Bumping this thread. Would anyone be interested in CFI technology contributions
to GCC?
From: Victor Tong
Sent: Tuesday, August 3, 2021 5:49 PM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: CFI technologies in GCC
Hello,
I'm interested in learning about any forward edge control-flow integrity (CFI)
technol
P1997 Relaxing Restrictions on Array https://wg21.link/p1997
proposes copy semantics for C array; initialization and assignment
of arrays from arrays, and array as a function return type.
For C++, a new placeholder deduction syntax is proposed.
The paper was seen for the first time on Friday by SG
Hello.
I've just pushed the rebased branch here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;a=log;h=refs/users/marxin/heads/sphinx-v4
which I force push once I rebase it. One can fetch the branch with:
$ git fetch origin refs/users/marxin/heads/sphinx-v4
Generated output (directly made from G
This is the mail system at host fx301.security-mail.net.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
dele
On 10/08/2021 09:59, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 8:07 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
On 09/08/2021 14:13, Richard Biener wrote:
But I guess using 32bit counters on sparc-rtems might be the way to
go ...
Yes, you somehow just have to make sure that your test programs don't
overfl
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 8:07 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 09/08/2021 14:13, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> But I guess using 32bit counters on sparc-rtems might be the way to
> >>> go ...
> >> Yes, you somehow just have to make sure that your test programs don't
> >> overflow the counters.
> > Ri
