Re: [Patch, stage-1, RFC]: i386: attribute regparm/stdcall and vaargs

2024-02-02 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
Hi Joseph! On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 14:54:49 + (UTC) Joseph Myers wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2024, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc wrote: > > > * builtin-attrs.def (ATTR_TM_NOTHROW_RT_LIST): Use ATTR_NOTHROW_LIST > > instead of ATTR_TM_NOTHROW_LIST, thus removi

[Patch, stage-1, RFC]: i386: attribute regparm/stdcall and vaargs

2024-01-29 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
[I was torn towards asking gcc@ only, individual i386 maintainers in private or bluntly asking for help on gcc-patches or re-iterate through ABI, so in an attempt to cut off years of latency i hereby ask all and everybody for assistance. Stage4 means any chances are low, i know.. hence stage 1 mate

Re: libsanitizer: sync from master

2023-04-28 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
On 28 April 2023 11:23:55 CEST, Florian Weimer via Fortran wrote: >* Martin Liška: >But that's okay for me as well. Even better.

Re: libsanitizer: sync from master

2023-04-26 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
On 26 April 2023 20:31:10 CEST, Florian Weimer via Fortran wrote: >* Martin Liška: > >> On 11/15/22 16:47, Martin Liška wrote: >>> Hi. >>> >>> I've just pushed libsanitizer update that was tested on x86_64-linux and >>> ppc64le-linux systems. >>> Moreover, I run bootstrap on x86_64-linux and ch

Re: GSoC Blog Post 0 - GCCprefab build system

2022-06-18 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
On 17 June 2022 21:55:47 CEST, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 08:45:04PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc >wrote: >> PS: we should rm >> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=contrib/gcc_build > >No. gcc_build is used by maintainer-scripts/gc

Re: GSoC Blog Post 0 - GCCprefab build system

2022-06-17 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
On 13 June 2022 17:26:59 CEST, Jonathan Wakely via Fortran wrote: >https://gist.github.com/jwakely/95b3a790157f55d75e18f577e12b50d7#file-build_gcc_versions-sh s/[[/[/ s/==/=/ The former are deprecated or obsolescent notations of test(1) syntax, fwiw. PS: we should rm https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?

Re: [PATCH] git-backport: support renamed .cc files in commit message.

2022-01-13 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:54:46 +0100 Martin Liška wrote: > +def replace_file_in_changelog(lines, filename): > +if not filename.endswith('.cc'): > +return > + > +# consider all componenets of a path: gcc/ipa-icf.cc > +while filename: > +for i, line in enumerate(lines): >

[PATCH] Bump required minimum DejaGnu version to 1.5.3

2021-10-28 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer Bump required DejaGnu version to 1.5.3 (or later). Ok for trunk? gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/install.texi: Bump required minimum DejaGnu version. --- gcc/doc/install.texi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/

Re: dejagnu version update?

2021-10-27 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 18:32:24 +0200 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 21:08, Mike Stump wrote: > > > > On May 16, 2017, at 5:16 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > The change I care about in 1.5.3 > > > > So, we haven't talked much about the version people want most.

Re: RFC: Sphinx for GCC documentation

2021-06-07 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 15:30:22 +0200 Martin Liška wrote: > Anyway, this is resolved as I use more appropriate directive: > https://splichal.eu/scripts/sphinx/gfortran/_build/html/intrinsic-procedures/access-checks-file-access-modes.html ISTM there's a typo s/Tailing/Trailing/ in gcc/fortran/intrins