All,
I'm working on porting GCC to a processor architecture that doesn't have
a (HW) stack nor a call instruction. This means that for calls, I need
to generate the following instruction sequence:
// move stack-pointer:
$sp <- $sp-4
// load return address:
$r3 <- return_label
Am 17.01.22 um 22:26 schrieb Martin Liška:
On 1/12/22 16:54, Martin Liška wrote:
There's a patch that enhances git-backport so that it updates commit
messages for files which name ends now with .cc and is still .c on a branch.
The patch has been installed as I've made the renaming now.
Chee
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:20 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 8:19 PM Shubham Narlawar
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:54 AM David Malcolm via Gcc
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 2022-01
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:19 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 1/17/22 12:18, Shubham Narlawar via Gcc wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:54 AM David Malcolm via Gcc
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 18:52 +0530, Shu
On 1/18/22 14:10, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Is that worth adding to contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh ?
Yes, can you please do that?
Thanks,
Martin
On 17/01/2022 21:41, Martin Liška wrote:
On 1/13/22 12:01, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Based on the discussion with release managers, the change is going to
happen
after stage4 begins.
Martin
Hi.
The renaming patches have been just installed and I've built a few
target compilers so far
LGTM.
I've just installed that, the Ada testsuite should work now.
Martin
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 10:08:20AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 1/18/22 09:53, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Technically all release managers are also global reviewers, but I
> > agree the speciality
> > of the Ada setup (esp. the runtime being in gcc/) could have been
> > anticipated.
>
> Yeah, I
On 1/18/22 09:53, Richard Biener wrote:
Technically all release managers are also global reviewers, but I
agree the speciality
of the Ada setup (esp. the runtime being in gcc/) could have been anticipated.
Yeah, I thought that building Ada FE is enough for testing effort, sorry.
I would like t
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:46 AM Eric Botcazou via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> > Release managers.
>
> They certainly have authority on the timing, but not on the contents.
Technically all release managers are also global reviewers, but I
agree the speciality
of the Ada setup (esp. the runtime being in
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 8:19 PM Shubham Narlawar wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 12:54 AM David Malcolm via Gcc
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2022-01-16 at 18:52 +0530, Shubham Narlawar via Gcc wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> Release managers.
They certainly have authority on the timing, but not on the contents.
> Working on that right now, sorry..
OK, thanks in advance.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 1/18/22 09:36, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Martin,
The renaming patches have been just installed and I've built a few target
compilers so far. I'll be online in ~10 hours from now so I can address
potential issues caused by the patch.
Who approved it though?
Release managers.
The renaming of
Martin,
> The renaming patches have been just installed and I've built a few target
> compilers so far. I'll be online in ~10 hours from now so I can address
> potential issues caused by the patch.
Who approved it though? The renaming of the C files in the ada/ directory is
wrong and should be
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 3:11 PM Michael Matz via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2022, Martin Uecker wrote:
>
> > > Because it interferes with existing optimisations. An explicit
> > > checkpoint has a clear meaning. Using every volatile access that way
> > > will hurt performance of code
15 matches
Mail list logo
