is
about expanders producing insns with non-fixed hard-regs as in/out
operands or clobbers. This includes move in
On 17/04/15 09:26 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote:
Wilco Dijkstra writes:
While investigating why the IRA preferencing algorithm often chooses
incorrect preferences from the costs, I noticed this thread:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00186.html
I am seeing the exact same issue on AArch64 -
I'm pleased to announce that Segher Boessenkool has been appointed as
maintainer for instruction combiner (combine.c).
Segher, can you please add yourself to the MAINTAINERS file for the
additional role.
Thanks,
jeff
On 04/20/2015 05:08 AM, BELBACHIR Selim wrote:
I've attached the fixed version of the patch. I've tested it on the trunk with
my private target.
I can't provide a test because apparently no backend (other than my private
one) uses delay slots with more that 1 slot.
I was also unable to test th
On 04/20/2015 09:18 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
because I really dislike the hassle our (almost) flattened header
files cause quite often, I have made a very simple experiment to find
out how the header files really depend on each other.
Interestingly even when the preferences are accurate, lra_constraints
completely ignores the preferred/allocno class. If the cost of 2 alternatives
is equal in every way (which will be the case if they are both legal matches
as the standard cost functions are not used at all), the wrong one may be
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:14:48AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On 4/20/2015 5:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 19 April 2015 at 03:06, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> >> Is it one of the standard g++ or libstdc++ test cases that is failing? I
> >> could check what nios2-elf does with it if I
On 4/20/2015 5:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 19 April 2015 at 03:06, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> Is it one of the standard g++ or libstdc++ test cases that is failing? I
>> could check what nios2-elf does with it if I knew what to look for.
> Libstdc++ does not use the __sync built-ins in the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> because I really dislike the hassle our (almost) flattened header
> files cause quite often, I have made a very simple experiment to find
> out how the header files really depend on each other. Some results,
> together with a dozen o
Hi,
because I really dislike the hassle our (almost) flattened header
files cause quite often, I have made a very simple experiment to find
out how the header files really depend on each other. Some results,
together with a dozen of short paragraphs of relevant text are here:
http://labs.suse.cz
How to add an anchor to one of the onlinedocs texi documents?
Suppose I'd like to add an HTML anchor to one of the onlinedocs, for example to
link it from the gcc release notes.
Currently the only anchors are either auto-generated and contain some hashes
(hence not usable from external docume
I've attached the fixed version of the patch. I've tested it on the trunk with
my private target.
I can't provide a test because apparently no backend (other than my private
one) uses delay slots with more that 1 slot.
I was also unable to test the behaviour of this patch for an hypothetic targe
On 19 April 2015 at 03:06, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Is it one of the standard g++ or libstdc++ test cases that is failing? I
> could check what nios2-elf does with it if I knew what to look for.
Libstdc++ does not use the __sync built-ins in the 4.9 branch, it has
switched to the __atomic ones wh
Hi, Jeff
Thanks for your advice.
can_replace_by.patch is the new patch to handle both cases.
pr43920-2.c.244r.jump2.ori is the original jump2 rtl dump
pr43920-2.c.244r.jump2.patch_can_replace_by is the jump2 rtl dump
after patch can_replace_by.patch
Could you help me to review the patch?
Th
19 matches
Mail list logo
