https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104708
Bug ID: 104708
Summary: RV64: gcc does not pass all library directories to
linker
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
Bug ID: 104707
Summary: gcc on riscv64 isn't passing entire library path to
the linker
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104704
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-27
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104706
Bug ID: 104706
Summary: make_unique cannot create struct of size of 0 due to
default_delete's static_assert failure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
This is a fix for PR c++/39751 which is an ICE-on-invalid regression in
the C++ parser after encountering the end of file. The one line change
is to check that the tokens cached in DECL_PENDING_INLINE_INFO haven't
been purged before processing them in cp_parser_late_parsing_for_member.
Alas in
Snapshot gcc-11-20220226 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20220226/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95126
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |roger at
nextmovesoftware dot com
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po
(This file,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104699
qingzhe huang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com
---
This patch resolves PR middle-end/95126 which is a code quality regression,
by teaching the RTL expander to emit small const structs/unions as integer
immediate constants.
The motivating example from the bugzilla PR is:
struct small{ short a,b; signed char c; };
extern int func(struct small X);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-02-26
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|c
trap
--with-native-system-header-dir=/<>/glibc-2.33-108-dev/include
--prefix=/tmp/bg/__td__ CFLAGS='-O1 -ggdb3' CXXFLAGS='-O1 -ggdb3' LDFLAGS='-O1
-ggdb3'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220226 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104610
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||104704
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104702
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104704
Bug ID: 104704
Summary: [12 Regression] ix86_gen_scratch_sse_rtx doesn't work
explicit XMM7/XMM15/XMM31 usage
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104699
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
ompression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220226 (experimental) [master r12-7395-gafeaaf4b352] (GCC)
[701] %
[701] % gcctk -O2 small.c
during GIMPLE pass: pre
small.c: In function ‘o’:
small.c:3:6: internal compiler error: in find_or_generate_expression, at
tree-ssa-pre.cc:2795
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104703
Bug ID: 104703
Summary: GNAT 11.2 exception traceback output is mostly garbled
on Intel x64 (MSYS2)
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328
Piotr Grabowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||piotr.grabowski at scylladb
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104702
Bug ID: 104702
Summary: [12 Regression] False positive -Wunused-value warning
with -fno-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
Hi Iain,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 04:02:30PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> > On 22 Feb 2022, at 14:44, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> > On 2022-02-20 12:34, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >>
> >> ^^^ this is mostly for my education - the stuff below is a potential
> >> solution to leaving lra-constraints
I have just realised that I have a typo.
I meant to say 'do not hesitate'.
Regards,
Juan Scerri
On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 at 11:34, Juan Scerri wrote:
> To whom this may concern,
>
> Firstly, I will introduce myself. I am Juan Scerri and I am a student at
> the University of Malta studying Computer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100085
--- Comment #23 from Steven Munroe ---
Ok, but I strongly recommend a compiler test that verify that the compiler is
generating the expected code (for this and other cases).
We have a history of common code changes (accidental or deliberate)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104701
Bug ID: 104701
Summary: MIPS: Nested interrupts won't work with 2 or more
shadow register sets
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64785
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104700
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|ICE on valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104700
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
>From Compiler Explorer: https://godbolt.org/z/PKfrMK489
--prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++
--disable-werror --enable-multilib --with-system-zlib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220226 (experimental) [master r12-7395-gafeaaf4b352] (GCC)
[628] %
[628] % gcctk -O2 -fno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104699
Bug ID: 104699
Summary: zero-length-array is not considered as an array
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104698
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104698
--- Comment #1 from Segher Boessenkool ---
GCC should not use unspecs for any basic operations like this. *That* is
the problem.
To whom this may concern,
Firstly, I will introduce myself. I am Juan Scerri and I am a student at
the University of Malta studying Computer Science and Mathematics for my
undergraduate degree.
I am currently in my first year of studies, which is technically my first
formal introduction to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104685
--- Comment #3 from Gejoe ---
Thank you Richard for your valuable inputs.
That helps !!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Last reconfirmed|
38 matches
Mail list logo
