[Bug fortran/103301] New: co_broadcast: broadcast of an object of a derived type with custom assignment operator defined

2021-11-17 Thread xavier.daura at uab dot cat via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: xavier.daura at uab dot cat Target Milestone: --- Before making a full report, I'd like to specify first the case, since I am not sure whether

[Bug c/39121] New: strange behavior of a chain of operations.

2009-02-06 Thread nospam at pamies dot cat
: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: nospam at pamies dot cat http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39121

[Bug c/39121] strange behavior in chained operations

2009-02-06 Thread nospam at pamies dot cat
--- Comment #2 from nospam at pamies dot cat 2009-02-06 21:07 --- Is not the same bug as #15145. I agree with you that there is just one sequence point, but the operation is not undefined. void swap(int *a, int *b) { *a ^= *b ^= *a ^= *b; } This code should be compiled

Re: I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)

2007-06-20 Thread CaT
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 07:31:44PM -0700, michael.a wrote: michael.a wrote: I should probably just find that Debian patch and install into the system directories, but I still don't understand if there are any factors outside of gcc necessary for a successful build (could glibc be related to

[Bug c++/22243] New: array dimensioned to zero via template parameter yields parse error

2005-06-30 Thread guido at grumpy-cat dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: guido at grumpy-cat dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id