https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116121
--- Comment #1 from Jason Liam ---
Note that the error only comes when we use `inline` with the static data
member. If we use the old out of class definition way of doing things then gcc
also starts accepting the code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51772
ASSI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Stromeko at nexgo dot de
--- Comment #5 from
git commit g:c3eef3d446589d9b40c16dfdcc2a084c0dd7025f
gcc-descr r14-10512-gc3eef3d446589d
power9 BE
Linux 6.9.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 04:37:31 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104587
ASSI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Stromeko at nexgo dot de
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115524
ASSI changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Stromeko at nexgo dot de
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116121
Bug ID: 116121
Summary: GCC rejects valid program involving explicit
specialization of static data member without
specializing the class template itself
Product: gcc
git commit g:b110b667c14b7c933a45e5f7291881c46074f4fb
gcc-descr r12-10646-gb110b667c14b7c
power8 BE
Linux 6.9.8-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 03:44:23 UTC 2024
Hi Jason,
For this one the regressions are:
=== g++ tests ===
Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test
git commit g:b110b667c14b7c933a45e5f7291881c46074f4fb
gcc-descr r12-10646-gb110b667c14b7c
power8
Linux 5.4.0-189-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 04:09:58 UTC 2024
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer
Hi Andi,
The regression is ...
=== g++ tests ===
Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/musttail12.c -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
30
# of expected failures 1552
# of unsupported tests 4176
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes404606
# of unexpected failures323
# of unexpected successes 52
# of expected failures 3096
# of un
Hi Jason,
The regression is ...
=== g++ tests ===
Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ...
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/arm_rtti1.C -std=gnu++26 scan-assembler _ZNKSt9type_infoeqERKS_
It wasn't included in the report due to typo in the scripts.
Kind regards,
--
Maxim Kuvyrkov
https://www.linaro.org
> On Jul 28,
git commit g:c3eef3d446589d9b40c16dfdcc2a084c0dd7025f
gcc-descr r14-10512-gc3eef3d446589d
power10
Linux 5.14.0-427.22.1.el9_4.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28
155154
# of unexpected failures189
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 900
# of unresolved testcases 29
# of unsupported tests 5303
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/destdir/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/arm-eabi-gcc
vers
While doing some other cleanups with the properties I noticed that
debug_properties
was not updated for some of the new properties. So instead of just updating the
function,
this moves the properties over to its own .def file so we don't need to update
this nor will
have a conflict in the bit
PROP_no_crit_edges was made checked by r8-2993-ga7976089dba5e2 by
doing an explict splitting critical edges directly in PRE.
So let's remove it.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
Note this depends on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-July/658447.html
git commit g:b110b667c14b7c933a45e5f7291881c46074f4fb
gcc-descr r12-10646-gb110b667c14b7c
power9 BE
Linux 6.9.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 03:27:05 UTC 2024
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 03:23:19 UTC 2024 (revision r15-2363-g027bde11d44)
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: c-c++-common/analyzer/out-of-bounds-diagram-11.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
git commit g:027bde11d44d58e6ad473af3a69dc21b451bcbc0
gcc-descr r15-2363-g027bde11d44d58
power9
Linux 5.15.0-116-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 01:22:59 UTC 2024
git commit g:920adcb55228a5dbe0fe8183e8cc46c8cf7af93c
gcc-descr r13-8947-g920adcb55228a5
power9
Linux 5.15.0-116-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 02:52:45 UTC 2024
git commit g:920adcb55228a5dbe0fe8183e8cc46c8cf7af93c
gcc-descr r13-8947-g920adcb55228a5
power8
Linux 5.4.0-189-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 02:23:16 UTC 2024
git commit g:920adcb55228a5dbe0fe8183e8cc46c8cf7af93c
gcc-descr r13-8947-g920adcb55228a5
power9 BE
Linux 6.9.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 01:50:53 UTC 2024
/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 15.0.0 20240727
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r15-2362-ga9e9f772c7] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52451.c -O0 execution test
FAIL
From: Pan Li
After add the matching for .SAT_SUB when one op is IMM, there
will be a new root PLUS_EXPR for the .SAT_SUB pattern. For example,
Form 3:
#define DEF_SAT_U_SUB_IMM_FMT_3(T, IMM) \
T __attribute__((noinline)) \
sat_u_sub_imm##IMM##_##T##_fmt_3 (T x) \
{
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 03:00:49 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8947-g920adcb5522)
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c -Wc++-compat scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-3.c
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 02:38:14 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8947-g920adcb5522)
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-2.c -Wc++-compat scan-assembler-not memchr
FAIL: c-c++-common/pr103798-3.c
git commit g:027bde11d44d58e6ad473af3a69dc21b451bcbc0
gcc-descr r15-2363-g027bde11d44d58
power10
Linux 5.14.0-427.22.1.el9_4.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 00:17:45
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 02:15:30 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10646-gb110b667c14)
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/attr-complex-method-2.c -O0 scan-tree-dump
optimized "__divdc3"
FAIL:
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/2373/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-07-28T01:49:06+00:00 (master revision
gcc-15-2363-g027bde11d44d) aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
Native configuration is aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libatomic tests ===
Running target
git commit g:027bde11d44d58e6ad473af3a69dc21b451bcbc0
gcc-descr r15-2363-g027bde11d44d58
power8
Linux 5.4.0-189-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 00:18:27 UTC 2024
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 01:54:40 UTC 2024 (revision
a8de69be18d:3d25ce722e1:5cc4c42a0d4de08715c2eef8715ad5b2e92a23b6)
Target is pru-unknown-elf
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target pru-sim
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/torture/pr51628-30.c -O0 (test for
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your
patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please
follow up on linaro-toolch...@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's
#linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 01:31:27 UTC 2024 (revision r15-2363-g027bde11d44)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
git commit g:027bde11d44d58e6ad473af3a69dc21b451bcbc0
gcc-descr r15-2363-g027bde11d44d58
power9 BE
Linux 6.9.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 00:17:27 UTC 2024
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 01:08:37 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8947-g920adcb5522)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
git commit g:b110b667c14b7c933a45e5f7291881c46074f4fb
gcc-descr r12-10646-gb110b667c14b7c
power9
Linux 5.15.0-116-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 00:21:48 UTC 2024
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 00:45:46 UTC 2024 (revision r13-8947-g920adcb5522)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
That is:
```
v4si f3(v4si a, v4si b, v4si c, v4si d, v4si e, v4si f) {
v4si X = a == b;
v4si Y = c == d;
return ((X^Y) & (e != f)) ? {-1,...} : {0};
}
```
is what we should produce. Note this is
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 00:22:58 UTC 2024 (revision r12-10645-g85e3fd8d6ef)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 3:37 PM pifminns deettnta via Gcc
wrote:
>
> using uint_least64_t = __UINT_LEAST64_TYPE__;
>
> uint_least64_t testbswap(uint_least64_t a) noexcept
> {
>return __builtin_bswap64(a);
> }
>
> clang:
> https://godbolt.org/z/z8GTsazf4
>
>
> _Z9testbswapm:
>revb.d
On Linux/x86_64,
a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a is the first bad commit
commit a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400
c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986]
caused
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C
On Linux/x86_64,
a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a is the first bad commit
commit a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400
c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986]
caused
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C
WARNING: Many C++ failures have been omitted due to lack of libstdc++ on AVR!
Only G++ regressions are reported below.
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jul 28 00:00:27 UTC 2024 (revision
a8de69be18d:3d25ce722e1:5cc4c42a0d4de08715c2eef8715ad5b2e92a23b6)
Target is avr-unknown-none
Host is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
testcase that shows the issue:
```
typedef int v4si __attribute((__vector_size__(1 * sizeof(int;
v4si f1(v4si a, v4si b, v4si c, v4si d, v4si e, v4si f) {
v4si X = a == b ? e : f;
v4si Y = c == d ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102677
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116080
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|New tests from |[15 regression] New tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #36 from Sam James ---
Two more fixes are pending review at
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20240506044542.102727-2-xry...@xry111.site/.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92550
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |FAIL:
# of unsupported tests 23181
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-14/gcc/xg++ version 14.1.1 20240727
[releases/gcc-14 r14-10511-g8eae5b065d] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52451.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr52451.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Per gccint, dg-add-options must be placed after all dg-options directives.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/cmpmem-2.c: Fix dg-add-options order.
---
Simple dejagnu directive fixes. OK?
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/cmpmem-2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
Per gccint, dg-do must precede dg-require-effective-target or
dg-require-support. Fix a handful of deviant cases.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/pr25521.c: Fix dg-do directive order.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-19.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/arm/stack-protector-7.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Summary|Wrong code
ed failures99
# of unexpected successes 20
# of expected failures 1619
# of unsupported tests 4313
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 15.0.0 20240727
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r15-2362-ga9e9f772c7] (GCC)
=== gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116120
Bug ID: 116120
Summary: Wrong code for (a ? x : y) != (b ? x : y)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116040
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|powerpc64-linux-gnu,|powerpc64-linux-gnu,
et/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179982
# of unexpected failures131
# of unexpected successes 13
# of expected failures 1602
# of unsupported tests 5113
/home/gccbui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67947
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamrial at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67920
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Snapshot gcc-14-20240727 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20240727/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
using uint_least64_t = __UINT_LEAST64_TYPE__;
uint_least64_t testbswap(uint_least64_t a) noexcept
{
return __builtin_bswap64(a);
}
clang:
https://godbolt.org/z/z8GTsazf4
_Z9testbswapm:
revb.d $a0, $a0
ret
GCC:
https://godbolt.org/z/PabfxP9ve
_Z9testbswapm:
revb.4h
xpected failures 1552
# of unsupported tests 4176
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes404604
# of unexpected failures324
# of unexpected successes 52
# of expected failures 3096
# of unresolved testcases 1
# of un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116119
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
xpected passes 197690
# of unexpected failures239
# of unexpected successes 27
# of expected failures 1502
# of unresolved testcases 114
# of unsupported tests 4292
/home/haochenj/src/gcc-regression/bld/gcc/xgcc version 15.0.0 20240727
(experimental)
Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/i686
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116119
maths soso changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Jul 27 17:05:06 UTC 2024 (revision r15-2359-g928116e94a5)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cb1010a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu z16
30
# of expected failures 1552
# of unsupported tests 4176
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes404606
# of unexpected failures323
# of unexpected successes 52
# of expected failures 3096
# of un
Regressions on master at commit r15-2362 vs commit r15-2359 on Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++20 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++23 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp2a/consteval-prop21.C -std=c++26 (test
/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 15.0.0 20240727
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r15-2362-ga9e9f772c7] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O1 -DPREVENT_OPTIMIZATION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
gcc-13 is okay:
fsub,sgl %fr23L,%fr22L,%fr22L
ldo 8(%r3),%r20
ldo 800(%r20),%r20
ldo 4(%r20),%r20
depw,z %r21,28,29,%r21
add,l %r21,%r20,%r20
fstw
0
# of expected failures 1619
# of unsupported tests 4329
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 15.0.0 20240727
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r15-2362-ga9e9f772c74] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116119
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116119
Bug ID: 116119
Summary: Error building gcc 8.3.0
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/./gcc/gccgo
version 15.0.0 20240727 (experimental) [master revision
gcc-15-2359-g928116e94a5] (GCC)
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target tcwg-local
FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c
5249
# of unsupported tests 23413
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 15.0.0 20240727
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r15-2359-g928116e94a] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/strub-run3.c -O0
Hi Mikael,
You were absolutely right. I looked at the caller and "just didn't get it".
Thanks. I will resubmit when I get back from a business trip.
Cordialement
Paul
On Sat, 27 Jul 2024 at 12:35, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 27/07/2024 à 11:25, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit :
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116118
Bug ID: 116118
Summary: dump_properties has not been updated for many new
PROP_*
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: internal-improvement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113384
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
These fails only when generating PA 2.0 code. The fails don't occur when
generating the default PA 1.1 code.
Wrong code is generated for this line in dependency_58.f90:
b%im = a%im - 0.5
b%re
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a
commit r15-2362-ga9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri Jul 26 17:20:18 2024 -0400
c++: consteval propagation and templates [PR115986]
Here the call to e() makes us decide to check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115561
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3129a2ed6a764c0687efaca9eba53dcf12d1d8a0
commit r15-2361-g3129a2ed6a764c0687efaca9eba53dcf12d1d8a0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d
commit r15-2360-gdab0f35fcb4dd3ba584422013096c4ebc6bff90d
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri Jul 26 15:10:50 2024 -0400
c++: improve C++ testsuite default versions
I wanted to add more cases to the setting of std_list in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115986
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a
commit r15-2362-ga9e9f772c7488ac0c09dd92f28890bdab939771a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3129a2ed6a764c0687efaca9eba53dcf12d1d8a0
commit r15-2361-g3129a2ed6a764c0687efaca9eba53dcf12d1d8a0
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri Jul 26 16:53:03 2024 -0400
c++: ICE with concept, local class, and lambda [PR115561]
Here when we want to synthesize methods
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
-- 8< --
Here the call to e() makes us decide to check d() for escalation at EOF, but
while checking it we try to fold_immediate 0_c, and get confused by the
template trees. Let's not mess with escalation for function templates.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|ASSIGNED
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
-- 8< --
Here when we want to synthesize methods for foo()::B maybe_push_to_top_level
calls push_function_context, which sets cfun to a dummy value; later
finish_call_expr tries to set something in
cp_function_chain (i.e. cfun->language), which
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
-- 8< --
I wanted to add more cases to the setting of std_list in g++-dg.exp, but
didn't want to do a full scan through the file for each case. So this patch
improves that in two ways: first, by extracting all interesting lines on a
single pass;
A retry build has been detected on builder gcc-fedora-x86_64 while building gcc.
Full details are available at:
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#/builders/159/builds/10790
Build state: preparing worker
Revision: (unknown)
Worker: bb1-2
Build Reason: (unknown)
Blamelist: Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116117
Bug ID: 116117
Summary: late_warn_uninitialized should just split edges
directly instead of using the pass manager
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116116
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this is a dup of bug 92954.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116116
Bug ID: 116116
Summary: -Wshadow false negative
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
ector/vcond-shift.c scan-assembler-times
vesrlh\\t%v.?,%v.?,15 4
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes182628
# of unexpected failures174
# of unexpected successes 17
# of expected failures 1466
# of unsupported tests
On 27 July 2024 21:11:19 CEST, Mikael Morin wrote:
>Le 27/07/2024 à 19:23, rep.dot@gmail.com a écrit :
>> On 22 July 2024 20:53:18 CEST, Mikael Morin wrote:
>>> From: Mikael Morin
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this fixes a null pointer dereference with absent optional dummy passed
>>> as BACK
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 1:55 AM Lulu Cheng wrote:
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/loongarch/lasx.md (xvandn3): Rename to ...
> (andn3): This.
> (xvorn3): Rename to ...
> (iorn3): This.
> * config/loongarch/loongarch-builtins.cc (CODE_FOR_lsx_vandn_v):
>
On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 1:38 AM Lulu Cheng wrote:
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/loongarch/loongarch.md (n): Rename to ...
> (n3): This.
Thanks for doing this for loongarch. Once I finish up my patch set;
loongarch should get benefit. Also it might be useful after my patch
set
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
