RE: [GOMP4] SIMD enabled function for C/C++

2013-11-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 1:16 PM To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' Subject: [GOMP4] SIMD enabled function for C/C++ Hello Jakub, I was looking at my elemental function for C patch that I fixed up

RE: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 1:15 PM To: al...@redhat.com Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C HI Aldy and Jakub

RE: [GOMP4][PATCH] SIMD-enabled functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C++

2013-11-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
the C/C++ common tests for SIMD enabled function. * g++.dg/cilk-plus/ef_test.C: New test. Is this OK for branch? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:19 PM To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al

RE: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-28 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:11 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Jeff Law Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ On 11/27/2013 11:05 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Found the bug. I

RE: PATCH: PR c/59309: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g -fcilkplus (test for excess errors)

2013-11-28 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Lu, Hongjiu Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:06 AM To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Iyer, Balaji V Subject: PATCH: PR c/59309: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk- plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g -fcilkplus (test for excess errors) Hi, For function without

RE: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-28 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 9:11 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Jeff Law Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ On 11/27/2013 11:05 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Found the bug. I

RE: [testsuite] Properly set ld_library_path in cilk-plus tests

2013-11-27 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 6:39 AM To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Iyer, Balaji V Subject: [testsuite] Properly set ld_library_path in cilk-plus tests All 64-bit gcc.dg/atomic and c-c++-common

RE: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-27 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
: Added calls for the above tests. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 10:52 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled

RE: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-27 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 12:43 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Jeff Law Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ On 11/25/2013 10:50 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: I have fixed

RE: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++

2013-11-27 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 2:43 PM To: Jason Merrill; Iyer, Balaji V; Aldy Hernandez Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; r...@redhat.com; Jakub Jelinek Subject: Re: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++ On 11/27/13 10:06

RE: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-27 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:24 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Jeff Law Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ On 11/27/2013 05:59 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Well, if I use

RE: gcc's obvious patch policy

2013-11-26 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:31 AM To: Diego Novillo; Steven Bosscher; gcc-patches Subject: Re: gcc's obvious patch policy On 11/26/13 08:21, Diego Novillo

[PING]RE: [PATCH] _Cilk_for for C and C++

2013-11-26 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hi Jeff et al., Did you get a chance to look at my _Cilk_for patch for C? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 4:51 PM To: Aldy Hernandez Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Jeff Law; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); r

RE: gcc's obvious patch policy

2013-11-26 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Eric Botcazou [mailto:ebotca...@adacore.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 12:33 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Diego Novillo; Jeff Law; Steven Bosscher Subject: Re: gcc's obvious patch policy Can I make a suggestion

[PING]: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-26 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hi Jakub, Did you get a chance to look at this patch? Is it Ok to install? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 5:09 PM To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Joseph S. Myers; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Aldy Hernandez (al

RE: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-25 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hi Jason, Please see my responses below -Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 10:51 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Jeff Law Subject: Re: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ On 11/21/2013 05:40 PM

RE: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-21 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hi Jason, Please see my responses below. I have also attached a fixed patch and the Changelog entries are cut and pasted below. -Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 1:59 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches

[GOMP4][PATCH] SIMD-enabled functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C++

2013-11-20 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, Attached, please find a patch that will implement SIMD-enabled functions for C++ targeting the gomp-4_0-branch. Here are the Changelog entries. Is this OK to install? gcc/cp/ChangeLog 2013-11-20 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com * parser.c

[PING]: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-20 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
approved. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 10:19 PM To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); Jeff Law Subject: _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ Hello Jason et al., Mike Stump mentioned

RE: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Also, I'm not sure I like doing the transformation from Cilk+ to OpenMP syntax through rewriting tokens, rather than at the parsing level. After all, the Cilk+ syntax is quite different, even when the patch pretends it is the same, consider e.g. the linear clause, which in Cilk+ allows to

RE: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:31 AM To: Joseph S. Myers Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff Law Subject: Re: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly

RE: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:00 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Joseph S. Myers; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff Law Subject: Re: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly

RE: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 12:00 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Joseph S. Myers; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jeff Law Subject: Re: [GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly

[GOMP4] [PATCH] SIMD-Enabled Functions (formerly Elemental functions) for C

2013-11-18 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, Attached, please find a patch that will implement SIMD enabled functions for C targeting the gomp-4_0-branch. Here are the ChangeLog entries. Is this OK to install? gcc/c/ChangeLog 2013-11-18 Balaji V. Iyer balaji.v.i...@intel.com * c-parser.c

_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++

2013-11-17 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Jason et al., Mike Stump mentioned that my _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ may have been lost in the email pile. So, attached is an updated _Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync for C++ patch. Is this Ok to install? Here are the ChangeLog entries (they shouldn't have changed since the

RE: PING: Fwd: Re: [patch] implement Cilk Plus simd loops on trunk

2013-11-15 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 2:38 AM To: Aldy Hernandez Cc: Jason Merrill; gcc-patches; Iyer, Balaji V Subject: Re: PING: Fwd: Re: [patch] implement Cilk Plus simd loops on trunk On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:29

RE: PING: Fwd: Re: [patch] implement Cilk Plus simd loops on trunk

2013-11-15 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:39 PM To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Jason Merrill; gcc-patches; Iyer, Balaji V Subject: Re: PING: Fwd: Re: [patch] implement Cilk Plus simd loops on trunk On 11/14/13 10:05, Jakub

RE: cilking away

2013-11-15 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Mike Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 7:41 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Patches Subject: cilking away Kenny reported that the library name is mixed into the test case name. This is wrong

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951

2013-11-12 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:30 AM To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Jeff Law; GCC Patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951 On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951

2013-11-11 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 6:52 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951 Hi Balaji, any chance to get this fixed? Bootstrap on FreeBSD has now

RE: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets

2013-11-11 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: David Edelsohn [mailto:dje@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 11:36 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: GCC Patches; Joseph S. Myers Subject: Re: PING Cilk Plus failures on non-LTO targets On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:06 AM, David Edelsohn dje

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951

2013-11-11 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 11:40 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Gerald Pfeifer Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951 On 11/11

Question about overloaded operators

2013-11-10 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, In C++, when a binary/unary operator is overloaded, then the build_x_[binary/unary]_op replaces it with a call expression. Is there a way to know from the call expression (assume we are in the gimplification stage) what the operator is? I tried to look around but I

RE: Question about overloaded operators

2013-11-10 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 1:55 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Question about overloaded operators On 11/10/2013 11:08 AM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: In C++, when a binary/unary operator

Fix for PR 59039

2013-11-08 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, Attached, please find a patch that will fix a crash in a function in libcilkrts when optimization was turned on. The issue was that the longjump and setjmp were called in the same function. This patch should fix that issue. The change is not in the compiler side but

RE: [PATCH] Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-11-08 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Iain Sandoe [mailto:i...@codesourcery.com] Sent: Friday, November 8, 2013 3:28 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer; Jakub Jelinek; Joseph S. Myers; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches; Mike Stump Subject: Re: [PATCH] Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include

RE: Bootstrap issues in libsanitizer

2013-11-06 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 5:55 AM To: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; konstantin.s.serebry...@gmail.com; Jonathan Wakely Subject: Re: Bootstrap issues in libsanitizer

RE: [PATCH] RE: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build

2013-11-05 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 7:08 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Tom de Vries; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Iyer, Balaji V

Bootstrap issues in libsanitizer

2013-11-05 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, I am getting this weird bootstrap error in my SUSE machine with libsanitizer that didn't occur ~1.5 days ago. Is anyone else seeing this? libtool: compile: /export/users/gcc-svn/b-trunk-gcc/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/export/users/gcc-svn/b-trunk-gcc/./gcc -nostdinc++

RE: PR 58958: wrong aliasing info

2013-11-05 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:02 AM To: Marc Glisse; Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Richard Biener; GCC Patches Subject: Re: PR 58958: wrong aliasing info On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:40:02AM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote: Well

[PATCH] RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-11-05 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Iain Sandoe; Joseph S. Myers; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:21:04PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: Tests that many seconds or more on fast

RE: [PATCH] RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-11-05 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
, November 5, 2013 12:21 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Iain Sandoe; Joseph S. Myers; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:04:21PM +, Iyer, Balaji V wrote

RE: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build

2013-11-04 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hi Tom, Please see my response below: Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Tom de Vries [mailto:tom_devr...@mentor.com] Sent: Monday, November 4, 2013 2:15 PM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Iyer, Balaji V Subject: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build Hi, When

RE: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build

2013-11-04 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
. -Original Message- From: Tom de Vries [mailto:tom_devr...@mentor.com] Sent: Monday, November 4, 2013 2:15 PM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Iyer, Balaji V Subject: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build Hi, When configuring a gcc build with --disable-bootstrap --enable- languages=c I run

[PATCH] RE: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build

2013-11-04 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Tom de Vries [mailto:tom_devr...@mentor.com] Sent: Monday, November 4, 2013 2:15 PM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Iyer, Balaji V Subject: libcilkrts breaks non-bootstrap build Hi, When configuring a gcc build with --disable-bootstrap --enable- languages=c

RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-11-04 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hi Iain, I have prefixed all my replies below with BVI: Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. From: Iain Sandoe [mailto:i...@codesourcery.com] Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2013 11:01 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Joseph S. Myers; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library

[PATCH] Fix for PR bootstrap/58951

2013-11-04 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, Attached, please find a patch to fix PR 58951. The usage of -ldl is not necessary. The patch is tested in x86_64 and x86. It is committed as obvious. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. Index: Makefile.in === ---

[PATCH] Added the libcilkrts path to linker

2013-11-01 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, This patch will pass in -Llibcilkrts_path to all the Cilk keywords testsuite files. This patch should Pass all the Cilk keywords tests failing in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-11/msg00083.html. Tested no x86_64 SUSE machine (-m32 and -m64 mode) It is

RE: [PATCH] RE: libcilkrts/runtime/config/generic/cilk-abi-vla.c failure (was: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check for availability of alloca.h (Bug Bootstrap/58918))

2013-10-31 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 3:46 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Gerald Pfeifer; Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RE: libcilkrts/runtime/config/generic/cilk-abi-vla.c failure (was: [PATCH, committed

Question about a fix for PR 58925

2013-10-31 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, I am currently looking to fix the bug reported in PR 58925. Here is the issue, When the user configures using the following command: ../gcc/configure --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --disable-bootstrap --disable-werror --disable-multilib --enable-languages=c,c++

RE: Question about a fix for PR 58925

2013-10-31 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Andrew MacLeod [mailto:amacl...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:44 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'; Jeff Law Subject: Re: Question about a fix for PR 58925 on a related note, is there something I have to do to make

RE: Question about a fix for PR 58925

2013-10-31 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Andrew MacLeod [mailto:amacl...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:14 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'; Jeff Law Subject: Re: Question about a fix for PR 58925 On 10/31/2013 12:05 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: -Original

RE: [PATCH] RE: libcilkrts/runtime/config/generic/cilk-abi-vla.c failure

2013-10-31 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hi Rainer, This patch looks OK. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Orth Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 10:02 AM To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Gerald Pfeifer; Jeff Law; gcc

[PATCH] Fix for PR 58925

2013-10-31 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 11:36 AM To: 'g...@gcc.gnu.org' Cc: Jeff Law Subject: Question about a fix for PR 58925 Hello Everyone, I am currently looking to fix the bug reported in PR 58925. Here is the issue, When the user

RE: libcilkrts portability

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:04 PM To: Gerald Pfeifer; Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libcilkrts portability On 10/29/13 16:56, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: Hi Balaji, On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Iyer, Balaji

[PATCH] RE: libcilkrts/runtime/config/generic/cilk-abi-vla.c failure (was: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check for availability of alloca.h (Bug Bootstrap/58918))

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Gerald Pfeifer [mailto:ger...@pfeifer.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 9:39 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: libcilkrts/runtime/config/generic/cilk-abi-vla.c failure (was: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check

RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
doesn't have to do anything to figure it out.). Can someone please tell me how do I do this? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Tobias Burnus [mailto:bur...@net-b.de] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:35 AM To: gcc patches; Iyer, Balaji V Subject: Testsuite / Cilk Plus

RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:08 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp On 10/30/13 09:09, Iyer

RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 1:15 PM To: Jeff Law Cc: Iyer, Balaji V; Tobias Burnus; gcc patches Subject: Re: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

RE: Testsuite / Cilk Plus: Include library path in compile flags in gcc.dg/cilk-plus/cilk-plus.exp

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
* * * Actually, I was wondering whether -fcilkplus should always automatically link libcilkrts - akin to -fopenmp which links libgomp. Currently, one has to specify it manually.* Yes, I would like that to happen. Do you have any pointers about how to do that?

[PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check for availability of alloca.h (Bug Bootstrap/58918)

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, This attached patch will check for usage of alloca.h before using it. The change is entirely in libcilkrts and I am committing this change as it is pretty obvious (the change was lifted from the autconf manual example). Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. Index:

RE: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check for availability of alloca.h (Bug Bootstrap/58918)

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Err... I meant to say ...*availability* of alloca.h before using it... -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:41 PM To: 'ger...@pfeifer.com' Cc: Jeff Law; 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' Subject: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check

RE: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check for availability of alloca.h (Bug Bootstrap/58918)

2013-10-30 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Mike Stump [mailto:mikest...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 6:48 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: 'ger...@pfeifer.com'; Jeff Law; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH, committed] libcilkrts - Add check for availability of alloca.h (Bug

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-10-28 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Law Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 4:24 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com) Cc: gcc-patches

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-24 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
=sharing). Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 4:33 PM To: Joseph S. Myers; Iyer, Balaji V Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com) Subject

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-24 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
: Thursday, October 24, 2013 12:15 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); Joseph S. Myers Subject: Re: Cilk Library On 10/23/2013 12:30 PM, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Hi Jeff et al., Here is a link to the updated

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:15 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: Cilk Library On 10/16/13 13:30, Iyer

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
double-checked (using nm) that all symbols are hidden unless we have explicitly allowed them to be public. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 1:15 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Aldy Hernandez

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-10-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Can you take a look at calls.c::special_function_p and determine if we need to do something special for spawn here? I will look into it and let you know. Any word on this? Hi Jeff, I looked into this function and from what I can tell, it is used to mark certain functions

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-10-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 3:53 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com) Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-10-18 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
: Thursday, October 17, 2013 5:30 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com) Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++) On 09/11/13 12:18, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Hello

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-16 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Jeff, Please see my comments below: Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 4:14 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); r...@redhat.com; Jason

RE: PING: Fwd: Re: [patch] implement Cilk Plus simd loops on trunk

2013-10-16 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches- ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Aldy Hernandez Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 1:49 PM To: Jason Merrill Cc: Richard Henderson; gcc-patches; Iyer, Balaji V Subject: Re: PING: Fwd: Re: [patch] implement

[PING][PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-10-14 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, I submitted this patch ~1 months ago. Did anyone get a chance to look into this patch? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 2:18 PM To: r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); Jeff

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-10 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 9:19 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Jeff Law; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: Cilk Library On 10/09/13 13:32, Iyer, Balaji V wrote

RE: Cilk Library

2013-10-09 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 3:45 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com); r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: Cilk Library On 10/02/13 13:40, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: Dear steering committee, To support the _Cilk_spawn

Cilk Library

2013-10-02 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Dear steering committee, To support the _Cilk_spawn, and _Cilk_sync implementation in GCC (patch submitted link: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg00859.html), we need to add a foreign library (Cilk Runtime Library) into the gcc repository. With this email, I am attaching the

[PING]RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-09-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello, Has anyone got a chance to look into this patch? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:51 AM To: r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); 'Jeff Law'; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com) Cc: 'gcc

RE: [PING]RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-09-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Err...I hit the send button too quickly, thus making a stupid grammatical error.. it should say Did anyone get a chance to look into this patch? Sorry about this. -Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:14 PM To: 'r...@redhat.com

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++)

2013-09-17 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 2:18 PM To: r...@redhat.com; Jason Merrill (ja...@redhat.com); Jeff Law; Aldy Hernandez (al...@redhat.com) Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C (and C++) Hello Everyone

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2013-08-21 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:31 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: r...@redhat.com; Jeff Law; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C Even more review stuff

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2013-08-20 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
can have some time (november to feb, during stage3) to do some more analysis and see if I can come up with a better solution. Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Aldy Hernandez [mailto:al...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:04 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: r

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 9:51 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Rainer Orth Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 On 08/18/2013 07:42 PM

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 10:20 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Rainer Orth Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 On 08/19/2013 10:06 AM

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 10:46 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Rainer Orth Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 On 08/19/2013 10:37 AM

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 2:23 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Rainer Orth Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 On 08/19/2013 12:40 PM

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-18 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2013 12:55 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Rainer Orth Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 On 08/16/2013 02:13 PM

[PING]RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-16 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Has anyone had a chance to look at this patch? Is it OK for trunk? Thanks, -Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 1:17 PM To: Rainer Orth Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: RE

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-16 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Jason Merrill [mailto:ja...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 2:08 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V; Rainer Orth Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 On 08/12/2013 01:16 PM

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-13 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 7:18 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 Hi Iyer, First off

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-13 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:38 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 Hi Iyer, thanks

RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C

2013-08-13 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
: Friday, August 09, 2013 12:52 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Aldy Hernandez; r...@redhat.com; Jeff Law; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Cilk Keywords (_Cilk_spawn and _Cilk_sync) for C On Thu, 8 Aug 2013, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: +enum add_variable_type { Two spaces before '{', should

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-12 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 7:54 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 Rainer Orth r

RE: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490

2013-08-09 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Rainer Orth [mailto:r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 7:54 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Marek Polacek (pola...@redhat.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for PR c/57490 Rainer Orth r

RE: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library

2013-07-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 5:08 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i

RE: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library

2013-07-23 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:04 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i

RE: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library

2013-07-22 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 6:56 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: Ian Lance Taylor; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i

Help with using multilib for Cilk Library

2013-07-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, I am trying to use Multilib on Cilk Library. I looked at this website (http://www.airs.com/ian/configure/configure_8.html) and used libsanitizer and libgo as samples to model after. It is currently failing with the following error message: libtool: link:

RE: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library

2013-07-19 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
-Original Message- From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com] Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 6:26 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Help with using multilib for Cilk Library On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Iyer, Balaji V balaji.v.i...@intel.com wrote

[PING][PING][PATCH] for for c/PR57541

2013-07-10 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Did anyone get a chance to look at this? If so, is this OK for trunk? It is a relatively minor change... Thanks, -Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Iyer, Balaji V Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 1:07 PM To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: r...@redhat.com Subject: FW: [PING

<    1   2   3   4   5   >