Re: Broken check rejecting -fcf-protection and -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern

2020-04-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On 28 April 2020 17:14:49 BST, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 02:41:33PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> Its fine to focus on userspace first, but the kernel is far more >simple. >> >> Looking at that presentation, the only thing missing for kernel is >the >> notrack thunks, in

Re: Official GCC git repository

2008-03-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 12:47 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > We will never use git exclusively as long as it requires as many > workflow changes for people as it currently does. This is not me > speaking for the gcc community, this is me telling it like it is based > on experience moving us to svn.

Re: Official GCC git repository

2008-03-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 13:35 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote: > If by "really weird" you mean "nobody has any real complaints about > the way it works and are happy it is close to what they were using > before", then yes, they are using something "really weird". To be honest, I find it weird that Subver

Re: Official GCC git repository

2008-03-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 18:04 +, Andrew Haley wrote: > It's not possible for a VCS to be "different" -- it can only be > different from some other VCS. That's true. For a non-distributed VCS, the 'norm' is generally considered to be CVS. Subversion is "different from CVS", for a limited number

Re: Official GCC git repository

2008-04-19 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sat, 2008-04-19 at 11:34 -0400, NightStrike wrote: > On 4/19/08, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem with commits is that the average is not what matters. > > Commits are bursty. > > People make 5 commits to different branches in the course of a minute > > or two, then there

Re: Git repository with full GCC history

2007-06-01 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 10:39 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > How often will it be synced with upstream SVN? While you're at it, > would David mind to also place a binutils, glibc and glibc-ports GIT > repo next to it? That way, there would be a nice single point of GIT > repos for the whole tool

Re: [OT] Re: Git repository with full GCC history

2007-06-04 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2007-06-03 at 19:57 -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > If I can reproduce it I'll see if I can find some webspace. If you mail me a SSH public key you can also put it on git.infradead.org. -- dwmw2