gcc-12-20240209 is now available

2024-02-09 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-12-20240209 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/12-20240209/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 12 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: gcc 3.2.3 x64 negative indexes

2024-02-09 Thread Paul Edwards via Gcc
Oh - I switched to -2 to make debugging easier: D:\devel\gcc\gcc>type foo.c int foo(char *in) { return in[-2]; } D:\devel\gcc\gcc> Note that my flavor of gcc 3.2.3 can be found in gcc-stage*.zip in custom.zip at http://pdos.org On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 05:34, Paul Edwards wrote: > On Wed, 7

Re: gcc 3.2.3 x64 negative indexes

2024-02-09 Thread Paul Edwards via Gcc
On Wed, 7 Feb 2024 at 23:12, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:02:51PM +0800, Paul Edwards via Gcc wrote: >> I am using a slightly modified gcc 3.2.3 for x86_64 and for this code: > Don't, gcc 3.2.3 is not supported for more than 20 years already. And the i370 target hasn't been s

Re: Will PR rtl-optimization/101188 be back-ported to v13 ?

2024-02-09 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 10:36 AM Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > > We have this (rare?) wrong code bug > > https://gcc.gnu.org/PR101188 > > which Jeff fixed for v14: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/r14-1738 > > The fix doesn't fit 100% for v13 but the PR has a backport for v13 > in comment #16. Would be great i

Will PR rtl-optimization/101188 be back-ported to v13 ?

2024-02-09 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
We have this (rare?) wrong code bug https://gcc.gnu.org/PR101188 which Jeff fixed for v14: https://gcc.gnu.org/r14-1738 The fix doesn't fit 100% for v13 but the PR has a backport for v13 in comment #16. Would be great if this could be part of v13.3, but I don't have the resources to reg-test