Re: not-a-number's

2013-01-16 Thread David Paterson
-Original Message- From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Mischa Baars Sent: 16 January 2013 12:53 To: Robert Dewar; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: not-a-number's On 01/16/2013 01:28 PM, Robert Dewar wrote: On 1/16/2013 7:10 AM, Mischa Baars wrote:

RE: Heapless C/C++

2011-10-10 Thread David Paterson
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 11:13:31, Shiv Shankar Dayal wrote: Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Heapless C/C++ I have not thought over it for more than three days. But here is the simple answer. You can implement two stacks in one. Keep normal stuff which is not allocated by our alloca()

Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors

2011-01-13 Thread David Paterson
--- On Wed, 12/1/11, Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com wrote: From: Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com Subject: Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors To: David Paterson david.pater...@btinternet.com Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org gcc@gcc.gnu.org Date: Wednesday, 12

Re: Adding Leon processor to the SPARC list of processors

2011-01-12 Thread David Paterson
Hi all, I'm in the early stages of a Leon-based project, and have been trying to put together a cross toolchain for it. I'm having some problems getting it configured and working correctly, and this proposed option would very likely help me a lot. Is there any time scale for implementation,