On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:37:13PM +0200, Tobias Schlüter wrote:
Markus Milleder wrote:
Adrian Bunk schrieb am 13.10.2008 17:41:15:
E.g. the next stable release of Debian will likely ship with 2.3.1 .
So in this specific case fulfilling a 2.3.1 requirement would be easy,
while a 2.3.2
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Markus Milleder wrote:
Adrian Bunk schrieb am 13.10.2008 17:41:15:
...
And upgrading from 2.3.1 to let's say 3.0.0 might be a bad choice if
the new version contains regressions.
That's why I said before branching, this gives a time window to detect
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 04:42:08PM +0200, Markus Milleder wrote:
Vincent Lefevre schrieb am 13.10.2008 16:16:38:
On 2008-10-07 21:42:30 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
But is there any need to upgrade to 2.3.2 since it would fix a bug
gcc ran into?
FYI, GCC can be affected by some bugs
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:10:04PM -0700, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
From: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:33:48PM -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
Since we're in stage3, I'm raising the issue of the MPFR version we
require for GCC, just as in last year's stage3 for gcc-4.3
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:33:48PM -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
Since we're in stage3, I'm raising the issue of the MPFR version we
require for GCC, just as in last year's stage3 for gcc-4.3:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-12/msg00298.html
I'd like to increase the minimum MPFR version to
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:59:21PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008, Chris Lattner wrote:
On Mar 5, 2008, at 1:34 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Richard Guenther wrote:
We didn't yet run into this issue and build openSUSE with 4.3 since more
than
three month.
