Scripts to build Cross-GCC, Clang, and QEMU on Cygwin and MSYS2/MinGW-w64

2023-05-18 Thread 徐持恒 Xu Chiheng via Gcc
Hi, friends I have some scripts to build Cross-GCC, Clang, and QEMU on Cygwin and MSYS2/MinGW-w64 at: https://github.com/xu-chiheng/Tool I hope the scripts are useful for those interested in building the projects on Windows.

gcc-11-20230518 is now available

2023-05-18 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-11-20230518 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20230518/ and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: [wish] Flexible array members in unions

2023-05-18 Thread Qing Zhao via Gcc
> On May 18, 2023, at 12:25 PM, Martin Uecker via Gcc wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:14 PM Kees Cook via Gcc wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:53:52PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: On Thu, 11 May 2023, Kees Cook via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:29:

Re: [wish] Flexible array members in unions

2023-05-18 Thread Martin Uecker via Gcc
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:14 PM Kees Cook via Gcc wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:53:52PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 May 2023, Kees Cook via Gcc wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:29:10PM +0200, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > > > > On 5/11/23 18:07, Alej

Re: LSP based on GCC

2023-05-18 Thread Paul Smith
On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 10:52 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > PCH files can "be ignored" in some sense because they can be > recalculated from `#include` files pretty easily. Module files, > however, cannot. This makes it even more important that there be a GCC-based LSP server, if a Clang-based one can

Re: LSP based on GCC

2023-05-18 Thread Ben Boeckel via Gcc
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:25:04 -0400, Paul Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 18:38 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > FWIW, this is only going to get worse with C++ modules. > > There's no reason it should. Of course the right answer is to tell > people to fix their build systems and if they want

Re: LSP based on GCC

2023-05-18 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:47 AM David Malcolm via Gcc wrote: > On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 17:28 +0300, Eli Zaretskii via Gcc wrote: > > Dear GCC developers, > > [CCing Frank, re the systemtap LSP implementation] > > Hi Eli > > > Emacs 29, to be released soon, will come with a built-in client for > >

Re: LSP based on GCC

2023-05-18 Thread Paul Smith
On Wed, 2023-05-17 at 18:38 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > egregious example I'm aware of is that they look for GCC-named > > precompiled headers (.gch), even though the Clang PCH format is > > completely different.  So if Clang (and the LSP servers built on > > it) find a .gch header file they will

Re: Taking Over MIPS Maintenance

2023-05-18 Thread Richard Sandiford via Gcc
YunQiang Su writes: > Greetings all, > > I would like to self-nominate as the new GCC MIPS maintainer. Matthew Fortune > is listed in MAINTAINERS as the current maintainer of GCC's MIPS Port. > However, it has been years since he left MIPS Technologies and had since been > inactive. > > I curre