[Bug tree-optimization/71503] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "gen_phi_arg_condition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71503 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Committed] S/390: Fix MAX_ARGS value.

Committed to GCC 5 and mainline branches. gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-06-13 Andreas Krebbel PR target/71379 * config/s390/s390.c (s390_expand_builtin): Increase MAX_ARGS by one. --- gcc/config/s390/s390.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

[Bug target/71379] [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r236831

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71379 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Mon Jun 13 08:37:31 2016 New Revision: 237365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237365=gcc=rev Log: S/390: Fix MAX_ARGS value. gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-06-13 Andreas Krebbel

[Bug tree-optimization/71505] -O3 internal compiler error in vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:2596

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71505 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/71379] [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r236831

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71379 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Mon Jun 13 08:34:45 2016 New Revision: 237364 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237364=gcc=rev Log: S/390: Fix MAX_ARGS value. gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-06-13 Andreas Krebbel

[Bug target/71379] [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r236831

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71379 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |target Assignee|law at

[Bug tree-optimization/71503] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "gen_phi_arg_condition"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71503 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2016-6-13 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71518] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/71510] [7 Regression] Failed to bootstrap with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71510 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

Re: Switch to ISL 0.16.1

On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Richi, > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Richard Biener wrote: > > the following patch switches download_prerequesites to use ISL 0.16.1 > > (just put that into infrastructure/). > > > > I've verified it works for me (on the gcc-5 branch and trunk). > > >

[Bug sanitizer/71498] ubsan bounds checking influenced by surrounding code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71498 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Ada] Fix annoying oversight in elaboration of subprograms

This fixes an annoying oversight introduced in the new elaboration model for subprograms in gigi: calls might be generated while the type of parameters is still incomplete, which leads to truncation to the low part for access types on 64-bit targets... Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on

[Bug tree-optimization/71506] ICE with libvpx with -floop-interchange: isl_constraint.c:627: expecting integer value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71506 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c/71506] ICE with libvpx with -floop-interchange: isl_constraint.c:627: expecting integer value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71506 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Re: [patch, avr] Fix PR67353

On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 20:08 +0200, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Pitchumani Sivanupandi schrieb: > > > > Hi, > > > > This patch introduces new flags for warning 'misspelled interrupt/ > > signal handler'. Flag -Wmisspelled-isr is enabled by default and it > > will warn user if the interrupt/ signal

Re: [PATCH] fold-const: Don't access bit fields with too big mode (PR71310)

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Currently, optimize_bit_field_compare reads the bitfield in word_mode > if it can. If the bit field is normally accessed in a smaller mode, > this might be a violation of the memory model, although the "extra" > part of the read is not used. But

[Bug tree-optimization/71518] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518 Bug ID: 71518 Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 64-bit mode (not in 32-bit mode) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Ada] Fix ICE on renaming of 'Pred or 'Succ attribute

This is a regression present on the mainline and 6 branch: the compiler stops on the renaming of the 'Pred or 'Succ attribute of a fixed-point type. Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline and 6 branch. 2016-06-13 Eric Botcazou *

Re: [PATCH, i386]: Implement PR 71246, Missing built-in functions for float128 NaNs

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote: > Hello! > > Attached patch implements __builtin_nanq and __builtin_nansq > __float128 functions. > > 2016-06-10 Uros Bizjak > > PR target/71241 > * config/i386/i386.i386-builtin-types.def (CONST_STRING): > New primitive

[Bug tree-optimization/70729] Loop marked with omp simd pragma is not vectorized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729 --- Comment #26 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #25) > Created attachment 38684 [details] > patch.2 > > Richard! > > I prepared the second part of patch and checked that it does not > produce any new failures.

[Bug c++/71516] ICE on invalid C++ code (invalid use of forward declared type) on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71516 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Re: [patch] generate_libstdcxx_web_docs: Use realpath to get absolute path

On 12/06/16 12:53 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Hi Jonathan, On Thu, 28 Apr 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote: When I ran maintainer-scripts/generate_libstdcxx_web_docs to make the onlinedocs/libstdc++ for 6.1 the other day it failed because I use a relative path for the output dir argument. This

[Bug c++/71515] ICE on valid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71515 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71511] ICE on valid C++11 code (with decltype) on x86_64-linux-gnu: in cxx_incomplete_type_diagnostic, at cp/typeck2.c:567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71511 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71513] ICE on valid C++11 code (with alignas specifier) on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71513 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Re: [Patch, fotran] PR70673 - [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars

Dear All, Committed to trunk as revision 237358. 5- and 6- branches to follow towards the end of the week. Cheers Paul On 12 June 2016 at 17:21, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hi Paul, > >> The fix to eliminate this ICE is trivial. > > > Trivial once you have found it, not so

[Bug c++/71517] New: g++ gives different warnings if compiling a file directly or adding preprocess step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71517 Bug ID: 71517 Summary: g++ gives different warnings if compiling a file directly or adding preprocess step Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/70673] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with module containing functions with allocatable character scalars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Mon Jun 13 07:48:25 2016 New Revision: 237358 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237358=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70673 *

[Bug c++/71517] g++ gives different warnings if compiling a file directly or adding preprocess step

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71517 --- Comment #1 from Albert Astals Cid --- The used compiler is $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v

[Bug tree-optimization/71514] ICE on C11 code with atomic exchange at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in copy_reference_ops_from_ref, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71514 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix gcc.target/arm/builtin-bswap16-1.c

On 10 June 2016 at 11:28, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > Ping. > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00249.html > I tested this patch in my usual matrix, and it's OK for me. Christophe > Thanks, > Kyrill > > > On 03/06/16 09:30, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> >> Hi

[Bug middle-end/64516] [4.9/5/6 Regression] arm: wrong unaligned load generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6/7

[Ada] Improve alignment computation for allocators

Allocators return pointer to void internally so the derived alignment is the minimal one for known_alignment, although we know that it's always larger. Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline. 2016-06-13 Eric Botcazou * gcc-interface/utils2.c

[Bug middle-end/64516] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] arm: wrong unaligned load generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jun 13 07:34:45 2016 New Revision: 237355 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237355=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-13 Richard Biener PR middle-end/64516

Re: [regex, libstdc++/71500, patch] Fix icase on bracket expression

On 11/06/16 11:46 -0700, Tim Shen wrote: On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: N.B. The "typename" and "::type" are redundant here, because it names the same type as the integral_constant itself, and you could use __bool_constant<__collate> instead: return

[Bug sanitizer/71458] ICE with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [BUILDROBOT] MPS430 build problem due to new enum

On 06/12/2016 01:55 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > The new `NONE' from your enum clashes with a NONE used in a MSP430 > private enum. > > MfG, JBG Hi. Thanks for having heads up, I've been testing following patch. The patch survives with --target=msp430-elf. Ready after it finishes? Thanks,

[Bug sanitizer/71458] ICE with -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71458 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Jun 13 07:17:16 2016 New Revision: 237353 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237353=gcc=rev Log: Do not enable -fcheck-pointer-bounds w/ -fsanitize=bounds PR

Unreviewed^2 patch

The following patch has remained unreviewed for two weeks: [build] Handle gas/gld --compress-debug-sections=type https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg02325.html It requires a build maintainer unless one wants to consider it obvious. Rainer --

[Bug c++/71516] New: ICE on invalid C++ code (invalid use of forward declared type) on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71516 Bug ID: 71516 Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code (invalid use of forward declared type) on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/71403] [7 Regression] wrong code (segfault) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71403 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- So, to follow-up on my own comment. We start with 3 nested loops. The first backward jump threading pass threads the backedge of the outermost loop to the head of the middle loop. That essentially

[Bug c++/71515] New: ICE on valid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71515 Bug ID: 71515 Summary: ICE on valid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

<    1   2   3