Hi:
If the second operand of __builtin_shuffle is const vector 0, and with
specific mask, it can be optimized to movq/vmovps.
.i.e.
foo128:
- vxorps %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
- vmovlhps%xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
+ vmovq %xmm0, %xmm0
foo256:
- vxorps %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
During cxx_eval_indirect_ref for
*(const struct C &) (const struct C *) (struct C *) ((struct B *) this + -4);
constant evaluation of the pointee yields
+ -4
where D.2217 is a temporary of type C
Hi, the create_gcov tool was probably removed with the assumption that it
was only used with Google GCC branch, but it is actually used with GCC
trunk as well.
Given that, the tool will be restored in the github repo. It seems to build
and work fine with the regression test.
The tool may ust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100224
Bug ID: 100224
Summary: incorrect result when doing double vectorized
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100223
Bug ID: 100223
Summary: Missing early return in std::partial_sort
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845
--- Comment #9 from robert at ocallahan dot org
---
That makes sense ... well, except implementing a full C++ parser and
reserializer is horrific.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100222
Bug ID: 100222
Summary: Redundant mark_irreducible_loops () in predicate.c
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 4:16 AM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 4/22/21 9:58 PM, Eugene Rozenfeld via Gcc wrote:
> > GCC documentation for AutoFDO points to create_gcov tool that converts
> > perf.data file into gcov format that can be consumed by gcc with
> > -fauto-profile
On 4/22/21 4:55 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
There's an updated version of the patch, Jonathan noticed correctly
the comment related to assert was not correct.
Subject: [PATCH] Use STATIC_ASSERT for OVL_OP_MAX.
Subject line needs "c++:"
Please also include the rationale from your first message
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845
--- Comment #8 from Tom Tromey ---
(In reply to rob...@ocallahan.org from comment #7)
> So gdb reads DW_AT_name "func", parses it, reserializes it to
> "func", and uses that?
Yeah. (Actually it's even worse than that, because at least one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:20:54PM +, johnnorthall263 at gmail dot com
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360
>
> --- Comment #6 from John Northall ---
> It's deliberate! I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100093
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100093
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:342de04d993beaa644d0b0087c20bef5dad5bf5f
commit r12-78-g342de04d993beaa644d0b0087c20bef5dad5bf5f
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe ---
reduced test case:
___UTF_8_put(char *a, int b) {
char *c = a;
int bytes;
if (b <= 15)
bytes = 2;
else if (b <= 255)
bytes = 4;
else if (b <= 4095)
bytes = 5;
else
bytes = 6;
c
As requested at the end of Stage 4, this patch changes the debugging
format for AIX configuration of GCC to "DWARF2". This is in
preparation for removing stabs debugging support from GCC.
The rs6000 configuration files remain somewhat intertwined with the
stabs debugging support, but the
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 14:28:24 -0600
Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > enum E { e = 5 };
> > struct A { E e: 3; };
> >
> > constexpr int number_of_bits ()
> > {
> > A a = { };
> > a.e = (E)-1;
> > return 32 - __builtin_clz(a.e);
> > }
> >
>
> I had the same thought about
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:09:07PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> Fix logic error in 32-bit trampolines, PR target/98952.
>
> The test in the PowerPC 32-bit trampoline support is backwards. It aborts
> if the trampoline size is greater than the expected size. It should abort
> when the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 05:02:38PM -0500, will schmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 17:09 -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> > - li r8,trampoline_size /* verify that the trampoline is big
> > enough */
> > - cmpwcr1,r8,r4
> > + cmpwi cr1,r4,trampoline_size /* verify that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845
--- Comment #7 from robert at ocallahan dot org
---
So gdb reads DW_AT_name "func", parses it, reserializes it to
"func", and uses that?
Snapshot gcc-8-20210422 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20210422/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
> On 4/22/21 9:58 PM, Eugene Rozenfeld via Gcc wrote:
> > GCC documentation for AutoFDO points to create_gcov tool that converts
> > perf.data file into gcov format that can be consumed by gcc with
> > -fauto-profile (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html,
> >
Hi,
this patch adds changesentry for IPA/LTO and FDO.
Honza
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html b/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
index 6f58cfe8..bba16ead 100644
--- a/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
+++ b/htdocs/gcc-11/changes.html
@@ -170,6 +170,37 @@ a work-in-progress.
use -g together with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69360
--- Comment #6 from John Northall ---
It's deliberate! I think with this level of understanding of fortran use
in the real world commercial compilers have a bright future! If it works
with dimension set to 2 (whatever the background true
On 4/22/21 11:34 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
As described in detail in comment #4 of this PR, when tentatively
parsing a construct that can either be a type or an expression, if
during the type parse we encounter an unexpected template placeholder,
we need to simulate an error rather than issue a
On 4/22/21 10:49 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
This implements the wording changes of CWG2374, which clarifies the
wording of P0138 to forbid e.g. direct-list-initialization of a scoped
enumeration from a different scoped enumeration.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
On 15/04/2021 10:40 am, Frosku wrote:
On Wed Apr 14, 2021 at 9:49 PM BST, Paul Koning via Gcc wrote:
My answer is "it depends". More precisely, in the past I would have
favored those who decline because the environment is unpleasant -- with
the implied assumption being that their objections
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77435
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94508
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94508
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e1aaf32ddf13cc79fcf146d6b62a6e0feb82be0
commit r12-73-g4e1aaf32ddf13cc79fcf146d6b62a6e0feb82be0
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77435
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92664c058d705fcaf57875f93b4dfc36cf011afd
commit r12-72-g92664c058d705fcaf57875f93b4dfc36cf011afd
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu
For op_by_pieces operations between two areas of memory on non-strict
alignment target, add -foverlap-op-by-pieces=[off|on|max-memset] to
generate overlapping operations to minimize number of operations if it
is not a stack push which must not overlap.
When operating on LENGTH bytes of memory,
Add TARGET_PREFER_OVERLAP_OP_BY_PIECES for Alder Lake and Intel core
processoes with AVX2 to enable -foverlap-op-by-pieces by default.
gcc/
PR middl-end/90773
* config/i386/i386-options.c (ix86_option_override_internal):
Enable -foverlap-op-by-pieces by default for
For op_by_pieces operations between two areas of memory on non-strict
alignment target, add -foverlap-op-by-pieces=[off|on|max-memset] to
generate overlapping operations to minimize number of operations if it
is not a stack push which must not overlap.
When operating on LENGTH bytes of memory,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86426
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tangyixuan at mail dot
dlut.edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94210
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] |[10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec
commit r12-71-g244dfb95119106e9267f37583caac565c39eb0ec
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
Now with the correct patch attached ...
Sorry for the confusion!
---
Dear Fortranners,
we need to check the arguments to the affected GNU intrinsic extensions
properly, and - as pointed out in the PR by Tobias - we need to allow
function references that have a data pointer result. Also the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment
Dear Fortranners,
we need to check the arguments to the affected GNU intrinsic extensions
properly, and - as pointed out in the PR by Tobias - we need to allow
function references that have a data pointer result. Also the argument
names of the character arguments of the subroutine versions
On 4/22/21 9:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 15:59, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/22/21 2:52 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021, 08:47 Martin Liška, wrote:
On 4/21/21 6:11 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 4/21/21 2:15 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218
--- Comment #1 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055976.html
Dear Fortranners,
while analyzing a different PR (PR100154), Tobias pointed out that the
target of a pointer from the evaluation of function-reference is allowed
to be used in a variable definition context and thus as an actual
argument to a function or subroutine.
This seems to be a more
On 4/22/21 9:58 PM, Eugene Rozenfeld via Gcc wrote:
> GCC documentation for AutoFDO points to create_gcov tool that converts
> perf.data file into gcov format that can be consumed by gcc with
> -fauto-profile (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html,
>
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210422 (experimental) [master revision
3cf04d1afa8:0e51007a40c:d42088e453042f4f8ba9190a7e29efd937ea2181] (GCC)
[552] %
[552] % gcctk -O1 -S -o O1.s small.c
[553] % gcctk -O3 -S -o O3.s small.c
[554] %
[554] % wc O1.s O3.s
49 100
GCC documentation for AutoFDO points to create_gcov tool that converts
perf.data file into gcov format that can be consumed by gcc with -fauto-profile
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html,
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/AutoFDO/Tutorial).
I noticed that the source code for
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/i386/x86-tune-sched-bd.c (dispatch_group): Commentary
typo fix.
---
gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-sched-bd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-sched-bd.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93083
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mateusz.pusz at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95015
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Ha, apparently I forgot that I'd reported the bug and fixed it myself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24666
Bug 24666 depends on bug 94924, which changed state.
Bug 94924 Summary: Default equality operator for C-array compares addresses,
not data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93480
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rhalbersma at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94924
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210422 (experimental) [master revision
3cf04d1afa8:0e51007a40c:d42088e453042f4f8ba9190a7e29efd937ea2181] (GCC)
[639] %
[639] % gcctk -O1 -S -o O1.s small.c
[640] % gcctk -O3 -S -o O3.s small.c
[641
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80990
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla.gcc.karo at cupdev
dot ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83818
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On April 22, 2021 9:09:28 PM GMT+02:00, Michael Meissner
wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:10:07AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> On 20.04.21 08:58, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:40 PM Michael Meissner via Fortran
>> > wrote:
>> Is there any reason to not only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100219
Bug ID: 100219
Summary: Arm/Cortex-M: Suboptimal code returning unaligned
struct with non-empty stack frame
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100187
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:10:07AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> On 20.04.21 08:58, Richard Biener via Fortran wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 9:40 PM Michael Meissner via Fortran
> > wrote:
> Is there any reason to not only send the email to fortran@ _and_
> gcc-patches@ but sending it to 13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218
Bug ID: 100218
Summary: Allow target of the pointer resulting from the
evaluation of function-reference in a variable
definition context
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94845
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98847
--- Comment #12 from programmerjake at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11)
> Fixed.
Thanks!!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #9)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> > I think there are 8 those peephole2s rather than just 4 (I've been looking
> > for
> > rtx_equal_p (XEXP.*, 0) in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Bet the new s390_md_asm_adjust code is unprepared to see hard registers there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100217
Bug ID: 100217
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE when building valgrind
testsuite with -march=z14 since r11-7552
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82376
--- Comment #2 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055973.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> I think there are 8 those peephole2s rather than just 4 (I've been looking
> for
> rtx_equal_p (XEXP.*, 0) in sync.md
No, the other are not problematic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I think there are 8 those peephole2s rather than just 4 (I've been looking for
rtx_equal_p (XEXP.*, 0) in sync.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100216
--- Comment #1 from Alex Coplan ---
GCC built with UBSan here, to be clear.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100216
Bug ID: 100216
Summary: arm: UB in arm_canonicalize_comparison (shift exponent
127 is too large for 64-bit type)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
We correctly diagnose the invalid access since r11-1350.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/16617
* g++.dg/template/access36.C: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/access36.C | 25
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100182
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|uros at gcc
We correctly accept this testcase since r11-1638.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/84689
* g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae67.C: New test.
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/sfinae67.C | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Status|NEW
Hi All!
Proposed patch to:
PR82376 - Duplicate function call using -fcheck=pointer
Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Evaluate function result and then pass a pointer, instead of a reference
to the function itself, thus avoiding multiple evaluations of the function.
Thank you very
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100215
Bug ID: 100215
Summary: Improve text of -Wmaybe-uninitialized references
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13495
Bug 13495 depends on bug 16617, which changed state.
Bug 16617 Summary: Fail to do access checking correctly for non-dependent
qualified-id
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16617
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16617
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84689
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3275f2e2af24541f55462c23af4c6530ac12c5e2
commit r12-70-g3275f2e2af24541f55462c23af4c6530ac12c5e2
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16617
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:330cc29c06306ebf7bd3b2d37704cc69944923ff
commit r12-69-g330cc29c06306ebf7bd3b2d37704cc69944923ff
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Thu
The test was added in r11-6687-gbdd1b1f55529da00b867ef05a53a08fbfc3d1c2e
(PR93340)
but placed into the wrong directly. Fixed by moving to gfortran.dg/
in commit r12-68-gac456fd981db6b0c2f7ee1ab0d17d36087a74dc2 after
confirming that the tests work.
Tobias
-
Mentor Graphics
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100055
康桓瑋 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100214
Bug ID: 100214
Summary: UB in arm.c:optimal_immediate_sequence_1 (left shift
of 255 by 30 places cannot be represented in type
'int')
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100210
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100096
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99035
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98601
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99136
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99007
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98556
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99033
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98681
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 388 matches
Mail list logo
