rison.
Wish Wu
--
From:Dmitry Vyukov
Time:2017 Sep 3 (Sun) 19:05
To:Wish Wu
Cc:Jakub Jelinek ; gcc ; gcc-patches
; Jeff Law ; wishwu007
Subject:Re: Add support to trace comparison instructions and switch statements
On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 12:38 PM, 吴潍浠(此
Hi
I will update the patch according to your requirements, and with some my
suggestions.
It will take me one or two days.
Wish Wu
--
From:Dmitry Vyukov
Time:2017 Sep 3 (Sun) 18:21
To:Jakub Jelinek
Cc:Wish Wu ; gcc ; gcc-patches
;
les.
With
--
From:Jeff Law
Time:2017 Jul 14 (Fri) 15:37
To:Wish Wu ; gcc ; gcc-patches
Cc:wishwu007
Subject:Re: Add support to trace comparison instructions and switch statements
On 07/10/2017 06:07 AM, 吴潍浠(此彼) wrote:
> Hi
>
> I write some codes to make gcc
Hi
Implementing __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp[1248]_const is OK .
And I will try to find some determinate way to judge this comparison is for
loop or not.
Because all the loops(for() or while()) seem to be transformed to "if" and
"goto" before running sancov pass.
Does it necessary to include APIs
Hi
I write some codes to make gcc support comparison-guided fuzzing.
It is very like
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/SanitizerCoverage.html#tracing-data-flow .
With -fsanitize-coverage=trace-cmp the compiler will insert extra
instrumentation around comparison instructions and switch statements.
I thi
