request of copyright assignment form

2006-07-04 Thread Daniel Franke
HI all. Could someone please send me the "copyright assignment form"? Thanks. Daniel

build error: gcc/gcc/gimplify.c:424: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2006-10-28 Thread Daniel Franke
SVN revision: 118109 Configured as: --prefix=$(installdir) --enable-bootstrap --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --disable-nls --program-suffix=-svn --enable-languages=c,fortran Command: make bootstrap-lean Host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

bootstrapping r118945 failed

2006-11-17 Thread Daniel Franke
SVN revision: 118945 Host: i686-pc-linux-gnu /home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/daniel/svn-build/gcc-head/./g cc/ -B/home/daniel/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-svn//i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/home/dan iel/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-svn//i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /home/daniel/i686 -pc-linux

[gomp, documentation] libgomp/NOTES

2006-11-18 Thread Daniel Franke
In the wake of PR28209 ([G]OMP environment variables undocumented), I came across libgomp/NOTES: "Notes on the external ABI presented by libgomp. This ought to get transformed into proper documentation at some point." Would a 1:1 transcription to texinfo suffice for the moment being? E.g. some

[gomp] distributing libgomp/libgomp.info ?

2006-11-22 Thread Daniel Franke
To the gcc packagers: Shall libgomp/libgomp.info ever be distributed, i.e. is there any reason to add the --enable-generated-files-in-srcdir flag from gcc/configure.ac to libgomp/configure.ac as well? The tarball of 4.1.1 includes fastjar/fastjar.info, but not libiberty/libiberty.info. The co

Re: [gomp] distributing libgomp/libgomp.info ?

2006-11-23 Thread Daniel Franke
On Thursday 23 November 2006 05:11, you wrote: > On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 22:52 +0100, Daniel Franke wrote: > > The tarball of 4.1.1 includes fastjar/fastjar.info, but not > > libiberty/libiberty.info. The config file fastjar/configure.ac has the > > enable-...-srcdir flag, l

[fixincludes] PR29867 - building libgfortran fails

2006-12-19 Thread Daniel Franke
Hi all, I spent the last couple of hours tracking down PR29867 through fixincludes. Now, as the actual problem is identified, I lack the knowledge to fix it appropriately. Could someone more involved with fixincludes comment on this? Thanks. The problem: fixes "glibc_c99_inline_1" and "glibc_

x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')

2006-12-23 Thread Daniel Franke
host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu revision: r120172 configured as: ../../svn/gcc-head/configure --prefix=$(localpath) --with-gmp=$(localpath)/gmp-4.2.1 --with-mpfr=$(localpath)/mpfr-2.2.1 --enable-bootstrap --enable-threads=posix --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --program-suffix=-svn --disa

Re: x86_64, r120172: bootstrap error (In function `null_or_integer_zerop': undefined reference to `integer_zerop')

2006-12-23 Thread Daniel Franke
On Saturday 23 December 2006 23:35, Andrew Pinski wrote: > On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 18:32 +0100, Daniel Franke wrote: > > host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > > revision: r120172 > > Even though I could not reproduce this failure. The problem is simple > and obvious. vec.c

gfortran+libcpp: linking objects from c-compiler

2008-04-15 Thread Daniel Franke
Hi all. To integrate libcpp into gfortran, I copy/adapt quite some code from the c frontend. For include-path handling, I found that I can nicely re-use the functions defined in c-incpath.c and exported by c-incpath.h. Now, linking gfortran, the linker of course complains about undefined refer

in asm: where does ".zero 2102063220" come from?

2009-12-26 Thread Daniel Franke
Hi all. I'm in the process of revamping the fortran-frontend to use trees instead of linked lists in its array-constructor representation (initial patch at [1]). By now, I'm hunting down the last regressions. For one regression, I have no idea how to deal with it. The problem: for some reason

Re: in asm: where does ".zero 2102063220" come from?

2009-12-27 Thread Daniel Franke
On Sunday 27 December 2009 07:09:08 Jerry DeLisle wrote: > Daniel Franke wrote: > > The problem: for some reason the .o file for a small fortran program may > > be blown up to multiple GB. The diff below shows the differences in > > assembler of the testcase gfortran.dg/actu

Re: Regression in gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90

2007-05-05 Thread Daniel Franke
On Saturday 05 May 2007 17:57:30 Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > This has appeared in recent days, with any level of optimization other > than none at all. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] prs]# /svn-4.3/bin/gfortran -static -O1 > $test/../gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/st_function.f90 > /svn/trunk/gcc/testsui

FYI: gcc/print-rtl.c (print_rtx) does not build with -Werror

2007-05-14 Thread Daniel Franke
SVN update to revision 124718, configured as: ../../svn/gcc/configure --prefix=/home/daniel/nfs/packages/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc --with-gmp=/home/daniel/nfs/packages/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gmp-4.2.1/ --with-mpfr=/home/daniel/nfs/packages/i686-pc-linux-gnu/mpfr-2.2.1 --disable-nls --enable-threads=po

gcc-4.2 manuals: GNU OpenMP Manual?

2007-05-17 Thread Daniel Franke
Should section "GCC 4.2.0 manuals" of http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ not also list the "GNU OpenMP Manual" that is available for 4.2? Thanks Daniel

question on optimizing calls to library functions

2008-12-10 Thread Daniel Franke
Hi all. While looking at PR fortran/22572, I wondered where the difference between the following two programs might be: $> cat matmul.f90 REAL, DIMENSION(1,1), PARAMETER :: a = 1.0, b = 2.0 REAL, DIMENSION(1,1) :: c c = MATMUL(a, b) c = MATMUL(a, b) end $> cat sin.f90 REAL, DIMENSION(

Re: Steve Kargle and Daniel Franke - reviewers.

2009-01-11 Thread Daniel Franke
On Saturday 10 January 2009 19:06:48 Toon Moene wrote: > Now, however, I want to congratulate Daniel Franke and Steve Kargle (who > has been a GNU Fortran maintainer before) with their new status of > "reviewer". > > Thanks Daniel and Steve, for (re-)joining the club !

[fortran] spurious initialized warning with select-case?

2009-04-05 Thread Daniel Franke
Hi all. Here's another spurious(?) uninitialized warning. As the full range is implied, the question is, if this a fortran or a middle-end problem: $> cat range.f90 FUNCTION f(n) INTEGER, INTENT(in) :: n REAL:: f SELECT CASE (n) CASE ( :-1); f = -1.0 CASE (0);f

Re: [fortran] spurious initialized warning with select-case?

2009-04-05 Thread Daniel Franke
On Sunday 05 April 2009 18:56:20 Eric Botcazou wrote: > > I'm not sure if it would work and I have idea where in trans*.c > > you need to do this, but if you mark the tree as used with > > something like > > > > TREE_USED (__result_f) = 1 > > > > the middle-end may be silenced. > > I think that TRE

-f[no-]finite-math-only

2009-07-02 Thread Daniel Franke
Dear all, some Fortran77 code I inherited gives wrong results if compiled with '-ffast-math', especially with '-ffinite-math-only' enabled ('-ffast-math -fno-finite-math-only' seems to work). As '-ffinite-math-only' does "Allow optimizations for floating-point arithmetic that assume that argu