Hi,
On 2019/11/25 5:55 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 5:29 PM Li Jia He wrote:
On 2019/11/24 2:26 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:19 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
On November 22, 2019 6:51:38 AM GMT+01:00, Li
On 2019/11/24 2:26 PM, Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM Bin.Cheng wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:19 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
On November 22, 2019 6:51:38 AM GMT+01:00, Li Jia He
wrote:
On 2019/11/21 8:10 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:22 AM
On 2019/11/21 8:10 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 10:22 AM Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
I found for the follow code:
#define N 256
int a[N][N][N], b[N][N][N];
int d[N][N], c[N][N];
void __attribute__((noinline))
double_reduc (int n)
{
for (int k = 0; k < n
Hi,
I found for the follow code:
#define N 256
int a[N][N][N], b[N][N][N];
int d[N][N], c[N][N];
void __attribute__((noinline))
double_reduc (int n)
{
for (int k = 0; k < n; k++)
{
for (int l = 0; l < n; l++)
{
c[k][l] = 0;
for (int m = 0; m < n; m++)
c[k][
On 2019/6/12 4:04 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 5:22 AM Li Jia He wrote:
Hi,
I recently did some analysis on the automatic vectorization of gcc, I
found that singed char can not be vectorized in the following code.
---
#define ITERATIONS 100
#if defined
Hi,
I recently did some analysis on the automatic vectorization of gcc, I
found that singed char can not be vectorized in the following code.
---
#define ITERATIONS 100
#if defined(do_reduce_signed_char)
#define TYPE signed char
#elif defined(do_reduce_unsigned_char)
#define TYPE unsigned
在 9/21/2017 5:25 PM, Jia He Wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I tried centos 7.4 gcc 4.8.5-16, which seems to announce to fix this
issue.
And I checked the source code, the patch had been included in.
My fault. All the gcc related rpms are needed to upgrade to
4.8.5-16(only upgrading
gcc*.rpm is not
Hi Wilcon
The 4.8.5 is default gcc version for centos 7.x
Ok, I will consider to upgrade the gcc version.
Thanks for your advice.
Cheers,
Justin
在 9/21/2017 8:56 PM, Wilco Dijkstra Wrote:
Hi Justin,
I tried centos 7.4 gcc 4.8.5-16, which seems to announce to fix this issue.
And I checke
procedure?
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Justin
On 9/21/2017 2:58 PM, Andrew Pinski Wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Jia He wrote:
转发的消息
主题: Possible gcc 4.8.5 bug about RELOC_HIDE marcro
日期: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:31:55 +0800
发件人:Jia He
收件人:linux-arm-ker
Thanks a lot, Andrew
Seems the centos 7.x still use gcc 4.8.5
Does gcc has any plan to push this fix to rhel?
It is really a big bug for arm64
Cheers,
Justin
在 2017/9/21 14:58, Andrew Pinski 写道:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Jia He wrote:
转发的消息
主题: Possible
转发的消息
主题: Possible gcc 4.8.5 bug about RELOC_HIDE marcro
日期: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:31:55 +0800
发件人:Jia He
收件人:linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
I tried to build kernel 4.14-rc1 on a arm64 server in distro centos 7.3.
The gcc
11 matches
Mail list logo
