[Bug c++/82069] [8 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82069 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #6 from Markus

[Bug target/71208] [6 regression] mmix: C++ code fails to link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71208 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[PATCH] [i386, libgcc] PR 82196 -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues emits wrong AVX/SSE MOV

I made a silly mistake in libgcc by testing the cpp macro __AVX__ to determine rather to use movaps or vmovaps in the stubs. This resulted in the stubs choice of instruction being decided by the machine flags when the compiler was built rather than those being supplied at the command line. This

Go patch committed: simplify select and channel operations

In preparation for upgrading libgo to the 1.9 release, this patch to the Go frontend approximately incorporates https://golang.org/cl/37661 and https://golang.org/cl/38351 from the gc toolchain. CL 37661 changed the gc compiler such that the select statement simply returns an integer which is

Go patch committed: avoid compiler crash on invalid programs

This minor patch to the Go frontend avoids crashing the compiler on some invalid programs. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline. Ian Index: gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE === ---

[Bug target/71208] [6 regression] mmix: C++ code fails to link

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71208 --- Comment #10 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- A fix for PR ld/20125, set for the 2.29.1 release, has been committed. Does anything further need to happen on the gcc side?

Go patch committed: emit type specific functions for aliases

When the Go frontend has an alias for a struct or array that requires a type-specific function, don't emit the function with the alias name. Emit it with the struct/array as usual. The test case is for this is https://golang.org/cl/62531. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.

Go patch committed: Fix struct field names for embedded aliases

This patch to the Go frontend adds much of https://golang.org/cl/35731 and https://golang.org/cl/35732, patches to the gc toolchain, to the gofrontend code. This is a step toward updating libgo to the 1.9 release. The gofrontend already supports type aliases, and this is required for correct

Go patch committed: fix check for notinheap conversion

In the Go frontend, a normal pointer may not be converted to a notinheap pointer. The frontend was erroneously permitting a conversion from a normal pointer to a notinheap unsafe.Pointer, which is useless since unsafe.Pointer is not marked notinheap. This patch corrects the test to permit a

Re: Byte swapping support

Jürg Billeter writes: > > I don't. The idea is to reverse scalar storage order for the whole > userspace process and then add byte swapping to the Linux kernel when > accessing userspace memory. This keeps userspace memory consistent > with regards to endianness,

[Bug target/81317] builtin_vec_ld fails for powerpc with altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81317 --- Comment #25 from Randy MacLeod --- Any progress or need for additional information? What should I expect over the coming weeks?

Re: [PATCH] PR libstdc++/81468 constrain std::chrono::time_point constructor

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > +// DR 1177 > +static_assert(is_constructible{}, > +"can convert duration with one floating point rep to another"); > +static_assert(is_constructible{}, > +"can convert

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR 81096 (ttest failures)

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote: > On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 09:39 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:59 AM, Wilco Dijkstra > om> wrote: >> > >> > Steve Ellcey wrote: >> > > >> > > This patch fixes the ttest

[Bug fortran/82207] ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

Re: [PATCH][aarch64] Fix target/pr77729 - missed optimization related to zero extension

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:41:33PM +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: > Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > And in aarch64 rtl expansion I see: > > > > (insn 10 9 11 (set (reg:QI 81) > > (mem:QI (reg/v/f:DI 80 [ string ]) [0 *string_9(D)+0 S1 A8])) > > "pr77729.c":3 -1 > > (nil))​ > > Yes using

[Bug fortran/82207] ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 --- Comment #3 from Bill Sacks --- Thanks for pointing that out, kargl. I'm fine with this being closed if it's not actually a bug: it's not causing me any problems, I just happened to notice it in the course of investigating other aspects of

Re: [PATCH version 3, rs6000] Add builtins to convert from float/double to int/long using current rounding mode

GCC maintainers: The following patch has been updated to address Segher's comments. -- rename define insn "fctiw" to define_insn "lrintsfsi2" to match the fctid implementation -- add "TARGET_SF_FPR && TARGET_FPRND" to the define_insn "lrintsfsi2" as mentioned it was missing on the original

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #35 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to simon from comment #33) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #32) > > > it doesn't make any difference if the libstdc++ is statically or dynamically > > linked, in fact > > It’s libgcc that

[OpenACC] Enable SIMD vectorization on vector loops

This patch enables SIMD vectorization on non-SIMT targets in acc vector loops. It does does so by setting the force_vectorization flag in a similar manner to OpenMP SIMD loops. Unlike OpenMP, OpenACC provides the compiler with the flexibility to assign gang, worker and vector parallelism to

[Bug fortran/82207] ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- See gcc/gcc/libgfortran/ieee/ieee_helper.c lines 75-79: if (res == IEEE_QUIET_NAN) \ { \ /* TODO: Handle signaling NaNs */ \ return res; \ } \ See also

Re: [PATCH version 2, rs6000] Add builtins to convert from float/double to int/long using current rounding mode

On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 07:17:07PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 05:41:34PM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > This needs "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT && TARGET_DOUBLE_FLOAT" I think? Which > > is the same as "TARGET_DF_FPR". "lrintdi2" also has "TARGET_FPRND" > > but that is

Re: [PATCH], Add support for __builtin_{sqrt,fma}f128 on PowerPC ISA 3.0

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Michael Meissner wrote: > This patch adds support on PowerPC ISA 3.0 for the built-in function > __builtin_sqrtf128 generating the XSSQRTQP hardware square root instruction > and > the built-in function __builtin_fmaf128 generating XSMADDQP, XSMSUBQP, > XSNMADDQP, and

Re: [PATCH][aarch64] Fix target/pr77729 - missed optimization related to zero extension

On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 22:39 +, Wilco Dijkstra wrote: > Steve Ellcey wrote: > > > And in aarch64 rtl expansion I see: > > > > (insn 10 9 11 (set (reg:QI 81) > > (mem:QI (reg/v/f:DI 80 [ string ]) [0 *string_9(D)+0 S1 > A8])) "pr77729.c":3 -1 > > (nil)) > > Yes using QI/HI mode

gcc-6-20170913 is now available

Snapshot gcc-6-20170913 is now available on ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/6-20170913/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 6 SVN branch with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-6

Re: [PATCH][aarch64] Fix target/pr77729 - missed optimization related to zero extension

Steve Ellcey wrote: > And in aarch64 rtl expansion I see: > > (insn 10 9 11 (set (reg:QI 81) > (mem:QI (reg/v/f:DI 80 [ string ]) [0 *string_9(D)+0 S1 A8])) > "pr77729.c":3 -1 > (nil))​ Yes using QI/HI mode anywhere in the RTL seems perverse and incorrect given AArch64 doesn't

Re: [PATCH] Fallout from -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Ok. > > So here is an updated patch (also fixed whitespace in i386/gnu-user.h > because the indentation there didn't match the nesting). > > Bootstrapped/regtested on {x86_64,i686,powerpc64,powerpc64le}-linux, > ok for trunk? > At least the rs6000

Re: Byte swapping support

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Jim Wilson wrote: > Intel has support for this in icc. It took about 5 years for a small team to And allegedly has patents in this area. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com

Re: Byte swapping support

On 09/12/2017 02:32 AM, Jürg Billeter wrote: To support applications that assume big-endian memory layout on little- endian systems, I'm considering adding support for reversing the storage order to GCC. In contrast to the existing scalar storage order support for structs, the goal is to reverse

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Yes, as Arno said, you need to manually build libada in this setup: > make -C gcc gnatlib-shared This fails for me with x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0/sys-include -L/opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/../ld -c -g

[Bug middle-end/66462] GCC isinf/isnan/... builtins cause sNaN exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66462 Bill Sacks changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sacks at ucar dot edu --- Comment #9 from

[Bug fortran/82207] ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 --- Comment #1 from Bill Sacks --- Created attachment 42166 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42166=edit Simple test program Added attachment to demonstrate the problem in a simpler test program. Compile and run with

Re: [PATCH][aarch64] Fix target/pr77729 - missed optimization related to zero extension

On Wed, 2017-09-13 at 14:46 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 06:13:50PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > >  > > We are usually hesitant to add explicit subreg matching in the MD pattern > > (though I don't remember if there's a hard rule against it). > > In this case this

[PATCH], Add support for __builtin_{sqrt,fma}f128 on PowerPC ISA 3.0

This patch adds support on PowerPC ISA 3.0 for the built-in function __builtin_sqrtf128 generating the XSSQRTQP hardware square root instruction and the built-in function __builtin_fmaf128 generating XSMADDQP, XSMSUBQP, XSNMADDQP, and XSNMSUBQP fused multiply-add instructions. While I was at it,

[Bug fortran/82207] New: ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82207 Bug ID: 82207 Summary: ieee_class identifies signaling NaNs as quiet NaNs Product: gcc Version: 7.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/82206] New: -Wformat-nonliteral does not warn when passing a non literal to vprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82206 Bug ID: 82206 Summary: -Wformat-nonliteral does not warn when passing a non literal to vprintf Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #33 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #32) > it doesn't make any difference if the libstdc++ is statically or dynamically > linked, in fact It’s libgcc that causes the problem; with static

[Bug fortran/82184] [8 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184 --- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Thanks Andrey. I'll get to it as soon as I can. Paul On 13 September 2017 at 21:12, andrey.y.guskov at intel dot com wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] Factor out division by squares and remove division around comparisons (1/2)

Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/06/2017 03:55 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote: > > On 08/30/2017 01:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >>>   rdivtmp = 1 / (y*C); >>>   tem = x *rdivtmp; >>>   tem2= z * rdivtmp; >>> >>> instead of >>> >>>   rdivtmp = 1/y; >>>   tem = x * 1/C * rdivtmp; >>>   tem2 = z * 1/C *

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 13 21:15:26 2017 New Revision: 252734 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252734=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-13 Paul Thomas PR fortran/82173 *

[Bug jit/82174] Null name in one entry of the builtin_data array of jit-builtins.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82174 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

Re: [PATCH] Add a -Wcast-align=strict warning

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > So you suggest to use min_align_of_type instead of TYPE_ALIGN. > > That would also make sense for the traditional -Wcast-align on > strict-alignment targets, right? Yes, and yes (though I'm not sure if any strict-alignment targets have this

Re: [PATCH] Add a -Wcast-align=strict warning

On 09/13/17 22:03, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > >> On 09/13/17 19:06, Joseph Myers wrote: >>> What does this warning do in cases where a type has different alignments >>> inside and outside structs? I'm thinking of something like >>> >>> struct s { long long

Re: [PATCH] Fallout from -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:19:50PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 05:18:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > > In LINK_EH_SPEC you use %{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr}, what > > > exactly do you mean by that? The way that works is if -static > > > isn't present on the command

[PATCH] Fallout from -static-pie to GCC driver to create static PIE

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 05:18:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > > In LINK_EH_SPEC you use %{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr}, what > > exactly do you mean by that? The way that works is if -static > > isn't present on the command line OR if -static -static-pie OR > > -static-pie -static is present,

[Bug fortran/82205] New: parametrized derived types, problems with initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82205 Bug ID: 82205 Summary: parametrized derived types, problems with initialization Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

Re: [PATCH, rs6000] [v2] Folding of vector loads in GIMPLE

On Sep 13, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote: > > On Sep 13, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Will Schmidt >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> [PATCH, rs6000] [v2]

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #32 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to simon from comment #28) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) > > > --with-checking=release --disable-libada succeeds for me too. > > Because the bug appears when building libada.

[Bug fortran/82184] [8 Regression] 187.facerec in SPEC CPU 2000 miscompares

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82184 --- Comment #5 from Andrey Guskov --- program r187 call s() call s() contains subroutine s() complex(4), allocatable, save :: a(:, :) complex(4), pointer, save :: b(:, :) if (.not. associated(b)) then allocate(a(2, 2)) allocate(b(2, 2))

Re: [PATCH] Add a -Wcast-align=strict warning

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > On 09/13/17 19:06, Joseph Myers wrote: > > What does this warning do in cases where a type has different alignments > > inside and outside structs? I'm thinking of something like > > > > struct s { long long x; } *p; > > /* ... */ > > (long long *)p

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

Re: [PATCH] Factor out division by squares and remove division around comparisons (0/2)

On 09/13/2017 10:25 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote: > > > On 09/13/2017 04:45 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 03:54 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> This patch is split from part (1/2). It includes the patterns that have >>> been moved out of fold-const.c >>> >>> >>> It also

Re: Rb_tree constructor optimization

On 08/09/2017 17:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Since we know __a == __x.get_allocator() we could just do: _Rb_tree(_Rb_tree&& __x, _Node_allocator&&, true_type) noexcept(is_nothrow_move_constructible<_Rb_tree_impl<_Compare>>::value) : _M_impl(std::move(__x._M_impl)) { } This means

Re: [PATCH] Add a -Wcast-align=strict warning

On 09/13/17 19:06, Joseph Myers wrote: > What does this warning do in cases where a type has different alignments > inside and outside structs? I'm thinking of something like > > struct s { long long x; } *p; > /* ... */ > (long long *)p > > on 32-bit x86 - where long long's preferred alignment

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou --- > I wonder whether the check-acats exception issues in PR81361 are related? Hum, yes, I totally forgot about this, it might be a good track indeed.

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou --- > OK, I see, that's not been a pattern we've needed to use in the past. > Is there some specific reason that this is preferred over the integrated > case? It's more versatile, i.e. you can build custom

Re: [PATCH][aarch64] Fix target/pr77729 - missed optimization related to zero extension

Hi! On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 06:13:50PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: > +;; Specialized OR instruction for combiner. The AND is masking out bits > +;; not needed in the OR (doing a zero_extend). The zero_extend is not > +;; needed because we know from the subreg that the upper part of the reg >

[Bug c++/82204] New: G++ doesn't connect friend and extern declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82204 Bug ID: 82204 Summary: G++ doesn't connect friend and extern declarations Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/82196] -mcall-ms2sysv-xlogues stubs sometimes use wrong MOV instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82196 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Santos --- Created attachment 42163 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42163=edit proposed fix minus tests

[Bug c++/82195] Undemangleable lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 --- Comment #1 from Nathan Sidwell --- Created attachment 42164 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42164=edit simpler testcase A slightly simpler testcase. The mangling of the Capture instantiation is:

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 68177, which changed state. Bug 68177 Summary: Lambda capture doesn't work correctly when lambda is used in a pack expansion https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68177 What|Removed

[Bug c++/68177] Lambda capture doesn't work correctly when lambda is used in a pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68177 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68177] Lambda capture doesn't work correctly when lambda is used in a pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68177 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 13 19:22:55 2017 New Revision: 252732 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252732=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-13 Paolo Carlini PR

Turn FUNCTION_ARG_OFFSET into a hook

Nice and easy, one definition and one use :-) Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu. Also tested by comparing the testsuite assembly output on at least one target per CPU directory. OK to install? Richard 2017-09-13 Richard Sandiford

Turn TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION into a hook

I'm not sure the documentation is correct that outprec is always less than inprec, and each non-default implementation tested for the case in which it wasn't, but the patch leaves it as-is. The SH port had a couple of TRULY_NOOP_TRUNCATION tests that were left over from the old shmedia port.

Turn CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS into a hook

This also seemed like a good opportunity to reverse the sense of the hook to "can", to avoid the awkward double negative in !CANNOT. Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, x86_64-linux-gnu and powerpc64le-linux-gnu. Also tested by comparing the testsuite assembly output on at least one target per CPU

[Bug middle-end/82154] [8 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9088 in 32-bit mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82154 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

Re: [PATCH] Fix emission of exception dispatch (PR middle-end/82154).

On 09/13/2017 08:41 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 09/13/2017 12:09 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 09/13/2017 04:22 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 09/13/2017 07:42 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 09/13/2017 03:08 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 09/12/2017 05:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 09/12/2017 01:43 AM, Martin Liška

[Bug middle-end/82154] [8 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9088 in 32-bit mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82154 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Wed Sep 13 19:12:08 2017 New Revision: 252728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252728=gcc=rev Log: Fix emission of exception dispatch (PR middle-end/82154). 2017-09-13 Martin Liska

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #28 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) > --with-checking=release --disable-libada succeeds for me too. Because the bug appears when building libada. I haven’t tried with

Re: [PATCH] [ARC] Check the assembler for gdwarf2 support.

On 09/12/2017 05:06 AM, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote: > From: claziss > > This small patch enables the gcc driver to pass dwarf related options to the > assembler. > > Ok to apply? > Claudiu > > gcc/ > 2017-06-21 Claudiu Zissulescu > > *

Re: 0001-Part-1.-Add-generic-part-for-Intel-CET-enabling

On 09/12/2017 09:40 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote: > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] >> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2017 10:32 PM >> To: Richard Biener ; Tsimbalist, Igor V >> >> Cc:

Re: 0001-Part-1.-Add-generic-part-for-Intel-CET-enabling

On 09/13/2017 11:07 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Tsimbalist, Igor V >> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 5:59 PM >> To: 'Jeff Law' ; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' > patc...@gcc.gnu.org> >> Cc: Tsimbalist, Igor V >>

Re: 0001-Part-1.-Add-generic-part-for-Intel-CET-enabling

On 09/12/2017 09:59 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V wrote: > >> Q. Do we need to do anything with ICF (identical code folding) and CFE? >> Given two functions which have the same implementation in gimple, except >> that one has a notrack indirect call and the other has a tracked indirect >> call, >>

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #26) > > likewise with --with-checking=yes,rtl,tree. > > However make check-ada fails with "gnatlib missing, exiting" > > If I cd gcc ; make check-gnat then most of

Re: [PATCH] Fix emission of exception dispatch (PR middle-end/82154).

On 09/13/2017 12:09 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > On 09/13/2017 04:22 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 09/13/2017 07:42 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >>> On 09/13/2017 03:08 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 09/12/2017 05:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 09/12/2017 01:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote: >> Hello. >>

Re: [PATCH] Factor out division by squares and remove division around comparisons (1/2)

On 09/06/2017 03:55 AM, Jackson Woodruff wrote: > On 08/30/2017 01:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Jackson Woodruff >> wrote: >>> On 08/29/2017 01:13 PM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Jackson

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 64488, which changed state. Bug 64488 Summary: [c++11] Expand initializer list with lambdas in variadic template. Reject valid code. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64488 What|Removed

[Bug c++/64488] [c++11] Expand initializer list with lambdas in variadic template. Reject valid code.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64488 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/47226] [C++0x] GCC doesn't expand template parameter pack that appears in a lambda-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||reagentoo at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #26 from Eric Botcazou --- > likewise with --with-checking=yes,rtl,tree. > However make check-ada fails with "gnatlib missing, exiting" > If I cd gcc ; make check-gnat then most of those tests fail too (claims > missing

[Bug ada/82141] [8 Regression] raised RTSFIND.RE_NOT_AVAILABLE : rtsfind.adb:851 on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141 --- Comment #25 from Eric Botcazou --- > AFAIR, the difference is that the Ada runtime (when built during each stage) > is made as convenience (statically linked) libs, whereas libada is built > shared - so there will (probably) be different

[Bug c++/54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 Bug 54367 depends on bug 61362, which changed state. Bug 61362 Summary: g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2 does not compile lambda with template https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362 What|Removed

[Bug c++/61362] g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2 does not compile lambda with template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61362] g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2 does not compile lambda with template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61362 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 13 18:18:48 2017 New Revision: 252724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252724=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-13 Paolo Carlini PR

Re: [PATCH] Fix emission of exception dispatch (PR middle-end/82154).

On 09/13/2017 04:22 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 09/13/2017 07:42 AM, Martin Liška wrote: On 09/13/2017 03:08 PM, Martin Liška wrote: On 09/12/2017 05:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote: On 09/12/2017 01:43 AM, Martin Liška wrote: Hello. In transition to simple_case_node, I forgot to initialize m_high to

[Bug tree-optimization/80925] [8 Regression] vect peeling failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80925 --- Comment #25 from Steve Ellcey --- Author: sje Date: Wed Sep 13 18:06:36 2017 New Revision: 252723 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252723=gcc=rev Log: 2017-09-13 Steve Ellcey PR tree-optimization/80925

[Bug c++/18805] [meta-bug] C++ member lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18805 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell

[Bug target/82015] PowerPC should check if 2nd argument to __builtin_unpackv1ti and similar functions is 0 or 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82015 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 18:01:46 2017 New Revision: 252719 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252719=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-30 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug inline-asm/82001] [5/6/7 regression] wrong code when two functions differ only in inline asm register constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82001 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 18:00:35 2017 New Revision: 252713 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252713=gcc=rev Log: Fix IPA ICF with ASM statements (PR inline-asm/82001). 2017-08-30 Martin Liska

[PATCH] Fix PR target/82066 - target pragma and attribute documentation for ARM, AArch64, and S/390

This patch fixes the documentation issues pointed out in PR target/82066. It may be considered obvious enough to just check in but I'd rather have someone look it over to make sure I didn't mess something up. Steve Ellcey sell...@cavium.com 2017-09-13  Steve Ellcey  

[Bug c++/82195] Undemangleable lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82195 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

Re: Add option for whether ceil etc. can raise "inexact", adjust x86 conditions

On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Martin Jambor wrote: > I was just surprised by the glibc check, what would you consider a > recent-enough glibc? Or is the check mainly necessary to ensure we > are indeed using glibc and not some other libc (and thus something > like we do for TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP would

[Bug c++/81236] Crash when calling a template member function from generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81236 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:40:43 2017 New Revision: 252627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252627=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/81236 - ICE with template-id in generic lambda *

[Bug target/82015] PowerPC should check if 2nd argument to __builtin_unpackv1ti and similar functions is 0 or 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82015 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:39:41 2017 New Revision: 252622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252622=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-08-29 Michael Meissner PR

[Bug c++/78840] [5 Regression] ICE with const variables in templates implicitly captured by nested lambda expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78840 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:39:28 2017 New Revision: 252621 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252621=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/78840 - ICE with const and nested generic lambda *

[Bug c++/80935] [C++1z] incorrect error 'uninitialized variable in constexpr function' when conditionally declaring variable inside lambda inside template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80935 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:39:03 2017 New Revision: 252619 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252619=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80935 - wrong C++17 error with lambda * decl.c

[Bug c++/80767] Eager instantiation of generic lambda body when not required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80767 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:38:39 2017 New Revision: 252617 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252617=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/80767 - unnecessary instantiation of generic lambda *

[Bug tree-optimization/81503] [8 Regression] Wrong code at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81503 --- Comment #22 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:36:05 2017 New Revision: 252605 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252605=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2017-08-29 Bill Schmidt Jakub

[Bug target/80993] [msp430] __attribute__((interrupt)) should imply __attribute__((used))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80993 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:35:39 2017 New Revision: 252603 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252603=gcc=rev Log: PR target/80993 * gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c (msp430_attr): Mark

[Bug other/39851] gcc -Q --help=target does not list extensions selected by -march=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39851 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 17:35:13 2017 New Revision: 252601 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252601=gcc=rev Log: Fix --help=target (Ada) (PR other/39851) 2017-08-29 Martin Liska

  1   2   3   4   5   >