Weekly news letter for GNU toolchain: Week 1 (August 31, 2025)

2025-09-03 Thread GNU Tools weekly via Gcc
Week 1 (August 31, 2025) * Today is the last day to submit proposals and last day to register to GNU Tools Cauldron 2025 * GCC update: Mailing list update: * discussion about `Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu` https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/6e615 50e-1ce3-48cf

Re: Weekly news letter for GNU toolchain: Week 1 (August 31, 2025)

2025-09-03 Thread GNU Tools weekly via Gcc
Week 1 (August 31, 2025) * Today is the last day to submit proposals and last day to register to GNU Tools Cauldron 2025 * GCC update: Mailing list update: * discussion about `Providing more precise "excess errors" message in DejaGnu` https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/6e61550e-1ce3-48cf

Re: Weekly news letter about GNU toolchain

2025-09-03 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
On Wed, Sep 3, 2025 at 3:24 PM Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 04:02:42PM -0700, Andrew Pinski via Gdb wrote: > > To begin with it will be on mastodon: > > https://hachyderm.io/@gnutoolsweekly > > > > But I might move it over to more blog like site instead of a soci

Re: Weekly news letter about GNU toolchain

2025-09-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Andrew, On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 04:02:42PM -0700, Andrew Pinski via Gdb wrote: > To begin with it will be on mastodon: > https://hachyderm.io/@gnutoolsweekly > > But I might move it over to more blog like site instead of a social > media. Though was thinking about hosting on the wiki. I still

Re: is there any GCC plugin extracting call graph information?

2025-09-03 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
On Wed, 2025-09-03 at 18:54 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: > Hello > > Is there any open source GCC plugin extracting the call graph information? > > https://fse.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/9153/1/hoogendorp10.pdf is relevant (but > I don't know if there is an open source tool usable on Linux)

Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps

2025-09-03 Thread Qing Zhao via Gcc
> On Sep 3, 2025, at 12:32, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:23:39PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 3, 2025, at 09:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 09:35:04PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: > I think I've mentioned it earlier, but -ftrivial-

is there any GCC plugin extracting call graph information?

2025-09-03 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
Hello Is there any open source GCC plugin extracting the call graph information? https://fse.studenttheses.ub.rug.nl/9153/1/hoogendorp10.pdf is relevant (but I don't know if there is an open source tool usable on Linux) Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH 8 rue de la

Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps

2025-09-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Wed, Sep 03, 2025 at 03:23:39PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: > > > > On Sep 3, 2025, at 09:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 09:35:04PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: > >>> I think I've mentioned it earlier, but -ftrivial-auto-var-init= doesn't > >>> work at all for C++. > >> You

Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps

2025-09-03 Thread Qing Zhao via Gcc
> On Sep 3, 2025, at 09:38, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 09:35:04PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: >>> I think I've mentioned it earlier, but -ftrivial-auto-var-init= doesn't >>> work at all for C++. >> You mean that -ftrivial-auto-var-init hasn’t work at all for C++’s auto >> var

Re: C++ vs. -ftrivial-auto-var-init= vs. vacuous initialization & jumps

2025-09-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 09:35:04PM +, Qing Zhao wrote: > > I think I've mentioned it earlier, but -ftrivial-auto-var-init= doesn't > > work at all for C++. > You mean that -ftrivial-auto-var-init hasn’t work at all for C++’s auto > variables with non-trivial ctors? Yeah. Actually, it probab

Re: New AArch64 maintainers and reviewers appointed

2025-09-03 Thread Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc
> On 3 Jul 2025, at 11:31, Kyrylo Tkachov via Gcc wrote: > > > >> On 3 Jul 2025, at 05:35, David Edelsohn via Gcc wrote: >> >> I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has appointed >> Tamar Christina as AArch64 maintainer. I am pleased to announce that the >> GCC Steering

Re: git repo locked?

2025-09-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 10:47, Andre Vehreschild via Gcc wrote: > > Er, well, I missed to tell what I did to the branch: > > - rebased to current master, > - reverted a squashed commit, and > - applied 8 separate commits. > > So nothing spectacular. Nothing I would expect anything to chew on for so

Re: git repo locked?

2025-09-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 11:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Sept 2025 at 10:47, Andre Vehreschild via Gcc > wrote: > > > > Er, well, I missed to tell what I did to the branch: > > > > - rebased to current master, > > - reverted a squashed commit, and > > - applied 8 separate commits. > >

Re: git repo locked?

2025-09-03 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 11:01 AM Rainer Orth via Gcc wrote: > > I'm currently trying to push to the repo for an hour, but only get > > remote: - > remote: -- Another user is currently pushing changes to this repository. -- > remo

Re: git repo locked?

2025-09-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:39:18AM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > I am pushing to gfortran-test. The process seems to be finished, but is not > returning (sorry it's in German): > > Objekte aufzählen: 11679, fertig. > Zähle Objekte: 100% (11679/11679), fertig. > Delta-Kompression