Re: Detect EAF flags in ipa-modref

2020-11-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Hi, > here is updaed patch. > > Honza > > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK (after the fnspec fixes)? OK. Thanks, Richard. > > 2020-11-10 Jan Hubicka > > * gimple.c: Include ipa-modref-tree.h and ipa-modref.h. > (gimple_call_arg

Re: gcc/DATESTAMP not updated any longer

2020-11-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 09:23:09AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > On 11/9/20 11:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > So I think either new_update must be raising an exception, or returning > > None for some reason. > > Bet we want to add logging for that exception, as well as for it returning > > None and

Re: CSE deletes valid REG_EQUAL?

2020-11-13 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi guys, On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:10:14PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/12/20 7:02 PM, Xionghu Luo via Gcc wrote: > > The output shows "REQ_EQUAL r118:DI+0x66546b64" is deleted by > > df_remove_dead_eq_notes, > > but r120:DI is not REG_DEAD here, so is it correct here to check insn use > > an

Re: Split DWARF and rnglists, gcc vs clang

2020-11-13 Thread Simon Marchi via Gcc
On 2020-11-12 7:11 p.m., Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 11:11:43PM -0500, Simon Marchi wrote: >> I'm currently squashing some bugs related to .debug_rnglists in GDB, and >> I happened to notice that clang and gcc do different things when >> generating rnglists with spl

Sensors Expo & Conference Visitors Info List

2020-11-13 Thread Zoe Wilde
Hello Hope you and your family are safe !! Myself Zoe Wilde, Business Analyst of Inside data view. We would like to follow-up with you for the below mentioned exhibition attendees' s database. Expo details Sensors Expo & Conference 16 - 18 Nov 2020 San Jose Convention Center, San Jose, USA Cou

Re: Split DWARF and rnglists, gcc vs clang

2020-11-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Simon, On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 09:45 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote: > I think I would have asked the question the other way around :) The > > spec explicitly describes rnglists_base (and loclists_base) as a way > > to reference ranges (loclists) through the index table, so that the > > only relocatio

Re: Split DWARF and rnglists, gcc vs clang

2020-11-13 Thread Simon Marchi via Gcc
On 2020-11-13 10:18 a.m., Mark Wielaard wrote: > That too, but I was actually referring to the sections that define > Range List and Location List Tables (7.28 and 7.29) which define the > meaning of DW_AT_rnglists_base and DW_AT_loclists_base. But you could > also look at 3.1.3 Split Full Compilat

Re: Split DWARF and rnglists, gcc vs clang

2020-11-13 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Simon, On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 10:41 -0500, Simon Marchi wrote: > So in the end the logical thing to do when encountering a > DW_FORM_rnglistx in a split-unit, in order to support everybody, is > probably to go to the .debug_rnglists.dwo section, if there's one, > disregarding the (inherited) DW_

gcc-9-20201113 is now available

2020-11-13 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-9-20201113 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20201113/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch