sameeran joshi writes:
> On 3/24/19, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 11:49:11PM +0530, sameeran joshi wrote:
>>> 1) check_structured_block_conditions()
>>> checks for the conditions related to a structured block
>>> 1.no returns in block
>>
>> returns should be allowed insid
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:05:37AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Martin Emil wrote:
> > Hello ,
> > I am Martin Emil last year computer engineering student from Egypt .
> > I came through your project in GSoC and i am very interested about it and
> > want to work on it.
> > I
Hello Martin,
On Sun, Mar 10 2019, Martin Emil wrote:
> Hello ,
> I am Martin Emil last year computer engineering student from Egypt .
> I came through your project in GSoC and i am very interested about it and
> want to work on it.
> I have strong knowledge in C,C++,Java and python programming
>
Greetings All,
I would like to take up parallelize compilation using threads or make c++/c
memory issues not automatically promote. I did ask about this before but
not get a reply. When someone replies I'm just a little concerned as
my writing for proposals has never been great so if someone jus
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 24 2019, 김규래 wrote:
> Hello,
> I was trying to write my application for GSoC 2019 but couldn't find an
> application form for GCC.
> Some other organizations seem to have GSoC application forms/templates.
> The gcc GSoC wiki page doesn't mention any.
> Is the application format fr
On 2019-03-25 3:45 p.m., Jeff Law wrote:
> On 3/25/19 10:39 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 3/23/19 9:49 PM, nick wrote:
>>> Greetings all,
>>> I just got this in my build output:
>>> ar: `u' modifier ignored since `D' is the default (see `U')
>>> configure: WARNING: cannot check for properly work
On 3/25/19 10:39 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 3/23/19 9:49 PM, nick wrote:
>> Greetings all,
>> I just got this in my build output:
>> ar: `u' modifier ignored since `D' is the default (see `U')
>> configure: WARNING: cannot check for properly working vsnprintf when
>> cross compiling, will assume
Hello,
I am Darshan jadhao ,I am a computer engineering student at Lovely
Professional University, Jalandhar.
And I would like to work with GNU on the project "c/c++
Not automatically promote memory".
Email:- darshan18jadha...@gmail.com
On 3/23/19 9:49 PM, nick wrote:
Greetings all,
I just got this in my build output:
ar: `u' modifier ignored since `D' is the default (see `U')
configure: WARNING: cannot check for properly working vsnprintf when cross
compiling, will assume it's ok
../../gcc/libiberty/dyn-string.c: In function ‘
On 3/22/19 7:58 AM, Sebastian Roland wrote:
Hi,
I am currently trying to understand the internals of Gcov. Specifically
I am wondering of the following:
1) Certain Basic Blocks are instrumented with counters that are
incremented during execution. During compilation a destructor is
registere
Hello Sir,
I am interested in working with you in your shortlisted projects on Gsoc
2019 namely
"Add new math.h and complex.h functions as built-ins".
I would like to add that I have a good mathematical background and have
been doing competitive programming for years now.So I think I can work hard
On 2019-03-25 9:29 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 13:26, nick wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2019-03-25 9:25 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:39, Nicholas Krause wrote:
Not sure if this is a correct fix to this bug found here:
https://gcc.
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 13:26, nick wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2019-03-25 9:25 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:39, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >>
> >> Not sure if this is a correct fix to this bug found here:
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796 but
> >> comments
On 2019-03-25 9:25 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:39, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>>
>> Not sure if this is a correct fix to this bug found here:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796 but
>> comments are welcome. If a backtrace is required please
>> let me k
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 12:39, Nicholas Krause wrote:
>
> Not sure if this is a correct fix to this bug found here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796 but
> comments are welcome. If a backtrace is required please
> let me know. I am just sending it to the development list
> for re
Not sure if this is a correct fix to this bug found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89796 but
comments are welcome. If a backtrace is required please
let me know. I am just sending it to the development list
for review to make sure it's OK in terms of my understanding
the code.
Hi,
I have an issue with the optimization options. We are on an stm32 and it
only has a prefetcher, but no cache. Thus it's nice to have linear
default path. For example, we use __builtin_expect in our asserts. Yet
it seems that this does not work when using -Os. I confirmed that this
is not
17 matches
Mail list logo