RE: dump after RTL expand

2007-01-12 Thread Andrija Radicevic
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Brook Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:34 AM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Steven Bosscher; Andrija Radicevic Subject: Re: dump after RTL expand On Thursday 11 January 2007 19:27, Steven Bosscher

rtl dumps

2006-12-01 Thread Andrija Radicevic
Hi, I have noticed that the INSN_CODE for all patterns in the rtl dumps .00.expand are -1 ... does this mean that the .md file was not used for the initial RTL generation? best regards Andrija Radicevic

insn field INSN_CODE

2006-11-29 Thread Andrija Radicevic
} (insn_list:REG_DEP_TRUE 543 (nil)) ;#(nil)) Best regards Andrija Radicevic

error in GCC Internals Manual

2006-11-24 Thread Andrija Radicevic
of the expression (const_double:m addr i0 i1 ...). More precise, all the paragraphs starting from the 4th (begins with addr is used to contain the mem ...), should be moved up to the description of (const_double:m addr i0 i1 ...). Though, I have some doubts regarding the last paragraph. Best regards Andrija

error in GCC Internals Manual

2006-11-24 Thread Andrija Radicevic
of the expression (const_double:m addr i0 i1 ...). More precise, all the paragraphs starting from the 4th (begins with addr is used to contain the mem ...), should be moved up to the description of (const_double:m addr i0 i1 ...). Though, I have some doubts regarding the last paragraph. Best regards Andrija

problems with labels

2006-10-05 Thread Andrija Radicevic
Hi, I'm trying to adjust an already existing target port of gcc-2.95.2 to gcc-4.1.0 and I came to a point where I could use some help. Everything seams fine until xgcc tries to compile libgcc2.c, then I get the following error messages: libgcc2.s: Assembler messages: libgcc2.s:52: Error:

Re: problems with labels

2006-10-05 Thread Andrija Radicevic
Does your generate look substantially different from: #undef ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL #define ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL(LABEL,PREFIX,NUM) \ sprintf (LABEL, *%s%ld, PREFIX, (long)(NUM)) Hint, I put it outputs a label, which is wrong (or calls something that does). no, it's simple