Hello.
Can you someone add 7.1 release to git tags. I guess it's following revision:
f9105a38249fb57f7778acf3008025f2dcac2b1f
Thanks,
Martin
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 06:28:31AM -0500, Daniel Santos wrote:
> Brievity is not my forte, so let me start with the questions. Can somebody
> please point me to the pass and/or function where gcc
>
> 1.) decides rather or not to inline a function,
There are two inlining passes. Early-inlin
On 2017.05.03 at 09:30 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Can you someone add 7.1 release to git tags. I guess it's following revision:
> f9105a38249fb57f7778acf3008025f2dcac2b1f
Everyone can add it:
% git tag gcc-7_1_0-release f9105a38249fb57f7778acf3008025f2dcac2b1f
% git push origin gcc-7_1_0-rele
On 3 May 2017 at 06:23, carl hansen wrote:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 18:17 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our build recipe:
>>>
>>> %define mpfr_version 2.4.2
>>> %define mpc_version0.8.1
>>> %define gmp_vers
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 10:25:53AM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 3 May 2017 at 06:23, carl hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 18:17 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> >>> With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our build recipe:
> >>>
> >>> %defi
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 11:40 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> I have a question about -fopt-info. According to the GCC documentation at:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Dump-examples.html
>
>
> | If options is omitted, it defaults to all-all, which means dump all
> | available optimization i
On 5/3/2017 4:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 3 May 2017 at 06:23, carl hansen wrote:
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Paul Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2017-05-02 at 18:17 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
With gcc 6.3.0, we have this in our build recipe:
%define mpfr_version 2.4.2
%define mpc_versio
On Wed, 3 May 2017, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> My conclusion is that INSTALL/prerequisites.html is wrong on two
> of the support libraries. Someone more knowledgeable will have
> to narrow down the real minimum. I am just reporting what builds.
The listed minima are for the scenario that you have a v
On 3 May 2017 at 16:09, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> That's right. I was asking about the minimum. I didn't know
> about download_prerequisites but that is downloading versions
> significantly about the minimum documented. And they are bug
> fix releases from the current versions. That leads me to believ
Snapshot gcc-6-20170503 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20170503/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6
Anybody else getting bootstrap failures from the head?
gcc/tree-outof-ssa.o differs
gcc/insn-output.o differs
gcc/tree-chrec.o differs
gcc/cp/semantics.o differs
gcc/lto-cgraph.o differs
gcc/builtins.o differs
gcc/i386.o differs
gcc/dwarf2out.o differs
I built from this commit:
commit 8d05cc6f3
11 matches
Mail list logo