> On 13 Aug 2025, at 15:43, Jeff Law via Gcc wrote:
> On 8/13/25 12:53 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>
>> That said, I'd like to move away from gcc-testresults as a vetting
>> tool to something
>> more modern. Possibly a good(?) GSoC project, set up github CI
>> runners for this?
> Yes,
On 8/13/25 12:53 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
Having testresults also shows the port builds (as a cross at least) and is
able to build its target libraries. IMO broken ports are worse than
unmaintained ones, esp. if we release with those.
Right.
Ideally we'd have build bots with pub
