On 08/08/2012 11:08 AM, William Swashbuckler wrote:
Hi,
I have recently read in several places that GCC now supports the
PowerPC VLE instruction set architecture as a target. However, I have
so far been unable to find any actual documentation on this? AFAICS
the online doc doesn't show any new t
I have booked a 2 bedroom suite at Les Suites for 10/24 - 28 (4 nights).
Anyone willing to share costs can take the other room.
Cheers, Jim.
If you're interested, please send me mail off list.
Jim.
--
James Lemke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 16:26 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jun 2, 2006, at 11:08 AM, James Lemke wrote:
> > I took a quick pass at implementing the comparisons in a more suitable
> > lanugage. Run time is now a few seconds on both platforms. About the
> > same as compare_test
I took a quick pass at implementing the comparisons in a more suitable
lanugage. Run time is now a few seconds on both platforms. About the
same as compare_tests on my old ibook/OSX and much faster on FC3.
Trials show the same results as before.
For anyone interested, the new version is attached
> > Both the results files I used contained the following ssequence of
> > results:
> > PASS: gcc.c-torture/compile/930210-1.c (test for excess errors)
> > PASS: gcc.c-torture/compile/930210-1.c (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/930210-1.c (test for excess errors)
> > FAIL: g
> Your approach is faster, esp. on Darwin / NetBSD.
> The only advantages I see to mine is handling variants (Richard's patch
> fixes that), verbosity control, and detail -- compare_tests only looks
> at X?(PASS|FAIL).
Hmm.. another small point, FWIW.
Both the results files I used contained the f
Whoops... I forgot to attach my fixes, for anyone that's interested.
--
Jim Lemke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Orillia, Ontario
--- dg-cmp-results.sh 2006/05/31 19:22:14 1.18
+++ dg-cmp-results.sh 2006/06/01 17:53:21
@@ -31,6 +31,16 @@ if test $# -ne 3 -o ! -f "$2" -o ! -f "$
exit 1
fi
+# Comman
> Please do. I'd welcome it (and scripts to generate html, to track
> known issues, to trim log files, to drive things and do on)... I
> think having a few different styles would be good, then people can
> try them all out and see which ones they like and why. Anyway, for
> me, it isn't
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 12:27 -0600, Jeffrey Law wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 11:25 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 02:13:44PM -0400, James Lemke wrote:
> > > I wanted some mechanical way to compare the output of dejagnu runs
> > > between releases, et
I wanted some mechanical way to compare the output of dejagnu runs
between releases, etc. I asked a few people at the GCC Summit last year
what they used or knew about. Not much came to light, so I ended up
writing something of my own.
It's a shell script I've been using on Linux with only trivi
> What do people who build in a combined tree do with intl? Do they use
> the GCC version or the src tree version? Is there any consensus about
> whether or not there should be a single version of intl, and if so,
> which one should be used?
FWIW, I have always given preference to the gcc versio
I suppose I should summarize what this problem was in case it's useful
to anyone else searching the archives.
A buggy cross-build process did not create libc.so.
The static linker didn't find libc.so so it silently used libc.a
instead.
Libc.a is not built with -fPIC so the load problem showed up.
I'm confused...
While working with tools for a PowerPC 8xx I've run into a problem
loading SO's:
/bin/hello.x: error while loading shared libraries:
/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: R_PPC_REL24 relocation at 0x0ff6c384 for symbol
`__pthread_mutex_lock' out of range
I'm using gcc-4.0.2+ (i686-pc-linux-gnu x pow
ll GCC it should forget everything
> it knows about alignment of whatever you know is not aligned.
> void *psrc = (void *) src;
> __asm ("" : "+r" (psrc));
> memcpy (dest, psrc, len);
--
James Lemke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Orillia, Ontario
1992 ST1100, STOC #3750; FW
I have a situation where a structure is not properly aligned and I want
to copy it to fix this.
I'm aware that -no-builtin-memcpy will suppress the expansion of
memcpy() (force library calls) for a whole module. Is it possible to
suppress the expansion for a single invocation?
--
James
of-Toronto area if anyone needs a lift.
Cheers,
Jim.
--
James Lemke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Orillia, Ontario
1992 ST1100, STOC #3750; FWD# M:245401 H:246889
Life is what happens while you're busy making other plans. --John Lennon
17 matches
Mail list logo
