Snapshot gcc-16-20250824 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/16-20250824/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 16 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
Hi Jeff,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 08:07:32AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 8/24/25 6:39 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >If the port has a (qemu) emulator we could create a x86_64 container
> >for it and run it once a month/week on one of the faster
> >builder.sourceware.org workers.
>
> That's what my te
Hi Joel,
On Sun, Aug 24, 2025 at 08:28:29AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2025, 7:41 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:53:44AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > > That said, I'd like to move away from gcc-testresults as a vetting
> > > tool to something
On 8/24/25 6:39 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:53:44AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:43 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc wrote:
I think we should have a requirement of the bare minimum for a port is a
maintainer.
I also vote to have a test
On Sun, Aug 24, 2025, 7:41 AM Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:53:44AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:43 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc
> wrote:
> > > I think we should have a requirement of the bare minimum for a port is
> a
> > > maintain
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:53:44AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 10:43 PM Andrew Pinski via Gcc
> wrote:
> > I think we should have a requirement of the bare minimum for a port is a
> > maintainer.
> > I also vote to have a testresults for the target at least
