Snapshot gcc-8-20170507 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20170507/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk revision
Hi,
I found the problem. It was pretty obvious - we compute sum of times twice.
Once when computing statement sizes and second time by summing the summaries.
because sreal is not distributive, it leads to different results.
I have comitted the following patch. Incrementally I will drop the
code d
On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 10:48:56PM +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> I've got a project which - when compiled with "arm-none-eabi" GCC 7.1
> without optimizations - produces quite a lot of such messages:
It is a note that such code is ABI incompatible between GCC 6.x and 7.1,
so if you recompile all
Hello!
I've got a project which - when compiled with "arm-none-eabi" GCC 7.1
without optimizations - produces quite a lot of such messages:
-- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 --
In file included from
../../include/distortos/internal/scheduler/SoftwareTimerList.hpp:17:0,
Dear GCC colleagues,
I managed to build GCC 7.1.0 on Raspberry Pi 3 (Raspbian GNU/Linux 8
(jessie), GCC 4.9.2). It required combination of specific configuration
flags:
--with-cpu=cortex-a53 --with-fpu=neon-fp-armv8 --with-float=hard
--build=arm-linux-gnueabihf --host=arm-linux-gnueabihf
--
Hi,
I have a question about loop induction variables, related to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67213
Consider a simple loop like
int ix;
for (ix = 0; ix < 6; ix++) {
data[ix] = ix;
}
In this case variable 'ix' is used as counting variable for array index,
but also used
