Re: Clarification of cloned function names during profiling

2013-03-28 Thread Joe Seymour
On 03/28/13 15:28, Paulo Matos wrote: > On the other hand this seems to imply that nobody actually uses gprof > anymore... FWIW I fixed this for constprop because a customer reported it as an issue, so at least 1 person is still using it.

Re: Clarification of cloned function names during profiling

2013-03-28 Thread Joe Seymour
On 03/28/13 09:40, Paulo Matos wrote: > In certain situations, GCC will produce functions called foo.isra.0 or > foo.constprop.0. These function names are created by > clone_function_name where suffix is isra or constprop. > > On the other hand in gprof/corefile.c (function core_sym_class) of > b