Probably not on Linux indeed. But, since you modified the non-Linux path, you
need to avoid repeating the same mistake and test on non-Linux native too.
--
Eric Botcazou
thing to do.
> Tested with the appropriate runtest invocation on
> sparc-sun-solaris2.11. Ok for mainline?
Yes, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
> OK. Makes me wonder how many big endian LRA targets are getting significant
> use.
Debian still has an active SPARC64 port now based on GCC 7 with LRA.
--
Eric Botcazou
> I would like to commit the following comment about LEON3-FT errata now
> available in GCC-7.3.
Fine with me, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
, Richard B.
agreed to have it fixed on the 7 branch by reverting the problematic bits from
the PR rtl-optimization/59461 patch that introduced it.
Manually tested on mips64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied on the 7 branch.
2018-01-23 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR rtl-optimi
O starting from scratch is a bad idea.
> But writing a backend is too much for a GSoC, even a small one.
Definitely, and doing a CC0 conversion is probably an upper bound.
--
Eric Botcazou
ads (assuming some AVR processors are pipelined),
in which case CCmode will give you a performance bonus.
--
Eric Botcazou
2018-01-17 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc.dg/ipa/inlinehint-4.c: Also pass --param inline-unit-growth=20.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: gcc.dg/ipa/inlinehint-4.c
===
--- gcc.dg/ipa/inlinehint-4.c (revis
Hi,
as suggested by Jakub in the audit trail, this simply adjusts the dg-final
line according to whether it's for a logical_op_short_circuit target or not.
Tested on visium-elf and x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2018-01-17 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
P
> There should be just one warning per call, and (as it is) -Wrestrict
> should suppress -Wstringop-overflow. This suppression was a recent
> change (r256683).
Sorry, the changes indeed crossed, I'm going to revert mine.
--
Eric Botcazou
se, because
the offset of the field is then counted twice in refoff since it is already
comprised in const_off. In the end, the correct thing to do is just to equate
refoff and const_off.
Tested on visium-elf & x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2018-01-16 Eric Bo
so that this call to memcpy is preserved on
the other platforms too (by adding one character to the string) and adds the
additional dg-warning directive.
Tested on visium-elf & x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2018-01-16 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adac
On these platforms, one of the instances of the constructor generated in
test_strcpy_bounds_memarray_range is put into the constant pool so the strlen
pass cannot do its magic.
Tested on visium-elf, SPARC64 and x86-64/Linux, applied on the mainline.
2018-01-16 Eric Botcazou <ebo
On Visium, the compiler sometimes emits a NOP to avoid a pipeline hazard.
Tested on visium-elf and x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2018-01-16 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* c-c++-common/patchable_function_entry-decl.c: Use 3 NOPs on Visium.
* c-c++-
They either use too much space in the data segment or on the stack.
Tested on visium-elf, applied on the mainline.
2018-01-16 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ldist-27.c: Skip on Visium.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-interchange-1.c: Likewise.
*
Tested on visium-elf, applied on the mainline.
2018-01-16 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* config/visium/visium.md (nop): Tweak comment.
(hazard_nop): Likewise.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: config/visium/vis
We need to enable delayed-branch scheduling to have sibling calls on SPARC.
Tested on SPARC64/Linux, applied on the mainline and 7 branch.
2018-01-16 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR testsuite/77734
* gcc.dg/plugin/must-tail-call-1.c: Pass -fdelayed-branch on
The SPARC-V8 architecture contains a Y register so defines
a structure with a 'y' field on Linux.
Tested on SPARC64/Linux, applied on the mainline and 7 branch as obvious.
2018-01-16 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* testsuite/17_intro/names.cc: Undefine 'y' on SPARC
nner_type to determine the stack slot size
> when handling VIEW_CONVERT_EXPRs on strict-alignment targets.
This looks good to me, thanks for fixing the problem. Unexpectedly enough, I
don't see the failures on SPARC (32-bit or 64-bit).
--
Eric Botcazou
created gen_raw_REG.
>
> I'd like to ping this patch (for some reason it didn't make it into
> gcc-patches archive).
I apparently didn't get it either. The patch is OK, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
. There is a note in
the SCD about this quirk of setjmp so we must probably live with it.
Tested on SPARC64/Linux and SPARC/Solaris, applied on the mainline.
2018-01-12 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR target/83368
* config/sparc/sparc.h (PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM
on mainline and 7 branch.
2018-01-12 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR rtl-optimization/83565
* rtlanal.c (nonzero_bits1): On WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS machines, do
not extend the result to a larger mode for rotate operations.
(num_sign_bit_copies1): Li
on the mainline.
2018-01-10 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_component_type): Apply the check
for atomic access once the component size is taken into account and
also do it if the component type is Atomic or Volatile_Full_Access.
2
The -fdump-ada-spec currently generates invalid Ada for preprocessor macros
containing floating-point constants and string concatenations.
Tested on x86-64/Linux, applied on the mainline.
2018-01-10 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
c-family/
* c-ada-spec.c (dump_number
for excess errors)
-UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr43237.c scan-assembler-not LLST[^r\\\
\n]*DW_AT_upper_bound
Tested on SPARC/Solaris and x86-64/Linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2018-01-10 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_var_locatio
f-backed RTL framework.
--
Eric Botcazou
> This HOST_WIDE_INT is defined in gcc/hwint.h. Who is supposed to include
> this file? Is this done via an #include or via a tm_file (gcc/config.gcc)?
Nobody I'd say, the declaration shouldn't be compiled for the target.
--
Eric Botcazou
e git has specific counter-measures against them, but that's
useful at least with Subversion.
--
Eric Botcazou
This is a regression recently introduced on the mainline: the compiler doesn't
use the specified size to access an atomic variable with an address clause.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2017-12-21 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/
Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR C++/82872
* convert.c (convert_to_integer_1) : Do not return
the shared zero if the input has overflowed.
2017-12-21 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* c-c++-common/pr82872.c: New test.
--
Eric Botcazou/*
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2017-12-20 Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net>
Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
cp/
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression) : Remove
assertion on 2nd operand.
(potential_constant_expre
OK, let's go for IN_RANGE then, but it's Yoda style on steroids!
--
Eric Botcazou
as fast as reading
(x > a && x < b). And IN_RANGE is too ambiguous wrt the bounds.
--
Eric Botcazou
patch replaces the fix by a more robust variant. And I'm proposing that it be
installed on all active branches (the original fix is not on the 6 branch).
Tested on x86_64-w64-mingw32 (6 branch) and x86_64-suse-linux (mainline), OK?
2017-12-15 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2017-12-14 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/misc.c (default_pass_by_ref): Minor tweak.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: gcc-interface/misc.c
===
-
This clears DECL_DISREGARD_INLINE_LIMITS on recursive expression functions.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2017-12-14 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/trans.c (Call_to): Set DECL_DISREGARD_INLINE_LIMITS
to 0 on the
) and whose nominal
alignment is smaller than that of the former field.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline, 7 & 6 branches.
2017-12-14 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_field): Do not set the alignment
of the enclos
.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2017-12-14 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/gigi.h (pad_type_has_rm_size): Declare.
* gcc-interface/decl.c (gnat_to_gnu_entity) : Do notbuild
a padding type for the alignment before validating th
care much about that, so who am I to do it after all? ;-)
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux and SPARC/Solaris, applied on the mainline.
2017-12-13 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
Dominik Vogt <v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
PR middle-end/78468
* emit-rtl.
Ping for the last missing bits of the #pragma GCC unroll support:
> this is the (hopefully) final implementation of the support for the
> unrolling pragma in the C++ front-end.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-12/msg00298.html
Thanks in advance.
--
Eric Botcazou
This is another fixlet aimed at making gigi more robust in the presence of
unexpected nodes in the expanded code.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline and 7 branch.
2017-12-13 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/trans.c (Subprogram_Body_
on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline and 7 branch.
2017-12-13 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/trans.c (process_freeze_entity): Be prepared for a
package without body.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: gcc-interface/t
We treat System.Address as equivalent to void* for functions imported from C
and other languages, but the existing implementation was not very robust.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline and 7 branch.
2017-12-13 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-int
> The old code was inconsistent, had return false; in one case and assert in
> the remaining two spots. If you are not against it, I'd use return false;
> in both cases if we want consistency.
Sure, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
d an assertion
on the same PARALLEL in the second one.
No big deal in either case so your call for the definitive version.
--
Eric Botcazou
on, it seems to duplicate everything in the 2 main arms.
--
Eric Botcazou
|| GET_CODE (xxx) == USE)
Couldn't the code be also re-factored? Because 3x the same change is a lot...
> 2017-12-06 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> * recog.c (store_data_bypass_p): Handle USE in a PARALLEL
> like CLOBBER. Formatting fixes.
OK for mainline modulo the above remark.
--
Eric Botcazou
> 2017-12-11 Daniel Cederman <ceder...@gaisler.com>
>
> * config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_do_work_around_errata): Make sure
> the jump is to a label.
OK for mainline and 7 branch, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
> 6.1 Extensions implemented in GNU Fortran
> 7.2 GNU Fortran Compiler Directives
>
> 6.1 describes extension covering legacy code and vendor extensions.
> 7.2 describes other !$GCC directives. Currently, the section is
> mainly calling conventions (CDECL, STDCALL, etc) and library
> macroc
?
2017-12-06 Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net>
Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
cp/
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression) : Remove
assertion on 2nd operand.
(potential_constant_expression_1): Likewise.
* cp-tree.h (cp_convert_range_
here with write access, danielh, is currently traveling, so
> we wont be able to revert it until next week. If it is urgent, could I
> ask you to revert it for us?
It's not that urgent of course but I've reverted it.
--
Eric Botcazou
e change I already rejected back in July?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00496.html
If so, what has changed since then? If nothing, then please revert.
--
Eric Botcazou
> No, there was no particular reason. mem_ref seems like a better choice
> if it detects more types of loads.
Right, it's supposed to detect all types of loads. Here's what I have
installed on the mainline and 7 branch.
2017-12-04 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
> Since there are no comments, I'll commit it now.
The idea looks interesting but the timing is a bit more questionable.
--
Eric Botcazou
MEM_P instead of mem_ref here? It looks like
there is also a case for the b2bst workaround (only loads are concerned).
If no, I'll make the changes along with more cosmetic fixes.
--
Eric Botcazou
> 2017-11-30 Tristan Gingold <ging...@adacore.com>
>
> * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_do_cfi_startproc): Only emit
> .cfi_personality or .cfi_lsda if the eh data format is dwarf2.
PR ada/81470 must be put on the first line to trigger xref in Bugzilla.
--
Eric Botcazou
a for
> GR712RC.
> (pass_work_around_errata::gate): Also test sparc_fix_gr712rc.
> * config/sparc/sparc.md (fix_gr712rc): New attribute.
> (in_branch_annul_delay): Prevent floating-point instructions
> in delay slot of annulled integer branch.
OK for mainline and 7 branch, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
> 2017-11-27 Daniel Cederman <ceder...@gaisler.com>
>
> * config/sparc/sparc.c (sparc_do_work_around_errata): Treat the
> movsi_pic_gotdata_op instruction as a load for the UT699 errata
> workaround.
OK for mainline, 7 and 6 branches, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
> 2017-11-27 Martin Aberg <mab...@gaisler.com>
>
> * config/sparc/sparc.md (divdf3_fix): Add NOP and adjust length
> to prevent b2bst errata sequence.
> (sqrtdf2_fix): Likewise.
OK for mainline and 7 branch, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
delay
> attribute.
Let's not though and make the modification I suggested instead.
--
Eric Botcazou
*/
> + if (i == 2)
> + emit_insn_before (gen_nop (), next);
> + insert_nop = true;
> + break;
> + }
Superfluous "is".
--
Eric Botcazou
* config/sparc/sync.md (atomic_compare_and_swap_leon3_1): Make
> instruction referable in atomic_insns_p.
OK for mainline and 7 branch, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
> 2017-11-17 Daniel Cederman <ceder...@gaisler.com>
>
> * config/sparc/sync.md (swapsi): 16-byte align if sparc_fix_gr712rc.
> (atomic_compare_and_swap_leon3_1): Likewise.
> (ldstub): Likewise.
OK for mainline and 7 branch, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
quot;)
> + ] (const_string "false")))
> +
> (define_delay (eq_attr "type" "call")
>[(eq_attr "in_call_delay" "true") (nil) (nil)])
is barely maintainable. So let's go back to the original version and...
> @@ -602,6 +626,10 @@
&g
ps and
#pragma GCC N wins over --param max-unroll-times=M.
--
Eric Botcazou
ted on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
> Pragma support in the FEs need FE maintainer approval.
Yes, I have posted separate patches for the C/C++ and Fortran front-ends.
2017-11-27 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* cfgloop.h (struct loop): Document usage
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <al...@gcc.gnu.org>
Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
fortran/ChangeLog:
* array.c (gfc_copy_iterator): Copy unroll field.
* decl.c (directive_unroll): New global variable.
(gfc_match_gcc_unroll): New function.
-11-25 Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net>
Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
ChangeLog/
* doc/extend.texi (Loop-Specific Pragmas): Document pragma GCC unroll.
c-family/ChangeLog:
* c-pragma.c (init_pragma): Register pragma GCC unroll.
* c-pr
pt b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.opt
> index 22267f5..43cd964 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.opt
> +++ b/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.opt
> @@ -253,6 +253,10 @@ Enable workarounds for the errata of the GR712RC
> processor. TargetVariable
> unsigned int sparc_fix_b2bst
>
> +;; Enable workaround for TN-0013 errata
> +TargetVariable
> +unsigned int sparc_fix_tn0013
Can we find a more evocative name for the variable?
--
Eric Botcazou
target = next_active_insn (JUMP_LABEL_AS_INSN (jump));
rtx_insn *target
= next_active_insn (JUMP_LABEL_AS_INSN (jump));
> + if (target
> + && atomic_insn_p (target))
On a single line.
--
Eric Botcazou
ngly (and conservatively),
see atomic_compare_and_swapdi_v8plus for reference.
--
Eric Botcazou
@
> (define_delay (eq_attr "type" "branch")
>[(eq_attr "in_branch_delay" "true") (nil) (eq_attr "in_branch_delay"
> "true")])
>
> +(define_delay (and (eq_attr "type" "branch") (eq_attr "branch_type" "icc"))
> + [(eq_attr "in_branch_delay" "true") (nil)
> + (eq_attr "in_branch_annul_delay" "true")])
> +
I think that we'd better keep the various define_delay's mutually exclusive.
--
Eric Botcazou
6_BUILTIN__BDESC_SPECIAL_ARGS2_LAST)
^
/home/eric/gnat/gnat-head/src/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:37443:48: error:
‘bdesc_special_args2’ was not declared in this scope
return ix86_expand_special_args_builtin (bdesc_special_args2 + i, exp,
--
Eric Botcazou
This fixes a small oversight in gigi, which can lead to an inconsistency
between type variants for the mode when packed array types are involved.
Tested on x86-64/Linux, applied on the mainline.
2017-11-23 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR ada/83091
* gcc-int
that CROSSING_JUMP_P is not documented at all (instead the now
dead REG_CROSSING_JUMP still is) so the patch does a bit of housekeeping work.
Tested on x86-64/Linux and SPARC64/Linux, applied on the mainline.
2017-11-22 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR rtl-optimization
net>
Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <al...@gcc.gnu.org>
ChangeLog/
* doc/extend.texi (Loop-Specific Pragmas): Document pragma GCC unroll.
* doc/generic.texi (ANNOTATE_EXPR): Document 3rd operand.
* cfgloop.h
> If we don't then i would say that's the bug to fix, not warp back in
> time 20 years. Why let solaris hold hostage everybody else?
Let's not start a flame war, please. Almost all other uses of grep in the
libgo directory have >/dev/null instead of -q and nobody chokes on them.
> Unfortunately this patch broke i686-linux bootstrap, during stage2
> libgcc configure fails due to numerous ICEs.
Note that the patch is on the 7 branch too.
--
Eric Botcazou
> grep -q was even required by SUSv2 from 1997 so Solaris should really
> support it. What version if Solaris is that and what version of grep?
/usr/bin/grep on Solaris 10 (/usr/xpg4/bin/grep does support it).
--
Eric Botcazou
> This patch by Than McIntosh fixes a small bug in the libgo Makefile
> recipe that constructs the directory from which to pick up
> libgcc_s.so; the gccgo invocation with -print-libgcc-file-name was
> missing the flags, which meant that for -m32 builds we'd see the
> 64-bit libgcc dir.
(var_decl) = 1;
It's for Darwin - you need to evaluate your patch on Darwin.
> I don't understand how this works - if there is no bss support in the
> linker, wouldn't common variables would still end up in the data section?
There is, it's essentially a syntactic issue in the assembler IIRC.
--
Eric Botcazou
er might do more than
> intended, see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg01468.html
> I expect updates to the C and C++ in this area to be reflected to Fortran
> too.
Yes, it's a generic issue.
--
Eric Botcazou
do} loop or a @samp{#pragma ivdep}, and applies
> only to the loop that follows. @var{n} is an integer constant
> expression; a value of 0 or 1 disables unrolling of the loop.
Thanks, integrated into the patch.
--
Eric Botcazou
y the flag as well.
The other optimization hints (ivdep, [no-]vector) aren't copied either.
> I think this has the same issue as the RTL unroller change.
Right.
--
Eric Botcazou
> If anybody finds the time to push the corresponding Fortran changes then I'd
> be grateful. I won't have time for this until end of stage 1...
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-02/msg00014.html
OK, I'm going to merge it in the main patch.
--
Eric Botcazou
> It was a typo in the conditional (I cleaned it up just before comitting
> because I noticed I can merge it with earlier conditional and accidentally
> dropped !). It should be fixed now.
OK, thanks, unfortunately the bug made it into the latest source snapshot.
--
Eric Botcazou
> Is this still needed? I know Martin L did another teak for non-executed
> blocks in Ada... BUt I don't know enough to determine if it was
> sufficient to address this problem.
Yes, Martin's patch fixed the regression in Ada so mine is obsolete.
--
Eric Botcazou
> I believe this caused hundreds of new FAILs on both x86_64 and i686-linux.
> Seems after this change we no longer inline always_inline functions into
> -O0 callers, which is wrong.
That's worse than this, inlining is totally broken...
--
Eric Botcazou
This gets rid of the warning about the unrecognized option -nostdinc++ passed
to gnat1 during the build of the gnattools.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2017-11-20 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR ada/83016
* gnatlink.adb (Process_Args):
guards all over the place, polishing a few rough edges and
eliminating a few preexisting nits in the unrolling code.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2017-11-17 Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net>
Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
ChangeLog:
> Following patch survives regression tests and bootstraps.
Please drop the Ada bits though, -Wreturn-type just doesn't work in Ada.
--
Eric Botcazou
in tree-cfg.c. That change is preapproved if it works, and your
> patch if you want in addition to that is ok too.
That's the first thing I tried and it indeed works.
--
Eric Botcazou
killed any hope of preserving
padding a long time ago for not-so-legal programs anyway).
--
Eric Botcazou
> 2017-11-10 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
>
> PR lto/81351
> * debug.h (dwarf2out_do_eh_frame): Declare.
> * dwarf2cfi.c (dwarf2out_do_eh_frame): New predicate.
> (dwarf2out_do_frame): Use it.
> (dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm): Like
in any mode unless -fcheck-new is provided.
Incorrect entry, it should go in gcc/cp/ChangeLog without the cp/ prefix:
* init.c (build_new_1): Don't do a null check for
a namespace-scope non-replaceable placement new
in any mode unless -fcheck-new is provided.
--
Eric Botcazou
for mainline?
2017-11-10 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
PR lto/81351
* debug.h (dwarf2out_do_eh_frame): Declare.
* dwarf2cfi.c (dwarf2out_do_eh_frame): New predicate.
(dwarf2out_do_frame): Use it.
(dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm): Likewise.
* dwarf
on the mainline, 7 and 6 branches.
2017-11-10 Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
* gcc-interface/utils.c (convert) : Add comment and do
not fall through to the next case.
: Deal specially with a dereference from another array
type with the same elemen
c (try_merge_compare): Punt if def_insn is not
> single set.
>
> * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr82913.c: New test.
OK, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
is is all masked on x86 because -funwind-tables is always enabled). On the
other hand, this is required for a normal link too.
I guess that would be more consistent with what happens with -fdwarf2-cfi-asm.
--
Eric Botcazou
> this is PR lto/81351.
Totally missed it... Do not hesitate to CC me for SPARC regressions.
--
Eric Botcazou
1201 - 1300 of 5473 matches
Mail list logo
