On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 1:20 PM Eric Gallager wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 3:16 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > -fgnu-tm support has not been improved since GCC 5 or earlier. It is
> > not even supported with LTO. Does it make sense to deprecate the
> > support for GCC 14 and remove
Snapshot gcc-14-20231217 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20231217/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 3:16 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
>
> -fgnu-tm support has not been improved since GCC 5 or earlier. It is
> not even supported with LTO. Does it make sense to deprecate the
> support for GCC 14 and remove it in GCC 15?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
Personally, since GCC
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 8:26 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Andrew Pinski via Gcc:
>
> > -fgnu-tm support has not been improved since GCC 5 or earlier. It is
> > not even supported with LTO. Does it make sense to deprecate the
> > support for GCC 14 and remove it in GCC 15?
>
> Is this the stuff a
* Andrew Pinski via Gcc:
> -fgnu-tm support has not been improved since GCC 5 or earlier. It is
> not even supported with LTO. Does it make sense to deprecate the
> support for GCC 14 and remove it in GCC 15?
Is this the stuff around libitm and that adds _ITM_registerTMCloneTable
and _ITM_deregis
