[Bug c++/68689] flexible array members in unions accepted in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68689 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68689] New: flexible array members in unions accepted in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68689 Bug ID: 68689 Summary: flexible array members in unions accepted in C++ Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/68690] New: PowerPC64: TOC save in PHP core loop results in load hit store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68690 Bug ID: 68690 Summary: PowerPC64: TOC save in PHP core loop results in load hit store Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/68692] New: [graphite] ice: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 Bug ID: 68692 Summary: [graphite] ice: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/68529] scev failed for while(i--)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68529 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

Re: [PATCH] Improve constant vec_perm expansion on i?86 (PR target/68655)

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > As discussed in the PR, for some permutation we can get better code > if we try to expand it as if it was a permutation in a mode with the > same vector size, but wider vector element. The first attempt to do this >

[Bug rtl-optimization/68691] New: ICE at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu in alter_subregs, at lra-spills.c:610 (in 32-bit mode)

with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151203 (experimental) [trunk revision 231219] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -m32 -O2 -g -c small.c $ gcc-trunk -m64 -O3 -g -c small.c $ gcc-5.2 -m32 -O3

Re: [PATCH AArch64]Handle REG+REG+CONST and REG+NON_REG+CONST in legitimize address

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 03/12/15 05:26, Bin.Cheng wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Richard Earnshaw >> wrote: >>> On 01/12/15 03:19, Bin.Cheng wrote: On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM,

[Bug c++/68478] flexible array members have complete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68478 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68613] initializer-string for array of chars is too long error on flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68613 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00511.html

[Bug lto/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/68688] segmentation fault on regex matching long strings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68688 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/53548] allow flexible array members in unions like zero-length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548 --- Comment #4 from Mike Frysinger --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) that's fine. thanks !

[Bug tree-optimization/68550] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Error: missing PHI def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[PATCH AArch64]Use aarch64_sync_memory_operand in atomic_store pattern

Hi, I noticed atmoic_store pattern is the only one in atomic.md that uses memory_operand as predicate. This seems like a typo to me. It also causes problem. The general address expression supported by memory_operand is kept till LRA finds out it doesn't match the "Q" constraint. As a result

[Bug c/53548] allow flexible array members in unions like zero-length arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

Ping [PATCH] c++/42121 - diagnose invalid flexible array members

[CC Jason for the C++ changes and Joseph for the one C change.] Attached is a reworked and expanded patch for the bug plus three others in the same area that I uncovered while developing and testing the former patch: c++/68689 - flexible array members in unions accepted in C++ c++/68478 -

[Bug tree-optimization/68693] New: [6 Regression] ice: in harmful_stmt_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1052

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68693 Bug ID: 68693 Summary: [6 Regression] ice: in harmful_stmt_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1052 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/68693] [6 Regression] ice: in harmful_stmt_in_region, at graphite-scop-detection.c:1052

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68693 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2015-12-4 CC|

-fstrict-aliasing fixes 6/6: permit inlining of comdats

Hi, this is the last patch of the series. It makes operand_equal_p to compare alias sets even in !flag_strict_aliasing before inlining so inlining !flag_strict_aliasing to flag_strict_aliasing is possible when callee is merged comdat. I tried to explain it in greater detail in the comment in

[Bug c++/68689] flexible array members in unions accepted in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68689 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg00511.html

[Bug tree-optimization/68692] [6 Regression] ice: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2015-12-4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/63586] x+x+x+x -> 4*x in gimple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to kugan from comment #2) > ;; Function f4 (f4, funcdef_no=3, decl_uid=4162, cgraph_uid=3, > symbol_order=3) > > ;; 1 loops found > ;; > ;; Loop 0 > ;; header 0, latch 1 > ;; depth 0, outer -1 >

[Bug libstdc++/61582] C++11 regex memory corruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61582 Tim Shen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kerukuro at gmail dot com --- Comment #17

[Bug tree-optimization/68550] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed Error: missing PHI def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68550 --- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #5) > fixed BTW, with this fixed, I can compile our CP2K code with -floop-nest-optimize at various -Ox and all seems correct. Thanks! I'll try to integrate

[Bug middle-end/68291] [6 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68291 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva --- Eric, apologies for the slow response, I'm in the middle of an all-week trip with little Internet access. I think the best course of action is to adjust gimple_can_coalesce_p so that it returns false for

[Bug c/57180] Structures with a flexible arrray member have wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57180 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #4 from Georg Koppen --- It is using -lasan it seems: Executing: c++ -o firefox -Wall -Wempty-body -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsign-compare -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wcast-align -v -fsanitize=address -Dxmalloc=myxmalloc

[Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- No, this isn't something we'd want to backport I think, For GCC 5, we'll need another (but trivial) fix.

Re: [PATCH, C++] Wrap OpenACC wait in EXPR_STMT

On 2015/12/3 6:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:05:36PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: >>> Oh wait, it looks like the C++ front end is not actually using the >>> functions defined in the C/C++-shared gcc/c-family/c-omp.c, but has its >>> own implementations in

Re: Add an rsqrt_optab and IFN_RSQRT internal function

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:21:03AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> * internal-fn.def (RSQRT): New function. >> * optabs.def (rsqrt_optab): New optab. >> * doc/tm.texi (rsqrtM2): Document > > Missing

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/68672] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68676] New: ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_10.f08

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68676 Bug ID: 68676 Summary: ICE in gfc_match_formal_arglist when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_10.f08 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug lto/68556] [6 Regression] -r -flto test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68556 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/68545] gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp hides compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68545 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Re: [PATCH] Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 12:09:04PM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote: > The flag is set here in expand_omp_target: > ... > 12682 /* Prevent IPA from removing child_fn as unreachable, > since there are no > 12683refs from the parent function to child_fn in offload >

[Bug tree-optimization/68671] New: [5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68671 Bug ID: 68671 Summary: [5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dce Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Re: [PATCH] Fix shrink-wrap bug with anticipating into loops (PR67778, PR68634)

On 12/02/2015 07:21 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: After shrink-wrapping has found the "tightest fit" for where to place the prologue, it tries move it earlier (so that frame saves are run earlier) -- but without copying any more basic blocks. Unfortunately a candidate block we select can be

[Bug tree-optimization/68673] New: Handle __builtin_GOMP_task optimally in ipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68673 Bug ID: 68673 Summary: Handle __builtin_GOMP_task optimally in ipa-pta Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/68674] ARM attribute target neon warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||65837

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 > > --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Created attachment 36897 > -->

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess it needs analysis. Some examples of changes: vshuf-v16qi.c -msse2 test_2, scalar code vs. punpcklqdq, clear win vshuf-v16qi.c -msse4 test_2, pshufb -> punpcklqdq (is this a win or not?) (similarly

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

Re: [PATCH] Empty redirect_edge_var_map after each pass and function

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Alan Lawrence wrote: > On 02/12/15 14:13, Jeff Law wrote: > > On 12/02/2015 01:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > Right. So the question I have is how/why did DOM leave anything in the > > > > map. > > > > And if DOM is fixed to not leave stuff lying around, can we then

Re: [UPC 02/22] tree-related changes

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Gary Funck wrote: > On 12/01/15 12:26:32, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote: > > > -struct GTY(()) tree_type_common { > > > +struct GTY((user)) tree_type_common { > > >struct tree_common common; > > >tree size; > > >tree size_unit; > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 Bug ID: 68670 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug middle-end/68672] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Bug ID: 68672 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug target/68674] New: ARM attribute target neon warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68674 Bug ID: 68674 Summary: ARM attribute target neon warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

Re: [PATCH, PR46032] Handle BUILT_IN_GOMP_PARALLEL in ipa-pta

On 30/11/15 14:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 02:24:18PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: OK for stage3 trunk if bootstrap and reg-test succeeds? -|| node->address_taken); +|| (node->address_taken +&&

Re: [PATCH] Fix shrink-wrap bug with anticipating into loops (PR67778, PR68634)

On 12/02/2015 07:21 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: After shrink-wrapping has found the "tightest fit" for where to place the prologue, it tries move it earlier (so that frame saves are run earlier) -- but without copying any more basic blocks. Another question would be - is there really a good

Re: Add fuzzing coverage support

On 12/02/2015 06:38 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: One thing to consider would be whether you really need this split between O0/optimize versions, or whether you can find a place in the queue where to insert it unconditionally. Have you considered this at all or did you just follow asan/tsan? I

Re: [ARM] Fix PR middle-end/65958

> I can understand this restriction, but... > > > + /* See the same assertion on PROBE_INTERVAL above. */ > > + gcc_assert ((first % 4096) == 0); > > ... why isn't this a test that FIRST is aligned to PROBE_INTERVAL? Because that isn't guaranteed, FIRST is related to the size of the

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #6 from Georg Koppen --- Alright, thanks. So, what happens with r215527 is that checking for dlopen() working properly in the configure script is not enough anymore to decide whether one needs -ldl needs to get added explicitly if

Re: [ARM] Fix PR middle-end/65958

Sorry for the delay, very busy on other things these days... On 16/11/15 20:00, Eric Botcazou wrote: >> More comments inline. > > Revised version attached, which addresses all your comments and in particular > removes the > > +#if PROBE_INTERVAL > 4096 > +#error Cannot use indexed addressing mode

Re: [PATCH] Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta

On 03/12/15 09:59, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote: On 03/12/15 01:10, Tom de Vries wrote: I've managed to reproduce it. The difference between pass and fail is whether the compiler is configured with or without accelerator. I'll look into it. In the

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 66051, which changed state. Bug 66051 Summary: can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/66051] can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Dec 3 11:26:56 2015 New Revision: 231225 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231225=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-03 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/66051] can't vectorize reductions inside an SLP group

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66051 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR68534 - No error on mismatch in number of arguments between submodule and module interface

Dear Steve, I'll take a look at this this afternoon. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Cheers Paul On 3 December 2015 at 07:43, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:26:30PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 10:02:33PM

Re: [PATCH, 4/16] Implement -foffload-alias

On 11/11/15 12:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:51:02AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: The option -foffload-alias=pointer instructs the compiler to assume that objects references in an offload region do not alias. The option -foffload-alias=all instructs the compiler to make

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 36897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36897=edit gcc6-pr68655.patch Initial untested patch. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to be always a win, when looking at the

[Bug tree-optimization/68675] New: Handle GOMP_target_ext optimally in ipa-pta

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68675 Bug ID: 68675 Summary: Handle GOMP_target_ext optimally in ipa-pta Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/68669] [5 regression] -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Version|5.1.0

[Bug middle-end/68672] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug tree-optimization/68671] [5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr66952.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68671 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.4

[Bug rtl-optimization/68670] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr68376-2.c FAILs with -ftracer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68670 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 > > --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- > I guess it needs analysis. > Some examples

[Bug c++/68669] -Wunused-variable is not correctly supressed by #pragmas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68669 --- Comment #2 from Pavel Celba --- Created attachment 36893 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36893=edit Preprocessed run_tests.cpp Added the pre-processed run_tests.cpp

Re: [PATCH] Handle BUILT_IN_GOACC_PARALLEL in ipa-pta

On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 03/12/15 09:59, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, Tom de Vries wrote: > > > > > On 03/12/15 01:10, Tom de Vries wrote: > > > > > > > > I've managed to reproduce it. The difference between pass and fail is > > > > whether the compiler is

Re: [PATCH] Empty redirect_edge_var_map after each pass and function

On 02/12/15 14:13, Jeff Law wrote: On 12/02/2015 01:33 AM, Richard Biener wrote: Right. So the question I have is how/why did DOM leave anything in the map. And if DOM is fixed to not leave stuff lying around, can we then assert that nothing is ever left in those maps between passes? There's

Re: building gcc with macro support for gdb?

Ryan Burn writes: > Is there any way to easily build a stage1 gcc with macro support for > debugging? Set STAGE1_CFLAGS. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something

[Bug c/68668] New: [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668 Bug ID: 68668 Summary: [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 67800, which changed state. Bug 67800 Summary: [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86 (DOT_PROD_EXPR in non-reduction) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/67800] [6 Regression] Missed vectorization opportunity on x86 (DOT_PROD_EXPR in non-reduction)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

Re: Add an rsqrt_optab and IFN_RSQRT internal function

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:21:03AM +, Richard Sandiford wrote: > * internal-fn.def (RSQRT): New function. > * optabs.def (rsqrt_optab): New optab. > * doc/tm.texi (rsqrtM2): Document Missing full stop. Otherwise looks to me like a nice cleanup and hopefully fixes the

Re: [PATCH AArch64]Handle REG+REG+CONST and REG+NON_REG+CONST in legitimize address

e form like "r1 + r2 + 0x3ffc". >>>> + Since the offset is within range supported by addressing >>>> + mode "reg+offset", we don't split the const and legalize >>>> + it into below insn and expr sequence: >>>> +

[Bug preprocessor/57580] Repeated _Pragma message directives in macro causes problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 6+.

[Bug sanitizer/68650] Firefox compilation fails with Address Sanitizer (error: undefined reference to 'dlerror')

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68650 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- /home/thomas/Arbeit/Tor/mozilla-central/xpcom/glue/standalone/nsXPCOMGlue.cpp:167: error: undefined reference to 'dlerror' That does look like it is actually one

[Bug tree-optimization/68639] [6 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68639] [6 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68639 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Dec 3 08:38:10 2015 New Revision: 231220 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231220=gcc=rev Log: 2015-12-03 Richard Biener PR

Fix buildbreaker with isl 0.14

[ was: Re: [PATCH] [graphite] handle missing isl_ast_expr ] On 03/12/15 00:56, Tom de Vries wrote: Hi, This break the build for me, with isl 0.14. ... src/gcc/graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c: In member function ‘tree_node* translate_isl_ast_to_gimple::binary_op_to_tree(tree, isl_ast_expr*,

[Bug testsuite/68232] gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c fails on some arm configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68232 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.

[Bug target/68620] ICE on gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-fp16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620 --- Comment #4 from Christophe Lyon --- Maybe, that's what I'm trying to figure out. Given the comment in arm.h before the definition of CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS, maybe we need to define more patterns, for all the sizes where

[Bug ipa/64812] [4.9 regression] x86 LibreOffice Build failure: undefined reference to acquire

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812 > > Jan Hubicka changed: > >What|Removed |Added

Re: [gomp-nvptx 4/9] nvptx backend: add -mgomp option and multilib

On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Can you post sample code with assembly for -msoft-stack and -muniform-simt > showing how are short interesting cases expanded? Here's short examples; please let me know if I'm misunderstanding and you wanted something else. First, -muniform-simt effect

[Ping^2][AArch64][TLSGD][2/2] Implement TLS GD traditional for tiny code model

On 13/11/15 15:21, Jiong Wang wrote: On 05/11/15 14:57, Jiong Wang wrote: Marcus Shawcroft writes: +#ifdef HAVE_AS_TINY_TLSGD_RELOCS + return SYMBOL_TINY_TLSGD; +#else + return SYMBOL_SMALL_TLSGD; +#endif Rather than introduce blocks of conditional compilation it is better to gate

[PATCH, CHKP] Fix bounds returned for structures

Hi, Currently multiple return-struct-* tests from MPX testsuite fail. This patch fixes it. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Applied to trunk. I'm going to port it to GCC5 after 5.3 release. Thanks, Ilya -- gcc/ 2015-12-03 Ilya Enkovich

[Bug c/68513] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:8832, c_maybe_const_expr in IL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68513 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

Add an rsqrt_optab and IFN_RSQRT internal function

All current uses of builtin_reciprocal convert 1.0/sqrt into rsqrt. This patch adds an rsqrt optab and associated internal function for that instead. We can then pick up the vector forms of rsqrt automatically, fixing an AArch64 regression from my internal_fn patches. With that change,

Re: [PATCH] RFC: Use Levenshtein spelling suggestions in Fortran FE

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > As said, we could as well use a list of candidates with NULL as record marker. > Implementation cosmetics. Steve seems to not be thrilled by the > overall idea in the first place, so unless there is clear

[Bug rtl-optimization/68651] [5/6 Regression][AArch64] Missing combination of shift-by-one with other arithmetic patterns with -mcpu=cortex-a53

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68651 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[PATCH] Handle OBJ_TYPE_REF in FRE

The following patch handles CSEing OBJ_TYPE_REF which was omitted because it is a GENERIC expression even on GIMPLE (for whatever reason...). Rather than changing this now the following patch simply treats it properly as such. Bootstrap & regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Note that

Re: [PATCH, C++] Wrap OpenACC wait in EXPR_STMT

Hi Chung-Lin! On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 21:15:00 +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote: > The OpenACC wait directive is represented as a call to the runtime > function "GOACC_wait" instead of a tree code. I am seeing when > '#pragma acc wait' is using inside a template function, the

[Bug c/68668] [6 Regression] bogus error: invalid use of array with unspecified bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68668 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[PATCH][RTL-ifcvt] PR rtl-optimization/68624: Clean up logic that checks for clobbering conflicts across basic blocks

Hi all, In this fix I want to simplify the control flow of the code that chooses the order in which to emit the then and else basic blocks (and their associated emit_a and emit_b instructions). Currently we check the then block and only if there is a modification there we check the else block

[Bug target/68655] SSE2 cannot vec_perm of low and high part

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 3 Dec 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68655 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug target/68620] ICE on gcc.target/arm/attr-neon-fp16.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68620 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

  1   2   3   4   >