Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/

2014-12-27 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com wrote: On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: Hi, https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/ (GCC 5 C++14 language feature-complete [2014-12-23]) which doesn't exist. It should probably

More links in release change list

2011-03-26 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
As I read through http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/changes.html, it seems to me that would be quite useful (and interesting) to be able to see more information for each of the changes. Links to relevant discussion, bugs, papers or patches/commits would make it far easier to understand the substance

Re: Massive performance regression from switching to gcc 4.5

2010-06-25 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
On 25/06/10 06:39, Richard Guenther wrote: There are btw. some bugs wrt accounting of functions called once being inlined in 4.5 which were fixed on trunk which allow extra inlining. Are these changes likely to make it onto the 4.5 branch and into (say) 4.5.1? j.

Re: Volunteer for a Beginner's Project: Header-Header Interdependencies

2008-02-10 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
NightStrike wrote: What is gcc's irc server? #gcc on irc.oftc.net

Re: __builtin_expect for indirect function calls

2007-12-17 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there any comments about the name, semantics, or usefulness of this extension? Sounds very useful for SPU code. I look forward to trying it out. Toying with the idea, the following seems like a potentially useful C++ form of the proposed extension : struct A

Re: Function specific optimizations call for discussion

2007-12-05 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Michael Meissner wrote: One of the things that I've been interested in is adding support to GCC to compile individual functions with specific target options. I first presented a draft at the Google mini-summit, and then another draft at the GCC developer summit last July. ... The proposal is

Re: Bug in gcc: assignment to non-lvalue

2007-09-23 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Jonathan Wakely wrote: I believe Andrew's right and the strcpy case is valid, but you do have a point. I think this should be rejected: struct A { int i; }; struct B { A get() { return A(); } }; int main () { B b; b.get().i = 0; // int error = b.get().i; } What about

Re: Linker problems: dependencies with .a file not resolved?

2007-02-28 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Christian Convey wrote: But the symbol really does appear to be in the archive: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ nm --demangle /home/cjc/csc583-svn/uriVisionLib/trunk/Development/Source/C++/liburiVision.a | grep uriVideoSources::ImageReader_gen::getFrame U

Re: Why does linker fail to resolve dependencies within the same .a file?

2007-02-27 Thread Jonathan Adamczewski
Christian Convey wrote: In function `uriVideoSources::ImageReader::getFrame(bool, uriBase::RasterImage*)': ImageReader.cpp:(.text+0x90): undefined reference to If the missing reference is to `uriVideoSources::ImageReader_gen::getFrame_(bool, uriBase::RasterImage*)' Why do you grep for