On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> 2016-12-05 16:31 GMT+01:00 Andrew Senkevich :
> > 2016-11-16 8:02 GMT+03:00 Andrew Pinski :
> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Andrew Senkevich
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> new Intel instructions AVX512_4FMAPS and AVX512_4VNNIW introduce use
2017-03-16 9:50 GMT+01:00 Richard Biener :
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>
>> 2016-12-05 16:31 GMT+01:00 Andrew Senkevich :
>> > 2016-11-16 8:02 GMT+03:00 Andrew Pinski :
>> >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Andrew Senkevich
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> new Intel instru
Hello,
after working on GCN back-end in private branch, we would like to make
it public and invite the community to have a look, comment, review or
even contribute. Therefore we have just pushed the current state of
the back-end to the git branch gcn (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=shor
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:43:20PM +, Andrew Jenner wrote:
> On 15/03/2017 14:26, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >I do not think VLE can get in, not in its current shape at least.
>
> That's unfortunate. Disregarding the SPE splitting plan for a moment,
> what do you think would need
Hi Segher,
On 16/03/2017 19:24, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
e500mc (like e5500, e6500) are just PowerPC (and they use the usual ABIs),
so those should stay on the "rs6000 side".
Agreed.
Are you proposing to take on the task of actually splitting it yourself?
If so, that would make me a lot hap
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 08:38:37PM +, Andrew Jenner wrote:
> >>Are you proposing to take on the task of actually splitting it yourself?
> >>If so, that would make me a lot happier about it.
> >
> >Yes, I can do the mechanics. But I cannot do most of the testing.
>
> That's fine (and what I ex
On 16/03/2017 21:11, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
The e200z3 upwards have SPE units. None of them have classic FP. So it
would make most sense for the e200/VLE support to be part of the SPE
backend rather than the classic PowerPC backend.
Great to hear! And all e300 are purely "classic"?
That's
Snapshot gcc-6-20170316 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20170316/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
