[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 Andy Lutomirski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luto at kernel dot org --- Comment #8

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #7 from H. Peter Anvin --- Thinking about this some more, this is really not an aspect of __seg_* but rather the section the symbol is placed in. An embedded system kernel, for example, could quite possibly want to access an

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #6 from H. Peter Anvin --- It is probably inappropriate to generate non-absolute address references for these symbols for any kind of PIC or PIE output (as that would require unwanted relocation!), so #2 is probably not really

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #5 from H. Peter Anvin --- The test case was compiled with: gcc -fno-plt -fpie -fvisibility=hidden -mcmodel=small -O2 (note: no code changes between -fpie and -fpic)

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #4 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 41801 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41801=edit Test case: assembly output

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #3 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 41800 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41800=edit Test case: preprocessor output

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #2 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 41799 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41799=edit Test case: object file

[Bug target/81490] x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 --- Comment #1 from H. Peter Anvin --- Created attachment 41798 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41798=edit Test case: source code

[Bug target/81490] New: x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81490 Bug ID: 81490 Summary: x86: Handling of symbol ranges for __seg_fs/__seg_gs Product: gcc Version: 6.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug other/65254] libiberty produces using extended field designator is an extension warnings in clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65254 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #22 from Randy MacLeod --- Yes, the host is an x86-64-linux system running Ubuntu-16.04.1. The cross-compiler was built using the Open Embedded (OE) build system so of course, it's not part of Ubuntu. I did get a better backtrace

[Bug bootstrap/49582] configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug middle-end/81478] By default, GCC emits a function call for complex multiplication, should partially inline that

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81478 --- Comment #6 from Sean McAllister --- FWIW, it seems the compute, check, re-compute if necessary is what clang does. Rather than "setp %al" and "jne" on that, they just use the "jp" instruction directly after ucomiss: 0x004005d5

gcc-6-20170719 is now available

Snapshot gcc-6-20170719 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20170719/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6

[Bug target/48097] new Throw_2 failures in libjava under Xcode 4.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48097 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED

[Bug web/69601] current/ redirect is off by at least a day

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69601 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/69818] warn for C++ functional cast expression on pointer or reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69818 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #21 from Segher Boessenkool --- Hrm, those ?? are a bit worrying, is that normal on x86_64-linux (that is what this is, as host?) I also don't see line numbers.

[Bug bootstrap/25470] [5/6/7/8 Regression] fixincludes/ subdirectory not cleaned by "make distclean"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25470 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/63773] [meta-bug] Restoring darwin bootstrap for gcc 5.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63773 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot

[Bug target/65294] No easy way of setting default Mac OS X target - darwin_minversion not enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65294 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

Re: [PATCH][RFA/RFC] Stack clash mitigation patch 07/08 V2

On 07/19/2017 11:53 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > There is an issue with your AArch64 patch, it fails to apply properly and does > so silently using 'patch'. I also noticed some odd control characters in the > other > patches, but they didn't appear to fail (or at least everything

[Bug target/81193] PowerPC GCC __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports should warn about old libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193 --- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Wed Jul 19 22:05:20 2017 New Revision: 250371 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250371=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-07-19 Michael Meissner

[Bug target/62273] doc: Invoke.texi -mkernel mentions undocumented option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62273 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81489] invalid phi argument used in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81489 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41797 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41797=edit Patch with more strict checking in gimple_phi_arg, bootstrapped and reg-tested This is the patch with which this PR

[Bug objc++/57607] g++ cannot distinguish obj-c message call from c++11 lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57607 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/81489] invalid phi argument used in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81489 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41796 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41796=edit Patch, bootstrapped and reg-tested

[Bug tree-optimization/81489] invalid phi argument used in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81489 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 41795 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41795=edit trigger and assert patch This patch uses the bit that makes the bug easier to trigger, and adds an assert

[Bug tree-optimization/81489] New: invalid phi argument used in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81489 Bug ID: 81489 Summary: invalid phi argument used in find_implicit_erroneous_behavior Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/81463] [8 Regression] ICE in scale_loop_profile at gcc/cfgloopmanip.c:603

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81463 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] 2/2 Add x86 MMX <mmintrin,h> intrinsics DG tests to GCC PPC64LE taget

Hi Steve, On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:14:01AM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > This it part 2/2 for contributing PPC64LE support for X86 MMX > instrisics. This patch adds the DG tests to verify the headers contents. > Oddly there are very few MMX specific included in i386 so I had to adapt > some the

[Bug objc/53905] -Wformat-nonliteral gives false positives with __attribute__((format(NSString,...)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53905 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/81331] [5/6/7 Regression] missed Eh delivery in partitioned function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81331 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8 Regression] FAIL:|[5/6/7 Regression] missed

[Bug regression/81331] [8 Regression] FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/insert/char/1.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81331 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Jul 19 21:06:55 2017 New Revision: 250370 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250370=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/81331 * except.c (execute): Fix ordering issue.

Re: [PATCH v2] Add no_tail_call attribute

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Yuri Gribov wrote: >> So to reiterate, your logic here is that someone would wipe dlsym type >> (e.g. by casting to void *), then later cast to another type which >> lacks tailcall attribute. So

Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/81064 fix versioned namespace

Here is the revisited version passing all tests successfully except 2 that are also failing without the patch: FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/insert/char/1.cc execution test FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/insert/wchar_t/1.cc execution test This is a rather mechanical change

[Bug target/80969] [8 Regression] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue, at config/i386/i386.c:14606

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80969 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Santos --- Created attachment 41794 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41794=edit proposed fix (still needs cleanup and tests) This still needs cleanup and tests as well as some explanations, but it

[Bug tree-optimization/81354] [5/6 Regression] Segmentation fault in SSA Strength Reduction using -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu |x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, |

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #41791|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/81476] severe slow-down with range-v3 library compared to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476 --- Comment #17 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14) > The advantage of doing it as in comment 13, rather than: > [comment #11] > is that when inserting the inputrange causes reallocations we only have to >

[Bug middle-end/81318] [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at profile-count.h:189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #20 from Randy MacLeod --- I can try! ;) How's this: $ gdb

[Bug target/81193] PowerPC GCC __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports should warn about old libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81193 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Wed Jul 19 20:31:53 2017 New Revision: 250368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250368=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-07-19 Michael Meissner

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6506/20616506/build.log That fails to build: ../../../../libgo/go/syscall/syscall_linux_s390.go:28:33: error: reference to undefined name 'regs'

Re: [PATCH v2] Add no_tail_call attribute

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Alexander Monakov wrote: > > The one and only advantage of attribute compared to Jakubs approach > > (or yours, they share the same idea of wrapping dlsym calls) is that > > it forces user to carry it around when taking address of function. > > It's an inconvenience. People

Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/81476 Optimise vector insertion from input iterators

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Jonathan Wakely wrote: The PR shows a fairly pathological case where ranges of InputIterators are repeatedly inserted at the start of a vector. Each insertion from an InputIterator moves every element after the insertion point by a single position. So if we insert 1000

[Bug c++/81147] [avr] C++ for -mmcu=atmega2560 doesn't do NRVO or RVO when class inherits from empty base

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147 --- Comment #6 from Felipe Magno de Almeida --- NRVO: Named Return Value Optimization RVO: Return Value Optiomization It is the eliminiation of copying when returning objects by value (or passed by-value as parameters for rvalues). The

Re: [PATCH] Fix libquadmath regression (bootstrap failure) on FreeBSD

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> This fixes it. Okay to apply to GCC? > Ok, thanks. Thanks for the quick response, Jakub! > glibc uses u_int32_t in all the places of *powl.c where libquadmath > uses uint32_t, and various other files, so I guess it is intentional. Ah, I see. I

[Bug libstdc++/81476] severe slow-down with range-v3 library compared to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/81318] [8 regression] ICE in to_reg_br_prob_base, at profile-count.h:189

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81318 --- Comment #10 from David Binderman --- I am not so sure this one is fixed. I have this code: __attribute__((__cold__)) a(); b() { a(); } c() { b(); if (d()) e(); } derived from Linux kernel and it does this with revision 250361:

[PATCH] PR libstdc++/81476 Optimise vector insertion from input iterators

The PR shows a fairly pathological case where ranges of InputIterators are repeatedly inserted at the start of a vector. Each insertion from an InputIterator moves every element after the insertion point by a single position. So if we insert 1000 elements at the start we move each existing

[Bug driver/51063] gcc does not pass the -Fpathname option unmodified to /usr/bin/ld linker (all Darwin systems)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51063 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/25537] EXTRA_MULTILIB_PARTS undocumented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25537 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/81354] [5/6 Regression] Segmentation fault in SSA Strength Reduction using -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81354 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Hm, the symptom looks very much like another issue I've been looking at on trunk. There may be an issue with the statement->candidate mapping hash table that's responsible for both. It appears to be a

[Bug c/81484] incorrect -Wint-in-bool-context warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81484 --- Comment #5 from Arnd Bergmann --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4) > (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #3) > > It seems I got a little confused when I only looked at the initial patch > > that was proposed, which was

[Bug c/37041] -Wc++-compat refinements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37041 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gdr at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/21759] Implement warning for codes at the intersection of C and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21759 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

Re: Help with RTL expand and a builtins

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 08:57:02AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > On 07/18/2017 04:49 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 12:49:06PM +0200, Martin Liška wrote: > >>Solved, tail call was responsible for dead RTL instructions. > > > >This seems similar to >

[Bug bootstrap/37704] RFE: Need specific version of --disable-multilib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37704 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #19 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Randy MacLeod from comment #18) > 2. The "smaller reproducer with manual work-around " DOES STILL result in an > ICE as does the libjpeg-turbo build as you'd expect. I still cannot

[Bug other/36994] gcc/makefile contains one very long line (over 2k)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|any |

Re: [PATCH] Fix libquadmath regression (bootstrap failure) on FreeBSD

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 09:35:36PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > r250343 | jakub | 2017-07-19 13:12:58 + (Wed, 19 Jul 2017) | 48 lines > > PR libquadmath/65757 > * quadmath-imp.h (math_opt_barrier, math_force_eval, > math_narrow_eval,

[Bug rtl-optimization/81423] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Jul 19 19:31:26 2017 New Revision: 250365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250365=gcc=rev Log: combine: Fix for PR81423 We here have an AND of a SUBREG of an LSHIFTRT. If

[PATCH] Fix libquadmath regression (bootstrap failure) on FreeBSD

Hi Jakub, r250343 | jakub | 2017-07-19 13:12:58 + (Wed, 19 Jul 2017) | 48 lines PR libquadmath/65757 * quadmath-imp.h (math_opt_barrier, math_force_eval, math_narrow_eval, math_check_force_underflow, math_check_force_underflow_nonneg): Define. *

[Bug libstdc++/81476] severe slow-down with range-v3 library compared to clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81476 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jul 19 19:32:15 2017 New Revision: 250366 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250366=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/81476 Optimise vector insertion from input iterators PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/81423] [6/7/8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81423 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Jul 19 19:28:41 2017 New Revision: 250363 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250363=gcc=rev Log: simplify-rtx: The truncation of an IOR can have all bits set (PR81423) ...

[Bug middle-end/81478] By default, GCC emits a function call for complex multiplication, should partially inline that

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81478 --- Comment #5 from Sean McAllister --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Confirmed. It shouldn't be very difficult to do, > gcc/tree-complex.c:expand_complex_multiplication would need to emit if > (isnan(rr) || isnan(ri)) . > >

Re: [PATCH], Update cpu-builtin-1.c test on PowerPC

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:33:03PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:24:47PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > > This patch modifies the change I made on July 12th. It modifies the test > > for > > the __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports built-in functions to

Re: [PATCH v2] Add no_tail_call attribute

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Yuri Gribov wrote: > So to reiterate, your logic here is that someone would wipe dlsym type > (e.g. by casting to void *), then later cast to another type which > lacks tailcall attribute. So proposed solution won't protect against > situation like this. No, it's not "my

[Bug go/81324] libgo does not build with glibc 2.18

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81324 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- That works fine. Thanks Ian!

[Bug tree-optimization/81488] New: gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81488 Bug ID: 81488 Summary: gcc goes off the limits allocating memory in gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug objc/50909] Process "#pragma options align=reset" correctly on Mac OS X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug lto/81487] New: [mingw32] ld.exe: error: asprintf failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487 Bug ID: 81487 Summary: [mingw32] ld.exe: error: asprintf failed Product: gcc Version: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

Re: [PATCH 1/2] simplify-rtx: The truncation of an IOR can have all bits set (PR81423)

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:19:32AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > On 07/18/2017 01:36 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > ... if it is an IOR with a constant with all bits set in the mode > > that is truncated to, for example. Handle that case. > > > > With this patch the problematic situation for the

[Bug middle-end/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||j.d.pryce at ntlworld dot

Re: Killing old dead bugs

On 7/19/17, Yuri Gribov wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Eric Gallager > wrote: >> On 7/18/17, Yuri Gribov wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 07/17/2017 02:25 PM,

[Bug target/34261] Directed rounding doesn't work on MacOS X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34261 egallager at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

Re: Killing old dead bugs

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 7:15 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: > On 7/18/17, Yuri Gribov wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: >>> On 07/17/2017 02:25 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote: On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:23 PM,

Re: Killing old dead bugs

On 19 July 2017 at 19:15, Eric Gallager wrote: > On 7/18/17, Yuri Gribov wrote: >> Jonathan also mentioned something not immediately obvious in IRC: >> logging into BZ with gcc.gnu.org account provides elevated privileges. >> So if you have write access, you should get extra

[Bug rtl-optimization/68988] reload_pseudo_compare_func violates qsort requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68988 --- Comment #4 from Yury Gribov --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3) > Not a commit, merely a proposed patch at this point. Sorry I missed this bug > when preparing the patch. Yes, I should avoid working too late in the evening.

Re: [PATCH v2] Add no_tail_call attribute

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Jeff Law wrote: >> > Glibc people were worried that attribute would be lost when taking a >> > pointer to function >> > (https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-01/msg00482.html). I think >> >

Re: Killing old dead bugs

On 7/18/17, Yuri Gribov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: >> On 07/17/2017 02:25 PM, Yuri Gribov wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: On 07/17/2017 02:14 AM, Yuri Gribov

Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/81395 fix crash when write follows large read

Hi, On 19/07/2017 02:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote: This fixes a crash that happens in std::filebuf when a large read consumes the entire get area and is followed by a write, which is then synced to the file by a call to overflow. The problem is that xsgetn calls _M_set_buffer(0) after reading

Re: [RFC/SCCVN] Handle BIT_INSERT_EXPR in vn_nary_op_eq

On July 19, 2017 6:10:28 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Pinski wrote: >On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Andrew Pinski >wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Marc Glisse

Re: [PATCH rs6000] Fix up BMI/BMI2 intrinsic DG tests

On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 12:45 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:10:42PM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 16:54 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:28:20PM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > > > > After a resent GCC change the

[Bug regression/81331] [8 Regression] FAIL: 21_strings/basic_string/modifiers/insert/char/1.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81331 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Jul 19 18:08:07 2017 New Revision: 250358 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250358=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/81331 * except.c

[Bug go/81393] Bootstrap failure on s390x-linux while building libgo against recent glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81393 --- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Created attachment 41791 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41791=edit Possible patch I agree that the simplest approach is to not try to pick up the definitions from the header files

Re: [PATCH][RFA/RFC] Stack clash mitigation patch 07/08 V2

Hi Jeff, There is an issue with your AArch64 patch, it fails to apply properly and does so silently using 'patch'. I also noticed some odd control characters in the other patches, but they didn't appear to fail (or at least everything builds). Anyway with -Ofast -static the overall codesize

[Bug rtl-optimization/68988] reload_pseudo_compare_func violates qsort requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68988 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

Re: [PATCH rs6000] Fix up BMI/BMI2 intrinsic DG tests

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 05:10:42PM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 16:54 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:28:20PM -0500, Steven Munroe wrote: > > > After a resent GCC change the previously submitted BMI/BMI2 intrinsic > > > test started to fail

Re: [PATCH], Update cpu-builtin-1.c test on PowerPC

On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 04:24:47PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > This patch modifies the change I made on July 12th. It modifies the test for > the __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports built-in functions to use an > #ifdef instead of target-requires for doing the tests. One motavation

[Bug middle-end/81483] spurious -Wformat-overflow warning for limited types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81483 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/81486] New: Class template argument deduction fails with (), succeeds with {}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81486 Bug ID: 81486 Summary: Class template argument deduction fails with (), succeeds with {} Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/81484] incorrect -Wint-in-bool-context warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81484 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Arnd Bergmann from comment #3) > It seems I got a little confused when I only looked at the initial patch > that was proposed, which was supposed to cover specifically the comparison > followed

Re: [PATCH v2] Add no_tail_call attribute

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > 1) recognize dlsym by name and suppress tailcalls to it > > > >this would solve >99% cases because calling dlsym by pointer would be > > rare, > >and has the benefit of not requiring libc header changes; > > Recognizing by name is IMNSHO

[committed] Fix assert in gimple_phi_set_arg

Hi, this patch makes an assert in gimple_phi_set_arg more strict. The current assert allows 'index == phi->nargs'. While it's true that there are access functions that currently use the nargs..(capacity-1) inclusive range, this is not one of them (and if it was, the condition should be

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #18 from Randy MacLeod --- With both patches applied: 1. The "minimal testcase produced by the delta utility" no longer ICEs the toolchain. 2. The "smaller reproducer with manual work-around " DOES STILL result in an ICE as does the

Re: [PATCH] enhance -Wrestrict for sprintf %s arguments

On 07/19/2017 12:42 AM, Jeff Law wrote: On 07/02/2017 02:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote: The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by sprintf and related functions. The meat of the patch is relatively simple but because it

Re: [RFC/SCCVN] Handle BIT_INSERT_EXPR in vn_nary_op_eq

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:18 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: >>> On Wed, 12 Jul 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote: >>> Hi,

  1   2   >