Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after

2016-04-01 Thread Martin Liška
On 03/31/2016 05:48 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: > > Yes, but please note, that this page describes differences between two > particular revisions. For current trunk (and release) GCC and LLVM versions > the situation might be different. > >> >> Finally any plans to integrate other sanitizer tool

Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)?

2016-04-01 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 01/04/16 04:39, Martin Sebor wrote: At the same time, having the ability to do what PR 70275 asks for (i.e., suppress only warnings that have not be been explicitly enabled or elevated to errors) can be handy as well. If it's preferable to keep -w unchanged, providing a new option to do it mi

Re: Re: stray quotation marks warning enhancement or extension

2016-04-01 Thread Manuel López-Ibáñez
On 31/03/16 23:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 31 March 2016@21:10, Daniel Gutson wrote: Hi, many times we copy code snippets from sources that change the Unicode quotation marks ( “ ” ) rather than " ". For example const std::string a_string(“Hello”); That line looks innocent but

Re: Should a disabled warning be allowed to be promoted to an error(Bugzilla PR 70275)?

2016-04-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 03/31/2016 09:39 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 03/31/2016 10:30 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 04:32:50PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote: On 03/28/2016 01:56 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: In Bugzilla PR # 70275, Manuel López-Ibáñez reports that even though he provides the "-Werro

Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets

2016-04-01 Thread Bill Seurer
Is there some way using deja-gnu to have a single test case run multiple times using different sets of compiler options? I didn't see anything in the documentation and didn't see any examples when I searched the existing test cases (though of course I wasn't exactly sure what to look for). F

Re: Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets

2016-04-01 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Bill Seurer wrote: > Is there some way using deja-gnu to have a single test case run multiple > times using different sets of compiler options? I didn't see anything in > the documentation and didn't see any examples when I searched the existing > test cases (thoug

Re: Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets

2016-04-01 Thread Bill Seurer
On 04/01/16 10:48, Andrew Pinski wrote: On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Bill Seurer wrote: Is there some way using deja-gnu to have a single test case run multiple times using different sets of compiler options? I didn't see anything in the documentation and didn't see any examples when I sear

Re: Run one gcc test case multiple times with different option sets

2016-04-01 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Bill Seurer wrote: > On 04/01/16 10:48, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Bill Seurer >> wrote: >>> >>> Is there some way using deja-gnu to have a single test case run multiple >>> times using different sets of compiler options? I didn't s

Vector registers on MIPS arch

2016-04-01 Thread David Guillen Fandos
Hello there! I'm trying to add some vector registers to a MIPS arch (32 bit). This arch has 32 x 128 bit registers that can essentially be seen as V4SF. So far I'm using this test: volatile float foo __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))); volatile float bar __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))); int m

Re: How to identify the version of the LLVM AddressSanitizer integrated to GCC 4.9.3 and after

2016-04-01 Thread Yuri Gribov
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 03/31/2016 05:48 PM, Maxim Ostapenko wrote: >> >> Yes, but please note, that this page describes differences between two >> particular revisions. For current trunk (and release) GCC and LLVM versions >> the situation might be different. >>