Re: [Patch, Fortran] Add CO_BROADCAST

Le 29 sept. 2014 à 23:56, Dominique d'Humières domi...@lps.ens.fr a écrit : Unless there is an objection I plan to commit tomorrow the following patch with a change log: --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/coarray_collectives_9.f90 2014-09-25 12:14:05.0 +0200 +++ gcc

Re: [PING] [PATCH] Add direct support for Linux kernel __fentry__ patching

Le 27 sept. 2014 à 18:45, Dominique d'Humières domi...@lps.ens.fr a écrit : I think the patch for gcc.target/i386/nop-mcount.c should be --- ../_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/nop-mcount.c 2014-09-26 23:29:45.0 +0200 +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/nop-mcount.c

Re: [PATCH] remove duplicated lines in gcc/fortran/resolve.c

Le 21 sept. 2014 à 10:44, FX fxcoud...@gmail.com a écrit : AFAICT the lines 11200-11222 in gcc/fortran/resolve.c are a copy of the lines 11176-11198. The duplicates were introduced by revision 126468, an unrelated patch, after the original commit of the code as 126466. It looks like a

Re: [patch i386]: Sibcall tail-call improvement and partial fix PR/60104

Le 22 sept. 2014 à 20:50, Dominique d'Humières domi...@lps.ens.fr a écrit : So, I’m wondering if the x86 maintainers want me to review and approve a patch, or if they want to. I was assuming they wanted to. Mike, From the information available, I think the only acceptable patch

Re: fix gfcov regression

As said in PR63182, the attached patch fixes bootstrap without regression. Any reason why it has not yet been committed? Dominique Le 3 sept. 2014 à 15:15, Nathan Sidwell nat...@acm.org a écrit : On 09/03/14 04:06, Dominique Dhumieres wrote: I've committed the patch now. It (r214840)

Re: [GSoC] Elimination of CLooG library installation dependency

I see two regressions after r214069 on x86_64-apple-darwin13 for both -m32 and -m64: (1) FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/vect-pr43423.c scan-tree-dump-times vect vectorized 2 loops 1 before I saw [Book15] f90/bug% grep vectorized vect-pr43423.c.114t.vect

Re: PR 60414: Patch proposal

Le 21 juil. 2014 à 15:03, Andre Vehreschild ve...@gmx.de a écrit : Hi Dominique, thank you very much for your comments. I really appreciate them. ;-) Unfortunately I am contracted only for a limited number of around 6 bugs. The control on which bugs to pick is done by compiling a project

[PATCH, fortran-dev] Fix regexps

I’ll commit this afternoon the following patch to the fortran-dev branch unless someone objects. Dominique 2014-05-24 Dominique d'Humieres domi...@lps.ens.fr * gfortran.dg/assign_10.f90 * gfortran.dg/assumed_rank_12.f90: Likewise. * gfortran.dg/coarray_12.f90:

[PATCH] PR48094: ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto, backport to 4.8

Mike, In http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094#c21 you wrote Thanks for the report and the fix guys. I'd be fine with back port, if someone wants to develop and test it. The patch is identical to r202593 and has been tested on x86_64-apple-darwin13. Is it still OK? Dominique

Re: [PATCH] PR48094: ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto, backport to 4.7

The patch is r202593 adjusted for 4.7 and has been tested on x86_64-apple-darwin13. OK? Dominique ChangeLog CL_48094a Description: Binary data Patch patch-48094b Description: Binary data

Re: [committed, libjava] XFAIL sourcelocation (PR libgcj/55637) backported to 4.8.3

Thanks for the tip. What should I do now? Should I fix the ChangeLog entry and add a new one or do nothing? Dominique Le 2 avr. 2014 à 12:47, Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de a écrit : domi...@lps.ens.fr (Dominique Dhumieres) writes: r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de (Rainer Orth)

Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR60128 Wrong ouput using en edit descriptor

Updated gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90 to skip some tests not supported on i?86-*-solaris2.9* and hppa*-*-hpux* (these tests assume rounding to nearest and to even on tie, AFAICT i?86-*-solaris2.9* rounds real(16) to zero and hppa*-*-hpux* rounds all kinds to zero on tie, with some exceptions I don’t

[Patch, libgfortran] PR59771, PR59774, and PR59836 Bugs in FORMATs Fw.0, Gw.0, and Gw.d

The attached patch fixes these bugs and adds the tests. See the PRs for = the rationale of the changes. Regression tested on x86_64-apple-darwin13 and powerpc-apple-darwin9. OK for trunk, 4.8.3, and 4.7.4 (after testing)? Regards, Dominique CL Description: Binary data patch-59774t

Re: [Patch, libgfortran] PR59771, PR59774, and PR59836 Bugs in FORMATs Fw.0, Gw.0, and Gw.d

Yes OK, and I will commit for you. Thanks Jerry. While trying to back port the patch, I have found a leftover of my previous attempts: if (ft != FMT_F before == 0 w 0 d == 0 p == 0) should be if (ft != FMT_F w 0 d == 0 p == 0) The second change was needed for 4.7 (still one

[patch] Cleaning after the gfortran test suite

This patch extend the cleaning proposed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-10/msg00083.html to opened files. The patch is mostly obvious except for gfortran.dg/open_negative_unit_1.f90 for which I assumed that the second OPEN closes the file foo.txt without deleting it (and that it is the

<    1   2   3   4   5