Re: question about treelang modification and debug

2006-04-13 Thread James A. Morrison
Eric Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seems the question has been solved, here is the changes of treelang/parse.y, just for fun :-) $ diff treelang/parse.y treelang/parse_new.y -u --- treelang/parse.y2004-01-08 15:50:46.0 +0800 +++ treelang/parse_new.y2006-04-13

Re: changing the SPARC default

2006-03-15 Thread James A. Morrison
Alexey Starovoytov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, The default architecture for GCC SPARC is V7. What do gcc sparc developers think about changing it to V8PLUS? Few things to consider: - v7 is legacy . used in old Sun's sun4c systems . 32-bit only . no integer mul/div insns

Re: S/390 Bootstrap failure due to fixup_eh_region_note

2005-09-06 Thread James A. Morrison
Andrew Pinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sep 5, 2005, at 6:39 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 02:27:54PM +0200, Andreas Krebbel wrote: (insn 31 29 49 5 (set (mem/s/j:SI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 47 [ env ]) (const_int 4 [0x4])) [0 variable.ex+0 S4 A32])

Re: Question on vrp_meet in tree-vrp.c

2005-09-05 Thread James A. Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes: [Sorry for the missing line in my last message.] I'm watching it deal with # small_1 = PHI 32(0), 1(1) vrp_meet is called with [32, 32] and [1,1]. It determines that the ranges don't intersect and then comes up with ~[0,0] since

Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types

2005-06-27 Thread James A. Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes: Sorry it took me so long to get to this. You're not showing where this comes from, so it's hard to say. However D.1480 is created by the gimplifier, not the Ada front end. There could easily be a typing problem in the tree there

Re: Fixing Bugs (Was: A Suggestion for Release Testing)

2005-06-15 Thread James A. Morrison
Robert Dewar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Yes, it's still the rule :-) and we have about 10,000 test directories now, many with a lot of code (it's many millions of lines in all, a good thing that machines are getting faster). In fact our test suite seems to take somewhat over an hour to

Re: a hello world frontend

2005-06-13 Thread James A. Morrison
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Em Sun 12 Jun 2005 23:58, James A. Morrison escreveu: Was there anything in particular that you found hard to understand in the treelang frontend. It is supposed to be the example/tutorial front-end. One thing is that the parser is very

Re: a hello world frontend

2005-06-12 Thread James A. Morrison
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Two colleagues (Rafael Dantas de Castro and Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri) and I decided to try to make a scheme frontend for gcc. Since the task is proving quite difficult we decided to write a very small frontend that could be used as a

Re: increase in code size with gcc3.2

2005-06-06 Thread James A. Morrison
Milind Katikar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, I was using gcc 2.9 (host - i386-pc-cygwin, target sparclet-aout). Recently I have started using gcc 3.2 (same host and target) primarily to ge the benefit of size reduction optimizations in gcc. However I observed increase in size for

Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze

2005-04-16 Thread James A. Morrison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) writes: Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I discovered

Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers

2005-04-16 Thread James A. Morrison
Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ian Lance Taylor ian@airs.com writes: Peter Barada [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've got a Using and Porting GNU CC manual for rev 2.95, and am looking around for a newer one and can't find it anywhere. Does anyone know if a newer printed manual is

Re: specification for gcc compilers on sparc and powerpc

2005-04-04 Thread James A. Morrison
Marek Krzyzowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello I appreciate your work and do not want to bother you, but I hope, that somebody will send me some helpful answer on my question. Is anyone can send me his 'specs' file (contains configuration for working compiler) ?? (this is standard

Re: gcc-4.0.0-prerelease: -O0 build time higher than -O1?

2005-03-23 Thread James A. Morrison
Rene Rebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi all, I'm just doing the first benchmarking with the 4.0.0 pre release (20050319) and just noticed that -O0 build time is not always the fastest. (In contrast to what the changes suggest: When compiling without optimizations (-O0), the C++ frontend is

Re: Pascal front-end integration

2005-03-01 Thread James A. Morrison
Steven Bosscher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mar 01, 2005 02:17 PM, James A. Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've decided I'm going to try to take the time and cleanup and update the Pascal frontend for gcc and try it get it integrated into the upstream source. Since

Re: Pascal front-end integration

2005-03-01 Thread James A. Morrison
Ed Smith-Rowland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 1 Mar 2005 at 8:17, James A. Morrison wrote: Hi, I've decided I'm going to try to take the time and cleanup and update the Pascal frontend for gcc and try it get it integrated into the upstream source. I'm doing this because I