Re: GCC 15.1.1 Status Report (2025-07-11)

2025-07-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:49:59AM -0500, Robert Dubner wrote: > I would like to know exactly what you did. Did you create a list of commit > hashes that you then attempted to cherry-pick, one at a time, so that you > could evaluate each result and decide to skip it or not? Perhaps for start gi

RE: GCC 15.1.1 Status Report (2025-07-11)

2025-07-28 Thread Robert Dubner
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Schwinge > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2025 11:05 > To: Robert Dubner > Cc: Richard Biener ; Andreas Schwab ; > David > Malcolm ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org; > James > K. Lowden > Subject: RE: GCC 15.1.1 Status Report (2025-07-11) > > Hi Bob

RE: GCC 15.1.1 Status Report (2025-07-11)

2025-07-28 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi Bob! On 2025-07-27T16:00:29-0500, Robert Dubner wrote: > I am throwing in the towel. > > I am chalking up the hours I have spent on this as a positive on the > educational side of the ledger. I have learned things about > git-cherry-pick, git-rev-list, and git-log that I didn't know, and th

RE: GCC 15.1.1 Status Report (2025-07-11)

2025-07-28 Thread Robert Dubner
> -Original Message- > From: Richard Biener > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2025 04:17 > To: Robert Dubner > Cc: Andreas Schwab ; Thomas Schwinge > ; > David Malcolm ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; > gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org; > James K. Lowden > Subject: RE: GCC 15.1.1 Status Report (2025-07-11) > > On

RE: GCC 15.1.1 Status Report (2025-07-11)

2025-07-28 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Sun, 27 Jul 2025, Robert Dubner wrote: > I am throwing in the towel. > > I am chalking up the hours I have spent on this as a positive on the > educational side of the ledger. I have learned things about > git-cherry-pick, git-rev-list, and git-log that I didn't know, and that's > good. >