Re: acceptable diagnostic format characters

2025-07-31 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi James > On 31 Jul 2025, at 21:22, James K. Lowden wrote: > > 3. The last 32-bit Apple machine was manufactured in 2006, before Taylor > Swift was famous, when we still knew where Jim Gray was. I agree with Jakub that there’s no specific reason to single out 32b Darwin, there are plenty

gcc-13-20250731 is now available

2025-07-31 Thread GCC Administrator via Gcc
Snapshot gcc-13-20250731 is now available on https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/13-20250731/ and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details. This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 13 git branch with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch

Re: acceptable diagnostic format characters

2025-07-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 11:02:20PM +0200, Rainer Orth via Gcc wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 22:44 Jonathan Wakely, wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 22:23 James K. Lowden, > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I want to understand what our baseline is wrt %z in diagnostic > >>>

Re: acceptable diagnostic format characters

2025-07-31 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:22:20PM -0400, James K. Lowden wrote: > I want to understand what our baseline is wrt %z in diagnostic > messages. The proximate cause is this change on July 11 for 32-bit > Darwin to gcc/cobol/parse.y: > >error_msg(loc, "FUNCTION %qs has " > -"inconsist

Re: acceptable diagnostic format characters

2025-07-31 Thread Rainer Orth via Gcc
Hi Jonathan, > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 22:44 Jonathan Wakely, wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 22:23 James K. Lowden, >> wrote: >> >>> I want to understand what our baseline is wrt %z in diagnostic >>> messages. The proximate cause is this change on July 11 for 32-bit >>> Darwin to gcc/cobol

Re: acceptable diagnostic format characters

2025-07-31 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 22:44 Jonathan Wakely, wrote: > > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 22:23 James K. Lowden, > wrote: > >> I want to understand what our baseline is wrt %z in diagnostic >> messages. The proximate cause is this change on July 11 for 32-bit >> Darwin to gcc/cobol/parse.y: >> >>error_

Re: acceptable diagnostic format characters

2025-07-31 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, 22:23 James K. Lowden, wrote: > I want to understand what our baseline is wrt %z in diagnostic > messages. The proximate cause is this change on July 11 for 32-bit > Darwin to gcc/cobol/parse.y: > >error_msg(loc, "FUNCTION %qs has " > -"inconsistent parameter

acceptable diagnostic format characters

2025-07-31 Thread James K. Lowden
I want to understand what our baseline is wrt %z in diagnostic messages. The proximate cause is this change on July 11 for 32-bit Darwin to gcc/cobol/parse.y: error_msg(loc, "FUNCTION %qs has " -"inconsistent parameter type %zu (%qs)", -keyword_str($1), p - args.data(),

quote!

2025-07-31 Thread Dana Join via Gcc
Hello, gcc@gcc.gnu.org I'm reaching out to see if there is anything that would like to upgrade, repair, or redesign on your site. I am a web designer / developer that can do just about anything you can imagine at very affordable prices. (Website designs // Graphic designs // Face book co