Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction

2010-08-28 Thread Jeff Saremi
Starynkevitch bas...@starynkevitch.net Subject: Re: Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction To: Jeff Saremi jeffsar...@yahoo.com Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Received: Saturday, August 28, 2010, 1:05 PM On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:16 -0700, Jeff Saremi wrote: I'm hoping someone

Re: Beginner: Declarations do not show up when iterating through Gimple stmts

2010-08-26 Thread Jeff Saremi
well, that explains it nicely. thanks

Guidance needed: hi-level steps to track an object until its destruction

2010-08-26 Thread Jeff Saremi
I'm hoping someone here could take the time to outline what I need to do (i'm not looking for code but if you point me to some i'd appreciate it). I'd like to track an object from the it's created until it's destroyed (in C++). And then see if a certain method of it is called or not. To keep it

Beginner: Declarations do not show up when iterating through Gimple stmts

2010-08-25 Thread Jeff Saremi
I wanted to go through declarations in a function and print them out so as to get more familiar with them before being able to manipulate them. I wrote this function as a plugin; it successfully writes out all statements but mysteriouslty the declarations are missing. What am I missing? Is there

Fw: Debugging plugins with gdb

2010-08-11 Thread Jeff Saremi
Sending this to gcc since I got no help from sending it to gcc-help --- On Sun, 8/8/10, Jeff Saremi jeffsar...@yahoo.com wrote: From: Jeff Saremi jeffsar...@yahoo.com Subject: Debugging plugins with gdb To: gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org Date: Sunday, August 8, 2010, 9:52 AM I'd like to step into my

Re: Fw: Debugging plugins with gdb

2010-08-11 Thread Jeff Saremi
Daniel/Andrew thanks so much. I was using gdb version 7.1. So it understood deferred breakpoints but as long as I started gdb with something like ~/bin/gcc it never stopped in my function. As soon as I switched to running gdb on cc1, it worked! Now i can work on debugging the seg-fault i'm