On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 03:31:46PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote:
> Here is one implementation of ELF sharable section proposal:
>
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/generic-abi/browse_thread/thread/bca08f6560f61b0d
>
> Several people have expressed interests. I post it here for comments.
> I used OS
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 03:32:45PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> I created a Google group to discuss generic ABI:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/generic-abi
>
> It is by membership only. Let me know if you are interested.
What's this supposed to be? Reinventing the doomed iBCS2?
On Sun, Jun 25, 2006 at 05:02:41PM -0700, Alexander Verhaeghe wrote:
> Quote Jan-Benedict Glaw "So please shut up now."
>
> Quite friendly I must say, it's the german way I
> suppose of handling things?
>
> To Jan-Benedict Glaw I WON'T SHUT UP because of "Free
> as in Freedom"!
That's fine. Jus
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 01:29:05AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> It sounds like you're interested in MinGW. If you really wanted to
> help MinGW users, you'd fix MinGW so that it supported these the same
> way that DJGPP and Cygwin do, for *all* MinGW applications, not just
> gcc. I'd have to have t
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:50:32PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> I've created a new 4.2 Project page for "response files", which is
> what Microsoft calls files that contain command-line options.
> Conventionally, if you pass "@file" as an argument to a program, the
> file is read, and the conte
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:14:42PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the above may imply for your ongoing discussion, tough...
>
> Well, if I were running the show, the 'clock' would only start running
> when it was consensus among the libstdc++ developers that the soname
> would n
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:33:35PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> On Wed, 18 May 2005 10:05:34 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > No hacks needed; you just have to embrace reality.
>
> The reality is that 95% of computers run Windows which is very good at
> supporting developers who distribute binaries in th
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:27:50PM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
> The biggest problem really is that this sort of thing is a lot of effort
> for your average evenings-and-weekends open source hacker who wants to
> distribute Linux binaries to his end users. Setting up and maintaining a
> dedicated buil
