Re: Can I push code to GCC?

Hi Juzhe, Glad to hear from you. You are welcome! All patches may need be reviewed and approved before it get merged into gcc repo. you can send the patchset to gcc-patches mailing list[1]. Depending on what parts your patchset touches, the time of review process varies. Please be patient

gcc-9-20210520 is now available

Snapshot gcc-9-20210520 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/9-20210520/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 9 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: [PATCH] Try LTO partial linking. (Was: Speed of compiling gimple-match.c)

> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:16 PM Richard Biener > wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Martin Liška wrote: > > > > > > On 5/20/21 2:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > > So why did you go from applying this per-file to multiple files? > > > > > > When I did per-file for {gimple,generic}

Re: [PATCH] Try LTO partial linking. (Was: Speed of compiling gimple-match.c)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:16 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Martin Liška wrote: > > > > On 5/20/21 2:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > > So why did you go from applying this per-file to multiple files? > > > > When I did per-file for {gimple,generic}-match.c I hit the

Re: [PATCH] Try LTO partial linking. (Was: Speed of compiling gimple-match.c)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 3:06 PM Martin Liška wrote: > > On 5/20/21 2:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > > So why did you go from applying this per-file to multiple files? > > When I did per-file for {gimple,generic}-match.c I hit the following issue > with lto.priv symbols: > > /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-

Re: [PATCH] Try LTO partial linking. (Was: Speed of compiling gimple-match.c)

On 5/20/21 2:54 PM, Richard Biener wrote: So why did you go from applying this per-file to multiple files? When I did per-file for {gimple,generic}-match.c I hit the following issue with lto.priv symbols: /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/10/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld: error: libbac

Re: [PATCH] Try LTO partial linking. (Was: Speed of compiling gimple-match.c)

On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:34 PM Martin Liška wrote: > > Hello. > > I've got a patch candidate that leverages partial linking for a couple of > selected object files. > > I'm sending make all-host- jX results for my machine: > > before: 3m18s (user 32m52s) > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/marx

[PATCH] Try LTO partial linking. (Was: Speed of compiling gimple-match.c)

Hello. I've got a patch candidate that leverages partial linking for a couple of selected object files. I'm sending make all-host- jX results for my machine: before: 3m18s (user 32m52s) https://gist.githubusercontent.com/marxin/223890df4d8d8e490b6b2918b77dacad/raw/1dd5eae5001295ba0230a689f7edc

compile time real random number generator?

Can We get a __RAND__ macro to generate a 64 bit unsigned integer random number? That is pretty useful for cryptograph so We can do blinding Get Outlook for Android