On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 08:26:45AM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> (gfc_oacc_routine_name): New struct;
Full stop instead of semicolon.
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-nested.c b/gcc/tree-nested.c
> index 1f6311c..e321072 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-nested.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-nested.c
> @@ -1106,6
On 20/11/15 01:23, David Wohlferd wrote:
> I tried to picture the most basic case I can think of that uses
> something clobber-able:
>
> for (int x=0; x < 1000; x++)
>asm("#stuff");
>
> This generates very simple and highly performant code:
>
> movl$1000, %eax
> .L2:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68373
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Nov 20 10:25:26 2015
New Revision: 230650
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230650=gcc=rev
Log:
Do final value replacement in try_create_reduction_list
2015-11-20 Tom
On 11/20/2015 11:33 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi Pedro.
Hi Martin.
> Fully agree with you, there's suggested patch.
> Hope I can install the patch for trunk?
I'd call it obvious. :-)
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hi Kirill,
On 18/11/15 14:11, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
Hello Andreas, Devid.
On 18 Nov 10:45, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Kirill Yukhin writes:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attr-simd.c
b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attr-simd.c
new file mode 100644
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36781
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36781=edit
gcc6-pr68339.patch
Untested fix.
This patch to the Go frontend fixes the case where two different
methods on different types with the same method name both define a
type internally with the same name where the type requires a specific
type hash or equality function. Before this patch those functions
would get the same, causing a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
--- Comment #3 from Yulia Koval ---
I agree, that %u usage is not a bug, but it still looks strange..
For gcc --target=i586-elf macro has:
#define __UINT32_TYPE__ long unsigned int
For non-target gcc or gcc --target=i586-unknown-linux it has:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
Bug 52846 depends on bug 66762, which changed state.
Bug 66762 Summary: ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_[16].f90 with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 20/11/15 11:37, Richard Biener wrote:
I'd rather make loop_optimizer_init do nothing
if requested flags are already set and no fixup is needed
Thus sth like
Index: gcc/loop-init.c
===
--- gcc/loop-init.c (revision
Hello Kyrill,
On 20 Nov 12:15, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> >gcc/tessuite/
> > * c-c++-common/attr-simd-3.c: Put xfail (PR68158) on dg-error.
>
> This test fails on bare-metal targets that don't support -fcilkplus or
> -pthread.
> Would you consider moving them to the cilkplus testing directory
On 11/19/2015 12:49 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/18/2015 12:16 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
I don't think so, actually. One safe option would be to rip it out and
just stop transforming this case, but let's start by looking at the code
just a bit further down, calling noce_can_store_speculate. This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:50:35 2015
New Revision: 230661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230661=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68237
*
On 11/11/15 16:10, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The attached testcase ICEs when compiled with -march=armv6k -mthumb -Os or
> any march
> for which -mthumb gives Thumb1:
> error: unrecognizable insn:
> }
> ^
> (insn 13 12 14 5 (set (reg:SI 116 [ x ])
> (unspec:SI [
>
On 20 November 2015 at 13:12, wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I wanted to reach out and let you know about this link which isn’t working -
> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/, I
> found it on this page -
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
rgaveiga at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rgaveiga at gmail dot com
This patch was pushed on binutils-gdb repo, so I also commit it on gcc.
Tristan.
2015-11-20 Tristan Gingold
Sync with binutils-gdb:
2015-11-20 Tristan Gingold
* configure.ac: Add aarch64-*-darwin* and arm-*-darwin*.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68149
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Nov 20 15:15:31 2015
New Revision: 230663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230663=gcc=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 68149 Fix ICE in unaligned_loaddi split
PR
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Alan Hayward wrote:
>
>
> On 20/11/2015 11:00, "Richard Biener" wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Alan Hayward
>>wrote:
>>> When vectorising a integer induction condition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
Bug ID: 68459
Summary: ICE when compiling for alpha with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhowells at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 20/11/2015 13:47, "Richard Biener" wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Alan Hayward
>wrote:
>>
>>
>>On 20/11/2015 11:00, "Richard Biener" wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Alan Hayward
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
--- Comment #9 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alahay01
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:20:24 2015
New Revision: 230658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230658=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Alan Hayward
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:50:35 2015
New Revision: 230661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230661=gcc=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68237
*
Dear All,
I have committed as 'obvious' revision 230661 to fix 2/3 submodule
problems. In the case of the third, PR68243, I believe gfortran is
behaving correctly and I am awaiting confirmation from the reporter.
Thanks to Dominique for regtesting the part of the patch that fixes PR66762.
I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Dmitry Polukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitry.polukhin at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 36783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36783=edit
Suggested patch1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 36784
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36784=edit
Suggested patch2
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 20/11/15 11:37, Richard Biener wrote:
> >I'd rather make loop_optimizer_init do nothing
> > if requested flags are already set and no fixup is needed
>
> > Thus sth like
> >
> > Index: gcc/loop-init.c
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
Bug ID: 68458
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
The backtrace was obtained from a compiler built from unpatched gcc sources
produced from a gcc SVN branch with the following parameters:
SVNREV 225895
DATE 20150716
gcc_version 5.2.1
The
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> On 19 Nov 18:19, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On November 19, 2015 6:12:30 PM GMT+01:00, Bernd Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> >On 11/19/2015 05:31 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> >> Currently we fold all
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:45:05AM -0800, David Wohlferd wrote:
> On 11/19/2015 7:14 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:23:55PM -0800, David Wohlferd wrote:
> >>For that reason, I'd like to propose adding 2 new clobbers to extended
> >>asm as part of this work:
> >>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 10/11/15 17:32, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This ICE in this PR occurs when we're trying to split unaligned_loaddi into
> two SImode unaligned loads.
> The problem is in the addressing mode. When reload was picking the
> addressing mode we accepted an offset of
> -256 because the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can't reproduce, at least not on i7-5960X (thus OMP_NUM_THREADS=16).
gcc -Ofast -fopenmp built cutcp is roughly the same performance in all of 4.6,
4.8, 5.1 and 6, the only thing that reliably helps (but
On 20 Nov 14:54, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> > On 19 Nov 18:19, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On November 19, 2015 6:12:30 PM GMT+01:00, Bernd Schmidt
> >> wrote:
> >> >On 11/19/2015 05:31 PM, Ilya
Jim discovered that he needed to override the anchoring hook when using a PPC
host-side compiler, but didn't figure out why this was needed. Digging into it,
I discovered that flag_section_anchors is cleared in toplev.c by the command
line option machinery, if there are no anchor target hooks.
On 20/11/15 12:27, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:32:36AM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
On 11/12/2015 09:39 AM, Evandro Menezes wrote:
2015-11-12 Evandro Menezes
[AArch64] Add attribute for compatibility with ARM pipeline models
gcc/
On 11/20/2015 01:23 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 11/20/2015 12:52 PM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
>> +(define_insn "bswaphi2"
>> + [(set (match_operand:HI 0 "register_operand" "=d")
>> +(bswap:HI (match_operand:HI 1 "memory_operand" "RT")))]
>> + "TARGET_CPU_ZARCH"
>> +
On 20 Nov 14:31, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2015-11-20 14:28 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ilya Enkovich
> > wrote:
> >> 2015-11-18 16:44 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> >>> On Wed, Nov 18,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> A cygwin hosted cross compiler to aarch64-linux, compiling a C version
> of linpack with -Ofast, produces code that runs 17% slower than a
> linux hosted compiler. The problem shows up in the vect dump, where
> some
> Eric has just submitted a documentation path that documented the
> {add,sub,mul,umul}v4 and negv3 patterns, so this should be
> applied on top of that.
OK, I'm going to apply it, thanks. Note that the comment at the beginning
of expand_addsub_overflow describing the overall strategy ought to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65701
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On 11/20/2015 3:14 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 20/11/15 10:37, David Wohlferd wrote:
The intent for 24414 is to change basic asm such that it will become
(quoting jeff) "an opaque blob that read/write/clobber any register or
memory location." Such being the case, "memory" is not sufficient:
[ was: Re: [PATCH, 10/16] Add pass_oacc_kernels pass group in passes.def ]
On 18/11/15 17:22, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Bonus points for fixing the dump_file to parse in:
>Parloops will fail because:
>...
>phi is n_2 = PHI
>arg of phi to exit: value n_4(D) used outside loop
Status
==
We plan to do a GCC 5.3 release candidate at the end of next week
followed by the actual release a week after that.
So now is the time to look at your regression bugs in bugzilla and
do some backporting for things already fixed on trunk.
Quality Data
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
Toward fixing PR68385. I'm just starting a full round of testing, but
extern void underflow(void) __attribute__((noreturn));
unsigned sub1(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
unsigned r = a - b;
if (r > a) underflow();
return r;
}
unsigned sub2(unsigned a, unsigned b)
{
unsigned r;
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 17/11/15 15:53, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > > And the above LIM example
> > > is none for why you need two LIM passes...
> >
> > Indeed. I'm planning a separate reply to explain in more detail the need
> > for the two pass_lims.
>
> I.
>
> I managed to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68373
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:27:48AM +0100, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Toward fixing PR68385. I'm just starting a full round of testing, but
>
> extern void underflow(void) __attribute__((noreturn));
> unsigned sub1(unsigned a, unsigned b)
> {
> unsigned r = a - b;
> if (r > a)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #8
2015-11-20 14:28 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> 2015-11-18 16:44 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Ilya Enkovich
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 6:04 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Jeff pre-approved the plugin version of this (as a new
> file unittests/test-bitmap.c):
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg03284.html
> with:
>> OK if/when prereqs are approved. Minor twiddling if we end
On 20/11/15 10:37, David Wohlferd wrote:
> The intent for 24414 is to change basic asm such that it will become
> (quoting jeff) "an opaque blob that read/write/clobber any register or
> memory location." Such being the case, "memory" is not sufficient:
>
> #define CLOBBERALL "eax", "ebx",
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0600, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 02:51 PM, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> >2015-11-05 Evandro Menezes
> >
> > gcc/
> >
> > * config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_override_options_internal):
> > Increase loop peeling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Adrian Wielgosik from comment #2)
> Your operator< doesn't seem to satisfy strict weak ordering. Once I rewrote
> it to a basic but safer version:
>
> bool operator< (const chave& lhs, const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65660
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Martin or Honza, can you work on a backport please?
Hey,
I wanted to reach out and let you know about this link which isn’t
working -
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/ObjectiveC/, I
found it on this page -
http://gd.tuwien.ac.at/.vhost/www.gnu.org/software/gcc/readings.html.
You’re link includes this text -
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> We plan to do a GCC 5.3 release candidate at the end of next week
> followed by the actual release a week after that.
>
> So now is the time to look at your regression bugs in bugzilla and
> do some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Since the provided testcase is affected by the path splitting patch, here's an
alternative testcase that exhibits the ifcvt issue even with the latest trunk.
I'll be working on this:
typedef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68445
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Target
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 17/11/15 23:20, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > [ was: Re: [PATCH, 10/16] Add pass_oacc_kernels pass group in passes.def ]
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Consider test-case test.c, with a use of the final value of the
> > iteration variable (return i):
> > ...
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68455
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:12:06AM +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this documents the new overflow arithmetics patterns added recently (addv4,
> subv4, mulv4, umulv4, negv3) and only them, i.e. the old ones are still not.
> This also fixes the description of the cbranch and jump patterns,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Bug ID: 68456
Summary: UINT32_TYPE is long unsigned for 32bit targets
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
On 11/19/2015 7:14 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 05:23:55PM -0800, David Wohlferd wrote:
For that reason, I'd like to propose adding 2 new clobbers to extended
asm as part of this work:
"clobberall" - This gives extended the same semantics as whatever the
new basic asm
> Toward fixing PR68385. I'm just starting a full round of testing, but
Do you mind if I install my doc patch? It's slightly more thorough.
--
Eric Botcazou
Hi Andrew,
On 17/11/15 22:10, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Because the imp and parts are really integer rather than strings, this patch
moves the comparisons to be integer. Also allows saving around integers are
easier than doing string comparisons. This allows for the next change.
The way I store
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> 2015-11-18 16:44 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener :
>> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Ilya Enkovich
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When we compute vectypes we skip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Yulia Koval from comment #0)
> This problem causes strange warnings, for example in printf("%u...", if this
> type is not overriden somewhere in the library:
> ": format '%u' expects argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
This issue is host-dependent, it doesn't reproduce with a cross to 64-bit
SPARC.
The problematic types are:
(gdb) p debug_tree(t1)
>
(gdb) p debug_tree(t2)
>
and they compare equal according to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
On 11/20/2015 01:38 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 11/20/2015 3:14 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 20/11/15 10:37, David Wohlferd wrote:
The intent for 24414 is to change basic asm such that it will become
(quoting jeff) "an opaque blob that read/write/clobber any register or
memory location." Such
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
---
Hi,
this documents the new overflow arithmetics patterns added recently (addv4,
subv4, mulv4, umulv4, negv3) and only them, i.e. the old ones are still not.
This also fixes the description of the cbranch and jump patterns, which were
referring to a label_ref instead of a code_label.
Tested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Hi David.
I've just verified that the invalid free is presented since introduction of
driver::finalize in r227188.
This is valgrind report coming from r230263 (one revision before the
suspected):
$
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:22:16AM -0600, James Norris wrote:
> 2015-XX-XX James Norris
> Cesar Philippidis
>
> gcc/fortran/
> * dump-parse-tree.c (show_namespace): Handle declares.
> * gfortran.h (struct
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Alan Hayward wrote:
> When vectorising a integer induction condition reduction,
> is_nonwrapping_integer_induction ends up with different values for base
> during the analysis and build phases. In the first it is an INTEGER_CST,
> in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68457
Bug ID: 68457
Summary: make check RUNTESTFLAGS="--outdir=$OUT_PATH" does not
work with -j
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On 19 Nov 18:19, Richard Biener wrote:
> On November 19, 2015 6:12:30 PM GMT+01:00, Bernd Schmidt
> wrote:
> >On 11/19/2015 05:31 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >> Currently we fold all memcpy/memmove calls with a known data size.
> >> It causes two problems when used with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jiong Wang from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Jiong Wang from comment #6)
> > > Created attachment 36741 [details]
> > > prototype-fix
> > >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68436
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 16/11/15 13:45, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > I've eliminated all the uses for pass_tree_loop_init/pass_tree_loop_done
> > > in
> > > >the pass group. Instead, I've added conditional loop optimizer setup in:
> > > >- pass_lim and pass_scev_cprop (added
On 11/20/2015 2:17 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 20/11/15 01:23, David Wohlferd wrote:
I tried to picture the most basic case I can think of that uses
something clobber-able:
for (int x=0; x < 1000; x++)
asm("#stuff");
This generates very simple and highly performant code:
On 11/20/2015 11:56 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Eric has just submitted a documentation path that documented the
{add,sub,mul,umul}v4 and negv3 patterns, so this should be
applied on top of that.
OK, I'm going to apply it, thanks.
Thanks.
Note that the comment at the beginning
of
On 11/20/2015 11:43 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
+(define_expand "uaddv4"
+ [(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
+ (compare:CCC
+(plus:SWI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2))
+(match_dup 1)))
+ (set (match_dup 0)
+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
Adrian Wielgosik changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adrian.wielgosik at gmail dot
com
Hi Andre,
On 18/11/15 09:44, Andre Vieira wrote:
On 17/11/15 10:10, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 01:15:32PM +, Andre Vieira wrote:
On 16/11/15 12:07, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:49:11AM +, Andre Vieira wrote:
Hi,
This patch changes the
1 - 100 of 295 matches
Mail list logo