This is PR 78056.
- David
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> After a build of trunk this morning:
>
> f951: internal compiler error: in altivec_init_builtins, at
> config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17547
> 0x10da4df3 altivec_init_builtins
> ../../trunk/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000
Hi, JBG
Yes, this is a known problem with Kelvin's recent patch.
- David
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Building current GCC with current GCC (using config_list.mk) for
> --target=rs6000-ibm-aix5.3.0, I noticed a gcc_unreachable() during
> -fself-test,
>
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>
>> On 29 July 2016 at 16:25, Jeff Law wrote:
>> >> Well, if libiberty is going to be replaced en masse by gnulib, then
>> >> there's no sense in me cleaning up libiberty's regex.
>>
>> libiber
I believe that GCC only is used as a cross-compiler.
Thanks, David
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:39 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 12:24 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, David Malcolm
>> wrote:
>> > libcpp/charset.c
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:05 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> libcpp/charset.c has a helpful introductory comment describingcharacter
> sets, including the source and execution character sets.
>
> libcpp appears to attempt to support both UTF-8 and UTF-EBCDIC for the
> source character set, via:
>
> #i
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Jon Y as Cygwin and mingw-w64 maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Jon on his new role.
Jon, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Segher Boessenkool as rs6000/powerpc port co-maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Segher on his new role.
Segher, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 21/04/16 12:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 21 April 2016 at 12:11, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>>> the root cause is c++: c++ headers include random libc headers with
>>> _GNU_SOURCE ftm so all sorts of unexpected symbols are defined/declared.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Grigori Fursin wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> If it's of interest, we have released a new version of our open-source
> framework to share compiler optimization knowledge across diverse workloads
> and hardware. We would like to thank all the volunteers who ran this
>
Tobias and Maxim were the recent coordinators.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I may have missed this comment but GCC wouldn't need to apply as it's own
> GSoC project. The GNU Project applied as an umbrella organization and was
> accepted. Any GCC activities would be und
Hi, Jim
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 7:55 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> If I remove extendqihi2 (extend:HI pattern) from the PowerPC port,
>> will that cause any problems for the GCC RTL type system or inhibit
>> optimization
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed David Malcolm as libcpp and diagnostic messages maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating David on his new role.
David, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
csmith has uncovered a latent bug in the the PowerPC port for a
combiner pattern involving extendqihi2 (the alternative in the pattern
has never triggered for real code in over 10 years). Basic extendqihi2
works correctly (the instructions extend to entire register, but the
upper bits are ignored).
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:03 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> include/plugin-api.h defines an ABI between linker and compiler,
>>> which can be used to implement linker plug-in by any compilers.
>>> I'd like to add GCC Runtime Library Exception to includ
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Martin Jambor as HSA maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Martin on his new role.
Martin, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Patch committed to upstream libtool, thanks for your understanding.
Great!
How can I have the patch backported to GCC trunk and 5-branch libtool,
and then rebuild configure with the appropriate versions of autoconf?
I have not been able t
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 20/11/2015 14:14, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> Status
>>> ==
>>>
>>> We plan to do a GCC 5.3 release candidat
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Thanks David for reporting these problems.
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:31 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> (2) All of the graphite*.c files include ISL headers first. This
>> order is not supported by GCC development
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Sven Verdoolaege
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:14:47AM -0600, Sebastian Pop wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 9:31 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> > Sebastian,
Sebastian,
I have tried to build GCC with Graphite and ISL on AIX and encountered
two problems:
(1) isl/ctx.h
typedef enum {
isl_stat_error = -1,
isl_stat_ok = 0,
} isl_stat;
GCC complains about the comma in "isl_stat_ok = 0,". This seems like
a general bug that should appear o
On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> We plan to do a GCC 5.3 release candidate at the end of next week
> followed by the actual release a week after that.
>
> So now is the time to look at your regression bugs in bugzilla and
> do some backporting for thin
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Bernhard Schommer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if been working with the windriver Diab c compiler for 32bit ppc for and
> encountered an incompatibly with the eabi version of the gcc 4.83. When
> calling functions with more than 8 float arguments the gcc stores the 9th
> floa
Ajit,
As a start, look at the Inliner section of Honza's Status of
Interprocedural Optimizers presentation from Cauldron 2013.
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2013?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=Status_of_interprocedural_optimizers.pdf
- David
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Ajit Kumar Aga
https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/cpp/cpp0xmappings.html
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Bernhard Schommer
wrote:
> I just ran into something strange using gcc 8.4.3 for powerpc.
> A call to the __atomic_load function:
>
> __atomic_load(&Buf, &buf, __ATOMIC_SEQ_CST);
>
> expands to:
>
> sync
> lis
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:02 PM, wrote:
>
>> On Sep 9, 2015, at 1:54 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>>
>>> The ABI dictates basically everything you see. The call to
>>> explicit_bzero has for
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> The ABI dictates basically everything you see. The call to
> explicit_bzero has forced the compiler to *create* a second copy of
> the variable `k` on the stack, just so it can be erased -- and the
> copy in registers survives (at least for
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 01:54 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>> With the machinery for the git conversion now in reasonable shape, it's
>> time to ask GCC's developers in general: what do you want this
>> conversion to accomplish?
> There was some discu
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> trix = Tom Rix
> Not with Red Hat anymore. No idea where he is now.
Tom now works for Juniper Networks. A recent email address is:
trix = Tom Rix
- David
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On investigation of that list of usernames, I believe dje is the only
> ambiguous one.
All of my ChangeLog entries listed:
d...@watson.ibm.com
edels...@gnu.org
edels...@mhpcc.edu
edels...@npac.syr.edu
dje@gmail.com
and my name.
- David
be preferred to rol...@delasyd.gnu.ai.mit.edu.
>
> Corrected. I'll cheerfully accept any other corrections.
dje = David Edelsohn
edelsohn = David Edelsohn
These are both me. And I prefer dje@gmail.com, which is listed in
MAINTAINERS.
Thanks, David
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Kaz and I have been discussing the SH5/SH64 status, which is part of the SH
> port, every now and then. To our knowledge, there is no real hardware
> available as of today and we don't think there are any real users for a
> SH5/SH
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Andrey Semashev
wrote:
> On 14.08.2015 13:19, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>
>> On 14 August 2015 at 10:54, Andrey Semashev
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Otherwise I cannot see how (x==0 && y==0) could happen. The last load in
>>> each thread is sequenced after the first seq_cst st
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Nathan Sidwell as nvptx maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Nathan on his new role.
Nathan, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:47:53AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> This seems like a problem with the cost model. Rc instructions are
>> more expensive and should be represented as such in rtx_costs.
>
> The record i
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> The problem is that the following testcase on powerpc64le now
> generates worse code.
>
> void foo (signed char *p) { if (*p != 0) *p = 1; }
>
> before after
> foo:foo:
> lbz 9,0(3)
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/27/15 09:20, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:02 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> For the past couple days, gcc.gnu.org/sourceware.org is
>>> quite slow for me when accessing git and bugzilla. Am
>>> I the only one who has
Jakub,
I would like to backport this fixincludes patch to the GCC 4.8 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01975.html
Thanks, David
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:21PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> GCC 4.8 b
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:51:21PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> GCC 4.8 branch has degraded from 14 libstdc++ failures to 153. This
>
> On which target, when it has been reported, are the libstdc++ folks aware of
>
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:35 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 4.8.4-rc1 release candidate has been released.
> The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
> until the final release of GCC 4.8.4 which should happen roughly
> one week after the releas
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> It is time for another 4.8 release, I'd like to create 4.8.4 release
> candidate at the end of the next week and if all goes well, 4.8.4 release
> a week after that. If you have any safe fixes you'd like to be backported,
Because they have not shown general performance benefit.
I hope that the renewed attention and development effort will allow
them to be enabled by default eventually.
Thanks, David
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Is there any specific reason why none of the graphite loop
Kirill,
The patches have broken bootstrap on AIX and probably on other non-GNU
platforms. strchrnul() is a GNU extension.
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/lto-wrapper.c: In function 'unsigned int
parse_env_var(const char*, char***, const char*)':
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/lto-wrapper.c:427:35:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ==
>
> The trunk is scheduled to transition from Stage 1 to Stage 3 at the end
> of Saturday, November 15th (use your timezone to your advantage).
>
> We have been in Stage 1 for almost 7 months now with a fortnight
> still to go.
Hi, Jan
This probably is expected for AIX 4.3. I am surprised that this
occurs for AIX 5.3 because I thought that weak support was available
after AIX 5.1 or AIX 5.2.
I think that the weak support and MAKE_DECL_ONE_ONLY are required for
proper operation now.
Maybe I should formally deprecate AI
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>> I didn't see a place to post slides for Cauldron talks, so am posting
>> links to them here.
>
>
> I have added the links to
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2014#Slides_and_Notes
>
>
>> Does anyone know if any Ca
This failure now appears for powerpc-aix. I do not know if it happens
for ppc64-linux also.
Bootstrap currently is broken on AIX.
build/genmodes -h > tmp-modes.h
build/genmodes: config/rs6000/rs6000-modes.def:23: (TF) field format
must not be set
build/genmodes: machmode.def:203: (DF) field form
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Dear steering committee,
>
> To support the offloading features for Intel's Xeon Phi cards
> we need to add a foreign library (liboffload) into the gcc repository.
> README with build instructions is attached.
>
> I am also copy-pasti
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Bingfeng Mei wrote:
> As a short term solution, I tried some simple non-linear functions as Richard
> suggested
> to penalize using too many IVs. For example, the following cost in
> ivopts_global_cost_for_size fixed my regression and actually improves
> perform
It gives me great pleasure to announce that GCC has won the
ACM SIGPLAN Programming Languages Software Award
Congratulations to the entire GCC Community!
- David
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The 4.8 branch is now frozen as I am preparing a first release
> candidate for 4.8.3. All patches to the branch now require
> explicit approval from release managers.
Please hold off on GCC 4.8.3. powerpc-linux has a
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Richard Sandiford, Mike Stump and Ken Zadeck as Wide-Int Reviewers.
Please join me in congratulating Richard, Mike and Ken
on their new role. Please update your listings in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
happy to gain their experience and
knowledge.
The GCC Steering Commitee
David Edelsohn
Kaveh Ghazi
Jeffrey Law
Marc Lehmann
Jason Merrill
David Miller
Toon Moene
Joseph Myers
Gerald Pfeifer
Ramana Radhakrishnan
Joel Sherrill
Ian Lance Taylor
Jim Wilson
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Denis Chertykov wrote:
> 2014-03-03 15:35 GMT+04:00 David Brown :
>> On 02/03/14 19:24, Denis Chertykov wrote:
>>> I would remove two maintainers for AVR port:
>>> 1. Anatoly Sokolov
>>> 2. Eric Weddington
>>>
>>> I have discussed the removal with Anatoly Sokolov
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> [adding libstdc++@]
>
> Bill Schmidt writes:
>> It was recently pointed out to me that our new powerpc64le-linux-gnu
>> target does not yet have a corresponding directory in libstdc
>> ++-v3/config/abi/post/ to hold a baseline_symbols.t
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>> Maybe nobody bothers because using clang is easier than to fight with
>> FSF policies.
>
> Which is pretty close if not identical to my original point.
Your original point came across as a complaint that GCC does not
support plugins bec
new year!
The GCC Steering Commitee
David Edelsohn
Kaveh Ghazi
Jeffrey Law
Marc Lehmann
Jason Merrill
David Miller
Toon Moene
Joseph Myers
Gerald Pfeifer
Joel Sherrill
Jim Wilson
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Oleg Endo as co-maintainer of the SH port.
Please join me in congratulating Oleg on his new role.
Oleg, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> I suppose targets without .bss section support should not switch
>> (that is, targets not defining BSS_SECTION_ASM_OP or
>> ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGNED_BSS).
>
> Good point. I don't expect that we have many of those left, but
> if any do still
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> A make install from trunk 20131020 seems to be broken, at least when building
> with Go (last time I successfully installed was 20130917). However, even
> without Go enabled, dfa.c is rebuilt and and then the depending binaries are
> rebuil
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:31 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Some questions for the GCC steering committee:
>
> * is this JIT work a good thing? (I think so, obviously, but can I go
> ahead and e.g. add it to the wiki under "Current Projects"?)
>
> * do you like the general approach? I'm choosing t
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot
>> review the few, infrequent new port submissions. But I find it very
>> distasteful for someone to h
hem they look ARC
>>> specific so maybe the maintainership covers these as well.
>>>
>>> I suppose this automatism when being assigned the maintainership
>>> escaped Joern as well ... ;)
>>
>>
>> I knew that the maintainership in general covers
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2013, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
>> I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
>> (GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
>
> What about covering
I have established Google+ and Twitter pages for the GNU Toolchain
(GCC, Binutils, GDB) as additional, un-official communication channels
for announcements and highlights of interesting mailing list
discussions.
https://plus.google.com/108467477471815191158
https://twitter.com/gnutools
Anyone in
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
appointed Caroline Tice as VTV (libvtv) maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Caroline on her new role.
Please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
Happy hacking!
David
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 2013-08-26 12:51:53 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko
>> wrote:
>> > I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets
>> > that do not inclu
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Rodolfo Guilherme Wottrich
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to be able to generate multiple binaries from a single
> source file, each of which being slightly different from the other(s).
> For example, in case there's an OpenMP parallel region in the cod
The same error occurs on AIX because the tests are run without pthreads.
- David
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
> I spotted case ext/headers.cc failed on arm-none-eabi with below information:
>
> In file included from
> /home/build/work/gcc-build/arm-none-eabi/armv7-m/lib
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Altera Nios II port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Chung-Lin Tang and Sandra Loosemore as port maintainers. The initial patch
needs approval from a GCC GWP maintainer before it may be committed.
Please j
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Carrot Wei wrote:
> In insn patterns the register class is usually not directly used, instead
> different predicates and constraints are used. So can we use different
> predicates and constraints in memory access instructions and floating
> point arithmetic instru
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Andes nds32 port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Chung-Ju Wu and Shiva Chen as port maintainers. The initial patch
needs approval from a GCC GWP maintainer before it may be committed.
Please join me in co
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Carrot Wei wrote:
> Hi
>
> When I tried to build 444.namd with options "-O2 -m64 -mvsx
> -mcpu=power7", I can see vsx instructions are actually used, there are
> many xs- started instructions, but none of them use high registers
> [vsr32 -vsr63], does anybody know
GCC is hosted on platforms other than SVR4 ABI and ELF file format.
- David
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Dmitry Mikushin wrote:
> FWIW, we also needed to perform multiple invocations of toplev_main from
> a single execution of GCC frontend, which seems to be quite similar. The
> dirty dirty
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> The following patch disables lower-subreg for double double TFmode,
> bootstrap and regression tests are OK, but I'm a little unsure whether
> this is the right thing to do.
>
> * rs6000.c (TARGET_INIT_LOWER_SUBREG): Define.
> (
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Michael Witten wrote:
> That wiki information should be incorporated into what that wiki page
> calls `the official installation docs', and the rest of it should
> probably be thrown out as superfluous.
I agree that information about GCC is randomly spread betwee
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 10:38 AM, David Taylor wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:45:46AM -0400, David Taylor wrote:
>> > There are problems when using current STABS debug format for 64 bit
>> > targets.
>>
>> Why are you considering extending STABS at this point?
>> ST
Richi,
The GCC documentation for fp-contract is a little confusing and I'm
not sure what was intended. The last sentences says:
"-ffp-contract=on enables floating-point expression contraction if
allowed by the language standard. This is currently not implemented
and treated equal to -ffp-contrac
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:29 AM, Andris Pavenis wrote:
>> Forgot to say that I also had to apply this patch
>>
>> --- ../gcc-4.8.0/libbacktrace/alloc.c2013-01-14 19:17:30.0
>> +0100
>> +++ ../gcc-4.80/libbacktrace/alloc.c2013-03-24 18:07:11.995891959
>> +0100
>> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:28 AM, David Brown wrote:
> I use Freescale PPC devices with VLE, and I use Freescale's CodeWarrior
> to do so. At the start of the project, I looked at CodeSourcery's
> PPC-EABI tools (I have used CodeSourcery's gcc tools for other targets)
> - but without VLE support,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:58 AM, Will wrote:
> James Lemke codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> I have completed the binutils submission for VLE.
>> I am working on the gcc submission. The test results are looking good
>> now. Patches will be posted very soon.
>
> Do you have any update on the work o
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Jason Vas Dias
wrote:
> But why didn't the compiler complain that TLS was not supported ?
> Shouldn't it be doing so ? It is definitely not OK in my book for gcc
> to finish compilation and linkage with no errors or warnings, when
> it has encountered a __thread
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Jason Vas Dias
wrote:
> Hi - I wonder if anyone could please tell me if gcc's thread local
> storage support is meant to be enabled on AIX or not -
> I've built gcc-4.7.2 on AIX 6.1 OK, with "---enable-threads" ,
> using the AIX system /usr/ccs/bin ld and as , b
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 16:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> If no new P1 appears within a week,
>
> I may be about to file one. What priority would "Java doesn't compile on a
> secondary platform" count as? There's a trivial bug in libffi and I already
> p
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Joseph S. Myers
wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>> > GCC trunk remains in release branch mode, with only regression fixes
>> > and documentation changes allowed.
>>
>> is there a chance to get this committed to GCC 4.8 even if its a P4 bug
>
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Damian Rouson wrote:
> I'm interested in contributing to the gfortran compiler. Please send
> me any forms or instructions I need to follow regarding copyright
> assignment.
I sent the forms directly.
- David
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> Also note that for SPEC -funroll-loops helps GCC (yes ... we don't
> enable that by default at -O3, we probably should).
Richi,
Are you suggesting enabling -funroll-loops by default at -O3? When I
checked earlier this year, GCC was too a
I will inquire with the FSF Copyright Clerk.
- David
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Rainer Emrich
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Am 07.01.2013 08:44, schrieb Maxim Kuvyrkov:
>> On 4/01/2013, at 12:54 AM, Rainer Emrich wrote:
>>> I like to contribute
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Uday Khedker wrote:
> I would like to take this training program to the next level but so long
> it remains my personal baby, my funding agency does not feel that I have
> accomplished much because they feel that if my program has any merit,
> the GCC community w
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Uday Khedker wrote:
> I would like to take this training program to the next level but so long
> it remains my personal baby, my funding agency does not feel that I have
> accomplished much because they feel that if my program has any merit,
> the GCC community w
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Thomas Baier wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I've just subscribed to the list and I hope this is the right place for
> the following question.
>
> The operating system I'd like to use gcc for (OS-9, for the curious)
> requires an ABI, where global variables are only access
I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
accepted the Synopsys DesignWare ARC port for inclusion in GCC and appointed
Joern Rennecke as maintainer.
Please join me in congratulating Joern on his new role.
Joern, please update your listing in the MAINTAINERS file.
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
> We haven't done any work to support TLS in gnu as/ld on AIX (other
> than ignore these sections for now to avoid generating hard errors), so
> enabling TLS in GCC would indeed cause some troubles, although we don't
> use TLS directly in GNAT
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I was able to speak to Tristan, yesterday, and he confirmed that
> we haven't been able to contribute a few of the patches he wrote.
> Unfortunately, his TODO list is more than full, at the moment, and
> we don't think he'll have time to work
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> It does not look like the changes were merged into the FSF tree. This
>> also does not support some of the more recent AIX features added to
>> GCC.
>
> Tristan is usually pretty good at sending these sorts of patches.
> I will ask him on M
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:53 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> > Can you please clarify what "GNU ld is not completely usable" means?
>> > Is that referring to DWARF support? to compatibility with specific AIX
>> > releases? to compatibility with AIX DWARF feature?
>>
>> Sorry, I meant what "GNU ld is n
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>>> AIX still uses STABS. GCC produces it and GDB consumes it.
>>>
>>> Recent releases of AIX now support DWARF as well, but GCC and GDB have
>>&
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> AIX still uses STABS. GCC produces it and GDB consumes it.
>>
>> Recent releases of AIX now support DWARF as well, but GCC and GDB have
>> not been converted to use it on AIX.
>
> Note that GNU ld is now completely usable; and one of the s
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 03 Jan 2013, at 21:53, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
>> AIX still uses STABS. GCC produces it and GDB consumes it.
>
> More precisely, AIX uses Stabx. It's similar to Stabs, but different in quite
> a few ways.
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> "David" == David Taylor writes:
>
> David> It appears that STABS is largely in maintenance mode. Are there any
> David> plans to deprecate STABS support? If STABS enhancements were made and
> David> posted would they be frowned upon? Or
Future implementations of the IBM POWER architecture will include
hardware support for transaction memory. IBM is beginning to release
more information about the design and implementation. The
documentation of the POWER architecture transaction memory ISA has
been placed on the power.org website.
201 - 300 of 733 matches
Mail list logo
