> On Aug 20, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 03:32:01PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>> I'm trying to convert the pdp11 target to use LRA.
>>
>> A lot of it "just works". But one of the test suite files fails in a way
>> that I can't figure out at all
On 08/20/2018 10:50 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 20, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Segher Boessenkool
>> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 03:32:01PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> I'm trying to convert the pdp11 target to use LRA.
>>>
>>> A lot of it "just works". But one of the test suite file
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 7:17 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 03:32:01PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>> I'm trying to convert the pdp11 target to use LRA.
>>
>> A lot of it "just works". But one of the test suite files fails in a way
>> that I can't figure out at all
Hello Alfonso,
On Sat, Aug 18 2018, ALFONSO LUIS CASTANO MARIN wrote:
> Dear Martin,
>
> I am interested in contributing to GCC to speed-up the compiler and I
> thought that the issues related with RTL are very interesting. I wonder if
> still there has not been done any job in RTL compression and
Effortlessly manage your online reputation.
Hey,
I noticed you already have some great reviews on a few different sites for your
business!
I would like the opportunity to show you how the Word Of Mouth BOT at Wombot.io
got over 300 reviews for one of our users recently in about 9
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
P p+ N is nonnull if P or N is known to be nonnull
(and something similar for &p->field and others)
But we already do that.
Oups... I never noticed, I should have checked.
else if (code == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR)
{
/* For pointer t
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 1:05 PM Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:53 AM Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>
> >> On Aug 20 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>> Btw, I can't find wording in the standards that nullptr + 1 is
> >>> invoking
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 03:32:01PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> I'm trying to convert the pdp11 target to use LRA.
>
> A lot of it "just works". But one of the test suite files fails in a way
> that I can't figure out at all. I'm hoping for some help or hints to track
> down the cause and come
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:53 AM Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Aug 20 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
Btw, I can't find wording in the standards that nullptr + 1 is
invoking undefined behavior,
that is, that pointer arithmetic is only allowed on pointers p
On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 10:53 AM Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
> On Aug 20 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > Btw, I can't find wording in the standards that nullptr + 1 is
> > invoking undefined behavior,
> > that is, that pointer arithmetic is only allowed on pointers pointing
> > to a valid object.
>
On Aug 20 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
> Btw, I can't find wording in the standards that nullptr + 1 is
> invoking undefined behavior,
> that is, that pointer arithmetic is only allowed on pointers pointing
> to a valid object.
> Any specific pointers?
All of 5.7 talks about pointers pointing to
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 09:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> C++17 has similar wording in 8.7 [expr.add] paragraph 4.
N.B. C++ adds a special case for adding the value 0 to null pointers,
so that it's well-defined (paragraph 7).
在 2018-08-20 16:27, Richard Biener 写道:
> Btw, I can't find wording in the standards that nullptr + 1 is
> invoking undefined behavior,
> that is, that pointer arithmetic is only allowed on pointers pointing
> to a valid object.
> Any specific pointers?
>
The C standard only defines addition and s
On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 at 09:27, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:44 AM Liu Hao wrote:
> >
> > 在 2018-08-15 12:48, Jeff Law 写道:
> > > I just don't think anyone's ever bothered to catch this case. I believe
> > > there is a BZ which touches on this issue.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, here i
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 7:44 AM Liu Hao wrote:
>
> 在 2018-08-15 12:48, Jeff Law 写道:
> > I just don't think anyone's ever bothered to catch this case. I believe
> > there is a BZ which touches on this issue.
> >
>
> Yes, here it is: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78655
>
> This PR us
15 matches
Mail list logo
