So it seems like we agreed that this is a problem that should be fixed.
Shall I create a bug report suggesting for it?
Am Friday, 12. August 2011, 09:32:11 schrieb Richard Guenther:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Joseph S. Myers
> >
> >
Am Thursday, 11. August 2011, 19:15:41 schrieb Richard Guenther:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 09:05:19AM -0700, Florian Merz wrote:
> >> If I remember the standard correctly, pointer subtraction is valid if
> >> both po
Thanks for your reply Richard, but I'm not satisfied with your answer, yet. :-)
If I'm right, then the problem I'm refering to doesn't require large objects.
See below for more.
Am Thursday, 11. August 2011, 17:48:26 schrieb Richard Guenther:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 a
Dear gcc developers,
this is about an issue that popped up in a verification project [1] based on
LLVM, but it seems to be already present in the gimple code, before llvm-gcc
transforms the gimple code to LLVM-IR.
In short:
Calculating the difference of two pointers seems to be treated by gcc a
