On Tue, 2 May 2017, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I am trying to update the gcc version for rtems to 7.1 and
running into trouble finding the correct versions of
mpc, mpfr, and gmp. We build those as part of building
gcc so we have configuration control over the set.
With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 18:17 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our build recipe:
>>
>> %define mpfr_version 2.4.2
>> %define mpc_version0.8.1
>> %define gmp_version4.3.2
>
> Best thing to do is look at the co
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 18:17 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our build recipe:
>
> %define mpfr_version 2.4.2
> %define mpc_version 0.8.1
> %define gmp_version 4.3.2
Best thing to do is look at the contrib/download_prerequisites script
that comes with the GCC
Joel,
Normally I try building the latest gcc snapshots using the latest versions of
prerequisite codes. Some codes are required to build GCC itself while others
are needed for the "make check" phase. Below is what I use for the whole
build and test process:
#
# ActiveTcl-8.6.6.8606-x86_64-l
Hi
I am trying to update the gcc version for rtems to 7.1 and
running into trouble finding the correct versions of
mpc, mpfr, and gmp. We build those as part of building
gcc so we have configuration control over the set.
With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our build recipe:
%define mpfr_version 2
Snapshot gcc-5-20170502 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/5-20170502/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5
I have a question about -fopt-info. According to the GCC documentation at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Dump-examples.html
| If options is omitted, it defaults to all-all, which means dump all
| available optimization info from all the passes. In the following example,
| all optimiz
Hi FX,
On Tue, 2 May 2017, FX wrote:
> I’m suggesting we apply the following patch to provide links to macOS
> package managers, where users can download binaries for GCC on macOS. I
> have included the two major ones, Homebrew and MacPorts.
did you mean to send this to gcc-patches@ ?
The chan
Hi,
I’m suggesting we apply the following patch to provide links to macOS package
managers, where users can download binaries for GCC on macOS. I have included
the two major ones, Homebrew and MacPorts.
FX
macos.diff
Description: Binary data
We are proud to announce the next, major release of the
GNU Compiler Collection, 7.1. This year we celebrated the 30th
anniversary of the first GCC beta release and this month
we will celebrate 30 years since the GCC 1.0 release.
GCC 7.1 is a major release containing substantial new
functionality
Hi David, I'll send you the forms to complete.
On 2 May 2017 at 12:35, David King wrote:
> Hello GCC maintainers –
>
> I am writing to request the legal forms necessary to contribute to the GCC
> code base (assignment for changes and employer disclaimer) . I’ll be working
> with Johnathan Wakel
Hello GCC maintainers –
I am writing to request the legal forms necessary to contribute to the GCC code
base (assignment for changes and employer disclaimer) . I’ll be working with
Johnathan Wakely on the implementation of the C++ extensions for networking:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg2
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 12:17 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> But this shows
> an issue with GCC 7 so please open a bugreport.
Here it is - https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80593
Regards,
FCh
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> A code that I wrote was warning-free in GCC 4.9, GCC 5 and GCC 6. It
> was also warning-free with some older GCC 7 experimental snapshots (for
> example 7-20170409). But in the most recent snapshot (including the
> first RC), it
14 matches
Mail list logo
