Hi Francois, Colm,

I've read your emails and I'd like to be involved in this project.

As you can read in my past emails in the GCC ML, I've tried two years ago to 
create a porting of GCC to PIC 18FXXX.

The project was developed when I was student without a truly and strong guide 
in all involved activities.
My proposal is: I could share the code I've developed but, keep in mind, that 
the code should contain some error.

Starting from it, we could continue / modify / correct / improve the porting 
all together. What do you think about it ? 

Ciao! 
Gabriele.




 

-----Original Message-----
From: Franзois Poulain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 7:56 PM
To: Colm O' Flaherty
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GCC Port (gcc backend) for Microchip PICMicro microcontroller

> Like you, I'm still studying the internals of gcc, but I'm close to 
> being confident enough to start making some changes.

Nice !

Le lundi 06 mars 2006 а 17:17 +0000, Colm O' Flaherty a йcrit :
> Francois,
> 
> There are only 35 instructions in the 14 bit instruction set, and 
> given that, in gcc, the main initial work seems to be in describing 
> the targets instruction set, it might not take much to find out what 
> implementation issues will occur, by just taking to the time to describe the 
> instructions.
> For me, the things that I suspect to be issues are:
> 
> -8 bit ALU
> -small memory space
> -limited stack space (8 levels on 16F) -the number of PIC devices
> (configurations) that would need to be supported (with the various 
> number of banks, and memory configs)
> 
> Like you, I'm still studying the internals of gcc, but I'm close to 
> being confident enough to start making some changes.
> 
> Colm

Reply via email to